Fun talk:Ken Quote Generator

I must complain I don't see the word likely once. - User $\scriptstyle -i\ln(-1)$ 20:09, 3 March 2009 (EST)

Is there a feature to display a random video on Youtube? If so, maybe we should turn the entire thing into a link for said feature. The Emperor_{Kneel before Zod!} 20:20, 3 March 2009 (EST)

It now has 530 views and 30 page edits. Soon, Ken will be completely falsified!! The Emperor_{Kneel before Zod!} 21:06, 3 March 2009 (EST)

HAH! I was JUST gonna start making a Ken Generator! Way to steal my thunder, Gentleman Emperor! ;) --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 23:02, 3 March 2009 (EST) PS: Oh, it was Weaseloid. He beat me by significantly more time than first thought!

Is there any way to make it edit itself ten times each time it's loaded? ħuman 23:35, 3 March 2009 (EST)

Wow, I came here to suggest that we should add a random Youtube video with every quote, and I see I have been beaten to it. Touche. SirChuckB^{Leave Death Threats Here} 23:35, 3 March 2009 (EST)

I see how this works...

Gentlemen! I will confuddle your precious tube, enabling me to destroy evolutionism on the internet. You should all be crinkling over Operation racket, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

Gentleman So and So

I must say that I find your comments in regards to Richard Dawkins and peanut butter are slightly surprising. Regarding my obsession with all things homosexual and my being firmly in the closet, you ignore the likelihood that appeal to ridicule is a logic fallacy. In fact, by my birthday, it is likely the pearl-clutching pansies at RationalWiki will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Antelopes is gathering steam!!! I'm off to skewer the sacred cows of evolutionism. Sincerely,

Conservative

Awesome. But can we make it so all we have to do is type in something like {{Kenquote}} rather than the rather long name of this page? --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 00:28, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Some of the material

Does Ken ever use the word censor? I always thought that was Andy's hobby-horse I thought Ken was more under the delusion that everyone was reading his opinion and agreeing. - User $\scriptstyle -i\ln(-1)$ 00:29, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Also there is no mention of things soaring up the search engine starting with G. - User $\scriptstyle -i\ln(-1)$ 00:30, 4 March 2009 (EST)

To get a feel here is the current Gentlemen:

Gentlemen, I think some liberals are doing a poor analysis of Conservapedia. Please look at CP's 2 year track record as far as monthly visitors: http://www.quantcast.com/conservapedia.com#traffic Liberals have failed to kill CP and it is on a upswing in terms of monthly visitors according to: http://www.quantcast.com/conservapedia.com#traffic (see 2 year history) and http://siteanalytics.compete.com/conservapedia.com/?metric=uv According to this website http://www.exactfactor.com/ in the last 2 weeks or so CP has moved up one ranking for this Google search which is an issue near and dear to liberals. We are now generally ranked #11 or #12 for this search whereas about 2 weeks or so we ranked #12 or #13. It will be quite interesting to see what happens if Conservapedia obtains a top 10 ranking for the above search. :)

We need to get it closer to this. - User $\scriptstyle -i\ln(-1)$ 00:34, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Yet when you type in evolution into the search box, CP doesn't turn up at all. . . --^Input The Resistor^Output 19:09, 4 March 2009 (EST)

All he has done set it to the page it is on, usual the second page results 11-20. I still find it amusing that he say it is 11 or 12 and even clicking his link I see 16 or 17. - User $\scriptstyle -i\ln(-1)$ 19:55, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Couldn't help myself...

Template talk:Kenquote. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 01:01, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Very nice!-- Antifly ^{Now with 50% less retirement!} 19:00, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Do you think he was crying...

...as he typed this? - User $\scriptstyle -i\ln(-1)$ 01:15, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Good, but...

It needs pictures!-- Kriss Akabusi^{AAAWOOOGAAAR!!1} 04:27, 4 March 2009 (EST)

What's next?

Will we do another generator? If so, who for? Personally, I think Karajou. Theemperor

Just wanted to say...

...I didn't think it was possible to make a non-Andy Quote Generator but you guys impressed me again. Good job. NightFlare 17:05, 4 March 2009 (EST)

If you could figure out how to generate the quote so that the quote generator took twelve edits (as shown in recent changes) to show up...then you'd really have something! 19:16, 4 March 2009 (EST) CЯacke®

New Material

Hi Ken, in case you're wondering, I was the one who added all those wonderful new quotes of yours... I would also like to suggest that in regards to this quote generator, I think it's funnier if we troll through old forums and put in actual quotes (like we do with Andy) rather than making shit up ourselves... But that is just my opinion. SirChuckB^{Leave Death Threats Here} 21:35, 4 March 2009 (EST)

I keep thinking that when I see the "operations" - Ken is funny enough on his own, can't we just use the ones he is running? Also, this should be linked from the operations segment I think. ħuman 21:37, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Yes, sorry, I agree. I'm guilty of making up batshit insane operation titles in regards to the Gentleman's operations in regards to the Google rankings of his articles in the major search engines on the internet. DogP 22:26, 4 March 2009 (EST)

The operations are the only part I'm a little lenient on just because, assuming we don't go overboard, it can lead to some very funny combinations.... But the other stuff should be legit (or at least close enough to seem legit) SirChuckB^{Leave Death Threats Here} 22:30, 4 March 2009 (EST)

IMMA CHARGIN' MAH GENTELMEN

GENTELMEN!!!!:):):):),

As I have stated at Conservapedia, the new Ken quote Generator has over 850 pageviews. Concerning quote generators and Ken, you omit that we have had over 50 page edits. In fact, by the time you've finished reading this, it is likely my quote generator will have over 1000 views and edits. :) :) :)

Rest assured, soon my rather unseaworthy boat of creationism will be hit by the waves of {{kenquote}}!!!

Sincerely,

Newton

I <3 you. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 22:52, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Andy

What about an option for him to address his quote to 'Andy' instead of Gentlemen? I'm a big fan of his occasional postings to Andy's talk page, which are otherwise exactly the same as his other communications.-- Kriss Akabusi^{AAAWOOOGAAAR!!1} 05:16, 5 March 2009 (EST)

"KrissAkabusiAwoogar" (I notice how you hide behind an alias), sarcasm doesn't working well in encyclopedias. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and you deny that liberals get a thrill out of deceit for its own sake alone, so it's obvious to me you're being taken in by liberal lies. You also refuse to accept that action at a distance reduces Hollywood values. Liberals don't like it, but the defining view of an evolutionist is his disdain for the Bible, despite its indisputable role as the most influential book, both in history and today. I just went to Wikipedia and typed in the silliest term I could think of: "duh". And what do you know: Wikipedia has an equally silly entry for it! I'm going to enter that Wikipedia's insight into our Wikipedia entry now. --aschlafly 01:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Gentlemen! I will baste your precious eel, enabling me to destroy RW pansies on the internet. You should all be pulling over Operation guillotine, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

Gentleman Aschlafly,

An anti-evolutionists emailed me out of the blue and your criticisms are slightly churlish. Regarding ShockofGod and web traffic, you censor that the Conservapedia article on the theory of evolution is not a diatribe. In fact, by the end of the month, it is likely the pearl-clutching pansies at RationalWiki will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Antelopes is gathering steam!!! The time of stalking is over. Internet creationists are ready to pounce!!! Sincerely,

Conservative

Kenpics

How do I get to the {{Kenpics}} template? How do we edit the text? DogP 13:31, 5 March 2009 (EST)

heres a link I just used some random word generators for now. Feel free to make a few changes. SirChuckB^{Leave Death Threats Here} 13:34, 5 March 2009 (EST)

This is what I love about that Kenpics generator. I just got that caption "Gentlemen! I will assassinate your precious frying pan, enabling me to destroy Atheism on the internet. You should all be exercising over our new operation" Under a picture of Andy.... You can't beat that. SirChuckB^{Leave Death Threats Here} 23:23, 5 March 2009 (EST)

I just had a pic of Andy with a caption threatening to masturbate our precious Texas. I can't unsee that. --Kels 13:09, 15 March 2009 (EDT)

I got one showing a picture of a communist threatening to neuter our precious Andrew Schlafly, which is far more epic win than yours. The Emperor_{Kneel before Zod!} 13:20, 15 March 2009 (EDT)

typo plz to fix?

"internetIn fact," ħuman 03:46, 15 March 2009 (EDT)

Epic

I'd like to thank whatever genius made this. I just discovered it and it made me spit things through things.-Diadochus 00:18, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

thought

Is there a way we could make it so the title of the page randomly displays in the Kendoll style? Like, "Gentlemen-I-have-cauldron-to-ablate-about!!!", as he often titles his shout outs. Is that feasible and/or amusing enough to do? --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 21:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

It ought to be doable, I think that command can go anywhere on a page. It might be a bit weird though for people who aren't reading anywhere near the kenquoted section. As if our talk pages aren't weird already, of course. ħuman 21:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh, no I just mean on the main quote generator page. I think it'd be easy enough to <noinclude> whatever coding would go into it. (Not that that wouldn't add a whole other level to the discourse around here...)--Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 21:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Randomisation

It appears (on my PC at least) that the random choices are only working for the first instance of each one. I believe that this was caused by the MW upgrade. Can someone fix it please?  Lily ^{Inspirate me.} 06:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Try putting a "blank" parameter before the closing brackets, like {{Kenquote|}} to force re-parsing with each instance. ħuman 21:08, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry bout that

I tried to insert a funny phrase, but I accidentally fucked it up, so I reverted my own edits. Moderateman3345 (talk) 00:05, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Wait, what?

Feeling left out of the joke here. It seems amusing but who or what is this Ken? --Pex (talk) 20:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

You'll wish you hadn't asked. Abandon hope all ye who click here. Sophie^Wilder 21:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! You monster, Sophie! PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?. 22:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Now that I have glanced upon the void and felt it gazing back at me I find myself asking: what did I hope to learn, indeed, that I did not already know! --Pex (talk) 22:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Question

Does 'Ken' (Who - Clarke/Dodd/Livingstone/plastic etc) address only a 'particular gentleman', or should there be a wider range of addressees? Anna Livia (talk) 14:26, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Truly ahead of it's time

Gentlemen! I will steal your precious telephone, enabling me to destroy Richard Dawkins on the internet. You should all be sanctifying over Operation Playstation 2, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

People get up in arms about the potential destructiveness of Large Language Models and other AI nonsense. "Oh no, the AI are gonna take our jobs" etc...

And yet, right here, from the year 2009, is a word generator every bit as convincing as the real deal. For all intents and purposes there IS no difference between the real Ken DeMeyer and this silly quote generator. Perhaps the real Ken has died many years ago, and his account over at Conservapedia is run by AI.

Look into it. - Rairyu75 (Talk) 22:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)