RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Category:Snark
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Category:Snark | Result: Delete[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Obsolete as all of our articles meant to have snark. Christopher (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- ClickerClock (talk) 08:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Castaigne2 (talk) 21:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- As above. —Kazitor, pending 11:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- The very definition of 'superfluous'. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
Merge/redirect[edit]
Goat[edit]
Could this category be redefined instead? It seems like it lists articles that are mainly about snark, which includes articles on parodies or Funspace, which is all snark. --It's-a me, 
🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 03:16, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- That could work, I'd support that. Christopher (talk) 17:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'd support that too Vorarchivist (talk) 22:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Nope nope nope. That would imply that people would read about the category before slapping it on every page they see. Existence = misuse. 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 23:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry @FuzzyCatPotato but I support it.--Rimuru Tempest (talk) 23:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Fuzzy, I'd check through it regularly and clear out any articles not about snark, the problem is whether we have enough snark related articles to warrant a category. Christopher (talk) 14:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry @FuzzyCatPotato but I support it.--Rimuru Tempest (talk) 23:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Nope nope nope. That would imply that people would read about the category before slapping it on every page they see. Existence = misuse. 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 23:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'd support that too Vorarchivist (talk) 22:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)