User talk:Quantheory

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is automatically archived by Archivist


...Do you know anything about Cosmology, specifically Inflation Theory? AceX-102 00:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Anything, yes. A lot, no. I specialize in small things, and my cosmology is a bit vague. That said, if you have a particular question, I might be able to help you find an answer Quantheory (talk) 00:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Well Inflation Theory deals with quantum mechanics, to start it off. I don't have a question I am just engaged in an epic battle with Philip J. Rayment over the in's and out of Guths inflation theory. Wondered if you'd like to join in. AceX-102 00:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
While that's true, my understanding of GR is a bit vague. Even so, I would be absolutely astounded if Philip Rayment could raise an objection that I couldn't handle. Quantheory (talk) 00:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Its not relativity, its quantum mechanics at its heart. I have been having this debate with Philip for several months - take a gander... You'll be pulling your hair out within 2 minutes. AceX-102 00:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Start here actually AceX-102 00:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

A good read[edit]

Well elucidated, sir. AceX-102 14:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you kindly, sir. -- Quantheory (talk) 14:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
your prize, sir. AceX-102 14:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Oh dear, demoted already? I thought I'd last longer --Quantheory (talk) 15:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)


Sorry I missed your parody first time round. It just looked like a wall of text from a Christian manic and I failed to read it at the "death" required. Good stuff. .-) --BobSpring is sprung! 15:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

And Poe strikes again! --Quantheory (talk) 22:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Relativity, again[edit]

Hi :), don't know if u still remember me, we had a not very constructive debate over relativity

Anyway, I wish to restart this discussion, but this time not as a debate, I'll just assume that I'm wrong from the start, because I simply find it hard to believe that all these scientists and mathematicians are wrong, and I am right :)

So, what I want to do is to raise my objections again, one by one, and since ur profile says that u r a scientist, I'll ask u to try to explain to me where I went wrong.

It doesn't have to be a discussion on rationalwiki, u can carry on a discussion via email,so, please email me at, if u r interested.

If u r busy nowadays, or not at all interested, then it's OK, just leave me a message on my talk page to notify me of ur refusal.

Bye :) Ahmadgad (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)