User talk:Defiant Elements
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
		
	
Hi there  Mr/Ms. Elements, welcome to RationalWiki the compulsively dark poodle of teh internetz. - User  18:49, 23 January 2009 (EST)
 Mr/Ms. Elements, welcome to RationalWiki the compulsively dark poodle of teh internetz. - User  18:49, 23 January 2009 (EST)
- Why thank you my good sir/madam!  Defiant Elements 18:51, 23 January 2009 (EST)
- Extensive user page, +10 points; extreme familiarity with with wiki markup, +20; used wiki markup instead of div tags, +20; have not made n00bish edit to WIGOCP, +35 points; plus the 3 for your sig ... gives you 88 points which is a number in the Fibonacci sequence so a bonus 5 taking you to 93 point. An excellent start. - User 20:13, 23 January 2009 (EST)
 
Hi, Defiant Elements!  I really appreciate the effort you put into your userpage—it's nice to see a newcomer without a red link for a userpage.  : )   Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:05, 24 January 2009 (EST)
 Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:05, 24 January 2009 (EST)
- Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħuman 01:31, 24 January 2009 (EST) 01:31, 24 January 2009 (EST)
- It's always nice to know that someone appreciates my genius :).   Defiant Elements     talk    contribs   01:51, 24 January 2009 (EST) Defiant Elements     talk    contribs   01:51, 24 January 2009 (EST)- Er, sure. Mostly unreadable, as far as I could tell.  You're still very welcome, of course, but mostly all I saw was "wall of text" that didn't say much in places it didn't belong.  Feel free to go the talk:Conservapedian fallacy page (after I move it to the correct namespace and delete the redirect) and defend it... ħuman 02:10, 24 January 2009 (EST) 02:10, 24 January 2009 (EST)- (Oops, Pi already moved it to the CP namespace) PS, does your sig really have to use five lines of text?  ħuman 02:14, 24 January 2009 (EST) 02:14, 24 January 2009 (EST)
 
- (Oops, Pi already moved it to the CP namespace) PS, does your sig really have to use five lines of text?  ħuman
 
- Er, sure. Mostly unreadable, as far as I could tell.  You're still very welcome, of course, but mostly all I saw was "wall of text" that didn't say much in places it didn't belong.  Feel free to go the talk:Conservapedian fallacy page (after I move it to the correct namespace and delete the redirect) and defend it... ħuman
- I see (I think) that you fixed your sig - thanks! ħuman 17:50, 24 January 2009 (EST) 17:50, 24 January 2009 (EST)- No worries, I'd just forgotten to transclude it.   Defiant Elements     talk    contribs   22:51, 24 January 2009 (EST) Defiant Elements     talk    contribs   22:51, 24 January 2009 (EST)- Settling in to a new wiki takes some steps, I know.  Take care and best regards. ħuman 23:03, 24 January 2009 (EST) 23:03, 24 January 2009 (EST)
 
- Settling in to a new wiki takes some steps, I know.  Take care and best regards. ħuman
 
- No worries, I'd just forgotten to transclude it.  
 
- I see (I think) that you fixed your sig - thanks! ħuman
 
 
"King Me" image[edit]
The "King Me" image is already on the Wiki at Image:Kingme.png.  ListenerXTalkerX 00:06, 27 January 2009 (EST)
ListenerXTalkerX 00:06, 27 January 2009 (EST)
- Curses, I was unaware of that.  Sorry 'bout that.  I went ahead and added a del tag to the one I uploaded.   Defiant Elements     talk    contribs   00:11, 27 January 2009 (EST) Defiant Elements     talk    contribs   00:11, 27 January 2009 (EST)
