User talk:Sofer

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Sofer!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Just a note[edit]

Hi! Thanks for your great contributions so far. I just wanted to give a heads-up — any page with a {{biblenav}} does NOT need a scripture nav alongside it. The bible nav is already a more specific scripture nav, so where it applies, we already know beforehand that the scripture nav is not needed. Thanks! All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Alright, i'll keep that in mind.--Sofer (talk) 21:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Rise, my evil minion[edit]

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, wizard Sysop has been added to your user rights. Feel free to let your newfound ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ course through your veins. Once the high wears off, see RationalWiki:Sysop guide for more information. If you have questions, bleat ask away. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

I don't what it is, but i can't wait to check it out! Thank you.--Sofer (talk) 21:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Start by reading this, and always make sure to ask if you have any thoughts or questions! Th hug.gif All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


do not place long discussions inside ref tags. Any such additions belong in the article proper (assuming they make the cut generally). All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Trust me[edit]

You're not alone in keeping an eye out. Stick around. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:44, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


...I read through all of this, like I promised (and within a week).

Basically, I think that your last section nails it — and I agree with you (though I don't subscribe to your impugning of BG's motives, nor to your declarations that "the discussion is over").

I also moved some BruceGrubbese to a section of the article where it actually belongs, instead of right in the summary, wierdly contesting the claim to monotheism.

I've also reached out to BG two times regarding his edit practices. You were also given free run of the henotheism article. Does this all amount to something other than a LANCB on your part? I sure hope so. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)