There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Legomania105
Owlman (talk) (mail) 04:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC) 04:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Rawls[edit]
Applying his philosophy always seems to run into more headaches than solutions. How, for example, is one supposed to know under the veil of ignorance how given policies would affect real-life citizens, without assuming some (biasing!) truths about economics and society? Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 00:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)