User talk:Human

From RationalWiki
Revision as of 10:40, 13 August 2010 by Pibot (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Human/Archive29.)

Jump to: navigation, search


  • The 2008 election night party is enshrined at this dump. Thank you all for popping in, it was a blast!
  • The May 20/21 2009 RationalWiki second birthday party is here. There may still be some stains on the carpet, so be careful.
  • Somewhere around here I usually express my preference for avoiding table-tennis conversations. If I muck up your talk page, I'll stalk you until you reply there. If you defame my lovely estate of ones and zeros here, I'll add some random non sequitur to it here. Cheers! ħumanUser talk:Human
  • Threads over seven days old are automatically archived by an irrational "bot"
  • Here is my special archive for sticky threads.
This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: Archive list
See the history of vandalism to this article

You have been smitten by a bunny in accordance with the community standards for... no real reason. Feel free to revert this odd edit.

TK Brilliangs onWP (sticky)

"Most Christians find it suffices that Jesus Christ is accepted as Lord and Savior. I do know most organizations and sites take me as an accepted interpreter of what policy and precepts are." [1] Ya think? ħumanUser talk:Human 06:57, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

{{fact}}, I dare you.  Lily Inspirate me. 09:14, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
heh? Does this mean you get a 'truth' now? --PsyGremlinKhuluma! 09:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Oh geez, I knew I could count on you guys to get me in trouble ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 17:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hey! What are internet terrorists buddies for? --PsyGremlinRunāt! 18:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

A hate poem (sticky)

It wasn't a right mood for a love poem, but you wanted some pottery, so...

In RW you are a user
in real life you are a loser

Subhuman, inhuman

You want to be in Gang of Four
Religious persons you abhor
You pretend that you don't
Some will believe and some won't

Sometimes you try to be nice
Well, take some advice:
I know that you're cold as ice
Although your motto is "caprice"
So don't pay this high price
what it takes to be nice
for such a loser with lice

Yes, I've seen you trough
You're such a snake, I always knew
Your rightful place is at zoo

I'll tell your fate:
it's full of hate
and zero mates
and zero dates
(you're not even straight)
Cos everyone you will berate

--Idiot number 58 (talk) 05:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Delightful! Thanks so much for the pottery! I like it so much Ima gonna make it sticky! Best thing I've read here in ages. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
I especially enjoyed the Foreigner reference! ħumanUser talk:Human 05:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm very grateful that you appreciate my humble attempts to write poems :). If you want more, just tell me. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 07:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
That was actually brilliant. I'm imagining it being sung by Jon King to an amelodic version of "I Found That Essence Rare" - David Gerard (talk) 08:15, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Complete ass

Don't be such a fucking wank. AceX-102 06:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

In which of many ways I could be such a wank? ħumanUser talk:Human 07:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Because you are a furious masturbator. AceX-102 08:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Stop feeding the troll

Every time you chastise someone for trying to stop the troll, the troll orgasms. Unless your anti-trolling tactic is to get the troll's keyboard too sticky to type with, stop supporting a troll over a good user. It's no wonder he keeps coming back. EddyP (talk) 12:20, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Seriously. I get the fear of banning people for no reason, but MC is obviously a worthless troll. I really do not understand... Quarushank - You can't explain that! 12:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Only reason I can think of is Human likes having the trolls around. It was pretty much the same with TK. Not exactly an encouraging thing for new users when they show up and RC and the Saloon Bar are full of troll shit with "Human Approved" stamped on it. --Kels (talk) 12:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Only being here for ~3 months, I can vouch for this. Quarushank - You can't explain that! 13:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
There are excellent and logical reasons why "blatant griefers welcomed and protected" follows logically from the wiki mission statement and indeed the prospective foundation objectives, and why both of those would collapse utterly without protecting griefers and penalising those they're griefing. I have no idea what on earth those reasons could be, but I am fully confident a detailed explanation for the less perceptive of us is forthcoming - David Gerard (talk) 16:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
It's probably not useful to throw around "OH MY GOD YOU'RE TK", it's the local value of Hitler - David Gerard (talk) 14:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Never said anyone was. But it was a similar situation with Certain People™ unblocking him, encouraging continued trolling, etc. --Kels (talk) 19:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
David, seriously, why don't you go back to wikipedia? You are not funny, you alienate people, and you refuse to embrace the traditions and rules of this site. I just don't get it. (talk) 17:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, exactly. You've only been here 3 months. And you still don't get this site. I suspect you never will. (talk) 13:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Yeah. You've been banned for 2 months. And still don't get it that you're a worthless piece of shit. I suspect you never will, cock breath.

Quarushank - You can't explain that! 13:09, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

What does this have to do with MC? Last I remember I was being critical of DG for blocking occasionaluse for getting into a "fuck off" war of words with Toast? And to the OP, weren't you the guy who wanted to install checkuser? Why don't we just defer all user management issues to the eminent DG, since he seems to know exactly who should be binned, blocked, and/or silenced? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
When did I want to install checkuser? EddyP (talk) 20:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Oh, sorry, it was rangeblocks you were asking for. ħumanUser talk:Human 21:46, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


I fx'd the typos.

Template:Mecsig 03:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

I can live with that, thanks. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:38, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Conspiracy theory talk page

Hi, you left something on the conspiracy theory talk page from about two years ago, so I assumed you weren't watching that page anymore; I decided to put my reply on here:

The paragraph in question is talking about how conspiracy theories explain away their lack of evidence with "a tidy explanation" (one that fits into their conspiracy). Like, "I can't prove I built an over-unity machine because the Government stole the evidence." I think it made sense, but it gave way too many examples to be coherent. Stilldeciding (talk) 18:58, 8 August 2010 (UTC)


Hopefully your getting my e-mails, but want to emphasize the importance of getting the transfer contract done before Tuesday. If you could please get back to me on whether the digital signatures work and feed back on the draft contract. tmtoulouse 19:10, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Now that this Wiki is officially yours....

I plan to break it over and over again by sending Trent numerous truckloads of hot pockets and other items for which he needs appliances, and there is nothing you can do to stop me. Mwahahahahaha!!!! Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 22:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh, snap! The 1800 watt solution! ħumanUser talk:Human 01:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit comment

Re this edit comment. I hesitate to suggest that gerard has done very little in the way of ruining this website - much worse has been done I think. Errant behaviour has been the way for some time and I think you yourself have been guilty of descions much similar in the past. You consideration on this matter are appreciated and you can meet me in Epping wearing the brown derby and white rose any time you wish... AceX-102 09:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

So when did you become a fan of Lumenos?

I'm still curious as to when you decided his words weren't a complete waste of space - to such an extent you acted on it previously ("Lumenous wasting everyone's time is here"). What changed your mind? - David Gerard (talk) 11:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Fuck off, troll. (talk) 11:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Agree with the BoN known as MC here. DG, I used to think you made good contributions and were a valuable member of this site. As of late, I'm disgusted by your casual usurping of the rules of this site in the name of "MC!!!!" Fuck, the only reason you aren't called out for being a prick is because you pull the MC card. Well, people here may tolerate that kind of bullshit, but I assure you that I am sick of you casually ignoring the users of this site and the rules of this site when they bring those concerns to your talkpage. I'm sick of the bullshit, and if the RW community wants to continue to ignore it, then fine. But, if that's the case, I don't want to be a part of the RW community anymore. In law, they have the Clean Hands Doctrine. On RW, we have the "they said MC, so we ignore their bullshit" doctrine. The Goonie 1 What's this button do? Uh oh.... 04:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)