User talk:Quantheory

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is automatically archived by Archiver

Cosmology...[edit]

...Do you know anything about Cosmology, specifically Inflation Theory? AceX-102 00:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Anything, yes. A lot, no. I specialize in small things, and my cosmology is a bit vague. That said, if you have a particular question, I might be able to help you find an answer Quantheory (talk) 00:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Well Inflation Theory deals with quantum mechanics, to start it off. I don't have a question I am just engaged in an epic battle with Philip J. Rayment over the in's and out of Guths inflation theory. Wondered if you'd like to join in. AceX-102 00:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
While that's true, my understanding of GR is a bit vague. Even so, I would be absolutely astounded if Philip Rayment could raise an objection that I couldn't handle. Quantheory (talk) 00:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Its not relativity, its quantum mechanics at its heart. I have been having this debate with Philip for several months - take a gander... You'll be pulling your hair out within 2 minutes. AceX-102 00:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Start here actually AceX-102 00:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

A good read[edit]

Well elucidated, sir. AceX-102 14:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you kindly, sir. -- Quantheory (talk) 14:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
your prize, sir. AceX-102 14:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Oh dear, demoted already? I thought I'd last longer --Quantheory (talk) 15:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Parody[edit]

Sorry I missed your parody first time round. It just looked like a wall of text from a Christian manic and I failed to read it at the "death" required. Good stuff. .-) --BobSpring is sprung! 15:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

And Poe strikes again! --Quantheory (talk) 22:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Relativity, again[edit]

Hi :), don't know if u still remember me, we had a not very constructive debate over relativity http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Debate:Relativity-blah-blah

Anyway, I wish to restart this discussion, but this time not as a debate, I'll just assume that I'm wrong from the start, because I simply find it hard to believe that all these scientists and mathematicians are wrong, and I am right :)

So, what I want to do is to raise my objections again, one by one, and since ur profile says that u r a scientist, I'll ask u to try to explain to me where I went wrong.

It doesn't have to be a discussion on rationalwiki, u can carry on a discussion via email,so, please email me at, if u r interested.

If u r busy nowadays, or not at all interested, then it's OK, just leave me a message on my talk page to notify me of ur refusal.

Bye :) Ahmadgad (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Sysop[edit]

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ — and these external tools:

  • Rbutr shows user-submitted rebuttals to your current webpage.
  • Google Scholar Button (Chrome, Firefox) searches your highlighted text in Google Scholar. Easily check academic citations!
  • web.archive.org and archive.is can save permanent copies of webpages. Never lose a crank website or racist Tweet ever again!

Looks like you should have been sysopped a long time ago. Bongolian (talk) 06:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)