Hi. And welcome. If you've got evidence that global warming is pseudoscience please put it on the talk page. You might want to have a look at the pseudoscience page before posting. Cheers. --Bobbing for apples 13:52, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
I note that you've put some more on GW Talk - I for one ain't going to bother reading it if you can't even be bothered to log in. SusanYou don't have to talk, but ... 15:34, 2 November 2007 (EDT)
You actually got a not-too-shabby discussion on global warming going there! And here I was afraid you might just be another troll, bluffing and huffing without any intention of rational discussion or substantiating their points. Your points could maybe use a little more backing/evidence, but still, I was pleasantly surprised!
(Although I might also suggest signing in if you're going to post some more - you don't really have to, but it makes it a bit easier/less awkward to communicate).
Uchiha 19:30, 2 November 2007 (EDT) see? sigs are cool, sort of
I'm sure that you have read the community standards but you should be aware that RationalWiki is not NPOV. We are skeptical point of view. See RationalWiki:Project Whitewash/What is a RationalWiki article.