2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $9223.37Goal: $10000

RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Fun:Guinness

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Fun:Guinness | Result: the wankers have been beaten off[edit]

Fun:Guinness (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. Merge at best. FuzzyCatPotato of the Dubious Anythings (talk/stalk) 18:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
  2. Why was this even made?--Owlman (talk) (mail) 22:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 22:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. Guinness is good for you! Flannan Isle (talk) 19:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
  2. No reason to delete - David Gerard (talk) 22:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
  3. FCP is a wanker Pippa (talk) 00:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  4. Its a fun article, we don't normally delete those Bubba41102The place where you can scream at me 01:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
    @Bubba: But... but... RationalWiki:Articles_for_deletion/Fun:Bizarro_Kansas αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 01:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
    That was an exception, you need to have a guiness. Bubba41102The place where you can scream at me 01:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  5. --Castaigne2 (talk) 05:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  6. --Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 07:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  7. Eh, why? And I don't even drink Guinness... ScepticWombat (talk) 11:43, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
  8. FCP and Owlman are party-poppers. Typhoon (talk) 18:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]

Bolton Wanderers!
  1. Well, the article is crap, but that's never stopped us before... Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)