User talk:Klapaucius/Archive1

This is an archive page, last updated 2 February 2010. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:  , (new)(back)

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Klapaucius! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Welcome to the mob. Silver Sloth 07:06, 27 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks for the welcome! Who'd have thought there could be such a thing as a rational mob? Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 10:07, 27 January 2009 (EST)

You should stick around: we're pretty irrational about 60% of the time. Love² 10:11, 27 January 2009 (EST)

Sounds like I should fit in quite well, then. :) Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 10:29, 27 January 2009 (EST)

Oh yes, you will. Welcome. I greet you on behalf of all rusty-spotted cats. Rusty-spotted catspeed! --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is GilliamM (no, I'm not!)} 19:24, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Why thank you. Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 19:36, 28 January 2009 (EST)

GOAT! MOAR GOAT! EVEN MOAR GOAT! GOAT! EXTERMINGOAT! --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is GilliamM (no, I'm not!)} 19:40, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Exterminating goats? My dear fellow, that's bordering on the blasphemous! Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 19:42, 28 January 2009 (EST)

That's my imitation of a Dalek. As you can see, they believe that all goats must be exterminated! They are the enemies of RationalWiki! My comrades, I rally you to fight these evil invaders! FOR GOATS! FOR RATIONALITY! FOR SCIENCE! FOR HAVING A FOURTH REASON! --"ConservapediaSubwayResistor^{is GilliamM (no, I'm not!)} 19:52, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Bad News...

I've demoted you to sysop. I'm well and truly sorry for this. Get yourself a mop and bucket.TheoryOfPractice 11:40, 29 January 2009 (EST)

Wow, that was fast! Thanks for the tools; I shall get scrubbing. Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 12:33, 29 January 2009 (EST)

Comment

You know, you don't always have to type comment into the edit summary when making a comment. If it is on a talk page it is always a comment. --"CUR^talk 18:48, 8 February 2009 (EST)

It's the dutiful Wikipedian in me trying to achieve 100% edit summary usage. Sad, I know. Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 18:50, 8 February 2009 (EST)

Good work

I appreciate the work you did correcting the Conservapedia's claimed differences with Wikipedia cat. It's good to see other people actively work on categories. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 18:38, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Thank you! There's just something about (lack of) apostrophe abuse that makes me correct it on sight. ;) Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 18:41, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Speling and Gramar

You thank for fixing me speling and gramar. --"CUR^talk 18:25, 12 February 2009 (EST)

No prolbem. Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 13:58, 13 February 2009 (EST)

WGOIW

Sighs. YOu did good, alright. That story is sad, pathetic, and so like the bigots of "religion is bigger than a 9 year old's desire to, you know, be happy".--En attendant Godot_{"«Oh, my Lolita, I have only words to play with! V.Nabokov»} 14:06, 5 March 2009 (EST)

You beat me to it, Vladimir (or are you Estragon?). Yeah, Good WIGO Klapaucius. Typical church acting on doctrine rather than trying to help someone. Totnesmartin 14:09, 5 March 2009 (EST)

Thank you both. Just thought I'd check for my first WIGOIW entry. Klapaucius^{Esteemed Constructor} 14:12, 5 March 2009 (EST)

I've been double beaten to the punch, great find for the WigoW and a sad one at that... The church would rather have a 9 year old carry twins to term, nevermind the fact that it would probably lead to complications for the mother and serious issues for the children themselves. Religious opinion seems to be once they're born, it's god's issue now. SirChuckB^{Call the FBI} 14:16, 5 March 2009 (EST)

My god, the well read Totnesmartin knows both Vlad and the characters of Godot... anyhow... I don't know why the church doesn't just demand we all put down every bit of science and live like animals - save for things like slaughtering cows and tossing blood on the alter. After all, god didn't give us medicine, the tree of knowledge did. and that was a sin. therfore knowledge is a sin. therefore, "just die you freaks, and pay the church all your money in the mean while". (oh, was that harsh of me. gosh. )--En attendant Godot_{"«Oh, my Lolita, I have only words to play with! V.Nabokov»} 14:36, 5 March 2009 (EST)

Looks like I got here last... yes, good item to add. Coincidentally I am listening to Mike Malloy rant about that very case right now. ħuman 21:16, 5 March 2009 (EST)