2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Fun talk:Cat

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives for this talk page: , (new)


Recent edits[edit]

Personal attack on whom? No one is identified. Furthermore the remark abou not recognizing humour is the height of irony. — Unsigned, by: 2600:1002:b11f:4a29:4c14:2a1a:71de:7b2b / talk / contribs

For fuck's sake, please, this is not difficult! Sign your posts with (~~~~) or (if that's too fucking hard) by clicking on the fucking sign BUTTON: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) This keeps the place tidy and stops you looking like a complete arsing tool so please, just fucking do it already.
You inserted some pretty problematic claims about cat-lovers and clearly didn't understand that "facts about cats you won't believe" was just a joke. And you edit-warred. And put some passive-aggressive concern trolling into your edit rationales, which doesn't much help my perception of you. And you clearly can't even be arsed to sign your posts. Need I go on? --Goatspeed. See what I'm up toCircularREmail2.gifasoningSteal my ideas 20:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

“pretty problematic claims”?[edit]


For God's Sake[edit]

It's funspace, why is everyone so ANGRY?IveBeenFrank (talk) 21:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC) Has

Oh. It's just some dipshit, drive-by, humorless BoN concern troll who tried to put spiteful attacks into this article, and then later tried to whitewash our anarchism article, indicating that we've got ourselves yet another drive-by young anarchist tankie with more passion than sense. And then threw around accusations of me being the troll, starting a huge, Drink!-able fight above. Oh joy. --Goatspeed. See what I'm up toCircularREmail2.gifasoningSteal my ideas 21:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
How on earth can someone even be an anarchist tankie? Someone's got their words mixed up here, lol --Zoe Kirk (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


Seriously, what's wrong with this page[edit]

It keeps getting vandalized and protected. Why? GeeJayK (talk) 15:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

We should have a more serious article on cats.[edit]

I believe that cats are an interresting subject for a serious article. There is many woo about cats, for exemple that they have 9 souls, and it would be interresting to debunk it. Yassine Mehdi (talk) 11:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Guys, I am serious. It's shameful we only have a fun page about cats. We need a serious mainspace article on that topic. Yassine Mehdi (talk) 18:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)