Draft talk:John Gabriel
Yawn[edit]
"A man of modesty, Gabriel openly implores the public on his green ink website that he should be nominated for the Abel Prize in mathematics already."
So now the IR-rationalWiki Morons don't like any other colour besides Black. How British, how fucking boring. I suppose they'll take the gay flag as a symbol of a fruitcake too now? Tsk, tsk. Perhaps what the gay community should do now is establish a new flag with various shades of gray and black? What absolute IR-rationalWiki imbeciles are, stepping into it every time some muck squishes around between their ears. Sigh,...— Unsigned, by: Hot sauce / talk / contribs
- "But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink!-💎📀1️⃣ (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hot sauce - I have added the square brackets so your ignorance can be enlightened. (And 'O Tannenbaum' should be written in deepest red or scarlet according to taste). 82.44.143.26 (talk) 15:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- "But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink! Maybe we should rename ourselves Complex Wiki or Quaternion Wiki. He can't stand REALity.--86.141.180.13 (talk) 00:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Two songs using the same tune
- O Christmas Tree, O Christmas Tree,
- Your branches green delight us!
- Beneath its shade we'll live and die,
- Though cowards flinch and traitors sneer,
- We'll keep the red flag flying here. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 18:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Every one else can edit the Slur (Essay?) except Gabriel of course![edit]
The chimpanzees who control IR-RationalWiki don't want Gabriel editing his own essay. Nay, it must be the opinion and the feelings of fools and insignificant nobodies. Sad, very sad. Hot sauce (talk) 07:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please read our RationalWiki:Guide for individuals or companies we cover. Щєазєюіδ
Methinks it is a Weasel 07:49, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- By the way, you are free to write your own essay on RW. In any color you wish. If it is nominated for deletion, I will personally vote to keep it. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Bwaaa haaa haaaa. I would not want anything about me published on this dung heap. Seriously? Chuckle. The current essay is such a load of crap that no one will take anything you say seriously. Good. You have nothing worthwhile to say anyway. 108.66.5.27 (talk) 21:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Well, the offer stands. Take it or leave it. If you think you can get a more generous offer at other wikis, go right ahead. another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 22:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Just publish any of your wrong opinions and call them facts and you will soon find out what will happen. I piss and shit on the lot of your morons. Hot sauce (talk) 20:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Is that supposed to be a threat? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 20:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Just publish any of your wrong opinions and call them facts and you will soon find out what will happen. I piss and shit on the lot of your morons. Hot sauce (talk) 20:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Isn't he cute? another (((zionist))) conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 16:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
@Gabriel "But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink!-💎📀1️⃣ (talk) 00:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
More whining[edit]
[show]Extended content |
---|
ωεαşεζøίɗMethinks it is a Weasel 12:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- If only it was math, and not ********... Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- I chuckled. Also, why does John Gabriel think he needs to give us permission to write about "new calculus"? I am not the Ombud's man 19:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
How about having a side by side[edit]
To get this back on the math track (though reading through Hot Sauce's throngs of insults is genuinely funny), why don't we make a side by side of Gaby's claims and the real math? I am not the Ombud's man 19:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Now that would be very useful indeed. Even I would support that. Isn't that better than slandering and libeling my name? I'll cease legal action if you follow that route, but as of now, this "essay" is defamatory and has only one purpose: to bring disrepute to my name and work. My character, views and opinions have nothing to do with the facts of mathematics. Only one caveat: you will not be misquoting my math because that is just as bad. If I disagree with any of your "quotes", you will be forced to remove them. But I am not fooled to think you will make such an undertaking, simply because my math is real and your ideas are bogus. Chuckle. Hot sauce (talk) 16:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hey last messenger of Pythagoras (Pi shall not be upon you 'cause it's irrational), regardless of fictionality, did Hippasus deserve to be drowned for discovering the sodomic shaitan-influenced jahiliyya that are irrational numbers?--31.205.130.62 (talk) 07:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- This article doesn't do Rational Wiki's reputation any good. I think it should be deleted. It says a lot more about Gabriel's opponents than it says anything about Gabriel himself. What's the point of slurs and all these unflattering statements about Gabriel? 70.174.125.144 (talk) 20:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
More whining again[edit]
Since I last visited, more untruths have been posted. You WILL remove all the untruths. In particular, the New Calculus derivative has NOTHING in common with the secant method.
One never resorts to the use of limits in the New Calculus. There are no "infinite series" in the New Calculus, only a partial sum followed by an ellipsis and it does not have anything to do with "infinity" in the New Calculus.
It is false that Taylor series or the sine series requires any knowledge of calculus or limits because the sine series discovered by Newton involves no calculus whatsoever.
I know a bunch of cranks run this site, but you can be liable for misinformation! At least have the decency to quote my work correctly and not libel me as you do.
My free eBook is available at this link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CIul68phzuOe6JZwsCuBuXUR8X-AkgEO/view
66.171.37.94 (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- @66.171.37.94 Your demands have been duly processed and promptly ignored. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 15:48, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Who is in charge of this site? Can you provide an email address? I don't wish to deal with mental midgets such as GrammarCommie.
- Also it is clear that the cranks on this site don't know what is the "secant method" which has not been "around for centuries" (sic), never mind the fact that it has nothing to do with the New Calculus derivative.
- There is no contact phone number on this crank site, is there? I am not worried about intelligent people who instantly dismiss your rot, only about the stupid masses who will be discouraged from studying my work because of your untruths and libel. 66.171.37.94 (talk) 16:06, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sir, I'm going to have to ask you to calm down and read the disclaimer in this essay. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 16:10, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- I dunno. I think we should do what this guy says. Otherwise he might retaliate with math.
DuceMoosoliniYour friendly RW
dictatormoderator 16:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- I dunno. I think we should do what this guy says. Otherwise he might retaliate with math.
- Sir, I'm going to have to ask you to calm down and read the disclaimer in this essay. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 16:10, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- There is no contact phone number on this crank site, is there? I am not worried about intelligent people who instantly dismiss your rot, only about the stupid masses who will be discouraged from studying my work because of your untruths and libel. 66.171.37.94 (talk) 16:06, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Don't address me as "Sir", you reptile. It's an insult to me. I don't care about your "disclaimer". Through your lies, untruths and misrepresentations of my work, you continue to damage my reputation in the eyes of those who can't see through the same - and that's the majority who I am trying to enlighten. I am not a crank so why is there an entry about me on your trashy site? Remove this entire entry about me because it is not at all 'harmless' as you assert. It's not even funny in any way whatsoever.
- For the record: I have never dismissed mainstream calculus, only its formulation which has never been rigorous. Rejecting the mainstream view does not make me a 'crank'. I know the view well, only I am not convinced it is correct and that is why I formulated a New Calculus based only on sound mathematics. So there are many falsehoods in this entry. Either correct or remove the same or even better - delete this entry. I do not want ANY association with you. Hope I've made myself clear. 66.171.37.94 (talk) 16:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sir, I must again request that you calm down over what amounts to an opinion column. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 16:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- For the record: I have never dismissed mainstream calculus, only its formulation which has never been rigorous. Rejecting the mainstream view does not make me a 'crank'. I know the view well, only I am not convinced it is correct and that is why I formulated a New Calculus based only on sound mathematics. So there are many falsehoods in this entry. Either correct or remove the same or even better - delete this entry. I do not want ANY association with you. Hope I've made myself clear. 66.171.37.94 (talk) 16:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- It seems you don't understand the difference between the words "opinion" and "libel". Do you have a dictionary or would you like me to explain the meanings to you? Again, who is the person I can contact who has the authority to remove this libelous and false entry? Is that too hard for you to understand? 66.171.37.94 (talk) 11:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, given your previous comments on this talkpage, it seems you understand neither of these terms beyond the fact that one has negative connotations and you can therefore try to use it as a legal bludgeon to (try to) silence criticism of your bullshit. This is an actual defamatory tactic that is extremely unethical and potentially illegal. Especially given that this page is not mere opinion, as I have toned down to in my previous comments, but in fact an essay, a word you seem bizarrely ignorant of. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 12:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- So Johnny Boy, here's the thing. If you keep threatening me, I'll keep being an asshole to you (It's my standard social policy to return that which I am shown to the best of my ability.) You may think that laws are bludgeon with which to hurt others, but I don't think that way at all. So, Fuck you, you son of a whore. As I said before, your actions are unethical and potentially illegal, so... Yeah. Fuck off, you abusive twit. I might have helped you out had you not be an self entitled prick. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Damn, get his ass, GC.
DuceMoosoliniYour friendly RW
dictatormoderator 02:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)- A) First amendment right to free speech. B) You were going to sue us for daring to disagree with you either way, so why exactly would I do anything other than point out how shitty your plan is? C) Prove the cited comments aren't from you. D), And this is just because I'm petty, you really are quite thin skinned aren't you? Searching for any mention of yourself, threatening to sue anyone who doesn't either shut up or write a fluff piece... I mean, I'm a loser, but that takes the cake. What a truly pathetic existence you must lead... ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 00:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
--Cosmikdebris (talk) 02:32, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- A) First amendment right to free speech. B) You were going to sue us for daring to disagree with you either way, so why exactly would I do anything other than point out how shitty your plan is? C) Prove the cited comments aren't from you. D), And this is just because I'm petty, you really are quite thin skinned aren't you? Searching for any mention of yourself, threatening to sue anyone who doesn't either shut up or write a fluff piece... I mean, I'm a loser, but that takes the cake. What a truly pathetic existence you must lead... ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 00:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- Damn, get his ass, GC.
- So Johnny Boy, here's the thing. If you keep threatening me, I'll keep being an asshole to you (It's my standard social policy to return that which I am shown to the best of my ability.) You may think that laws are bludgeon with which to hurt others, but I don't think that way at all. So, Fuck you, you son of a whore. As I said before, your actions are unethical and potentially illegal, so... Yeah. Fuck off, you abusive twit. I might have helped you out had you not be an self entitled prick. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 01:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, given your previous comments on this talkpage, it seems you understand neither of these terms beyond the fact that one has negative connotations and you can therefore try to use it as a legal bludgeon to (try to) silence criticism of your bullshit. This is an actual defamatory tactic that is extremely unethical and potentially illegal. Especially given that this page is not mere opinion, as I have toned down to in my previous comments, but in fact an essay, a word you seem bizarrely ignorant of. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 12:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- It seems you don't understand the difference between the words "opinion" and "libel". Do you have a dictionary or would you like me to explain the meanings to you? Again, who is the person I can contact who has the authority to remove this libelous and false entry? Is that too hard for you to understand? 66.171.37.94 (talk) 11:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)