RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Fun:That fine-ass Mary Magdalene

Fun:That fine-ass Mary Magdalene | Result: Seven votes for delete within 30 minutes. It's gone. It's great how we've grown up.

Fun:That fine-ass Mary Magdalene (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. It's not funny. It's just sexist. This wiki has grown up since this page was created. Saying, "Phwoar! Look at Jesus' girlfriend in the nude," is beneath us now. Spud (talk) 13:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
2. At this point, just being offensive and disrespectful without even being funny (which is something that I admit I'm guilty of) is not going to do any good to our cause. We don't have the right to ask conservatives to stop being bigots if we use this kind of childish, meaningless attack. I'd say we don't even need a AFD, we can delete it by Talk page as we did on Fun talk:Conservative hotties. GeeJayK (talk) 13:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
3. Theres no joke here, just "look at christians depicting boobs". We can do better and it makes us look like 3 year olds. Techpriest ^{(I am Alpharius! / / / )} 13:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
4. Discussing sexy Mary Magdalene in art is fine, highlighting the Church's hypocrisy, but this isn't a discussion. Nothing to stop some keen art historian putting something on the Mary Magdalene page (preferably slightly less sexist or slightly more snarky), but right now there's nothing to merge or keep. --Annanoon (talk) 13:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

   I added a slightly more serious discussion of Mary in art/culture to her article, including (in the interests of equality of the sexes) a picture of fully-clothed Mary pawing a near-naked Jesus. --Annanoon (talk) 14:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

5. Not funny. Christopher (talk) 14:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
6. What Spud said. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 14:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
7. 

--It's-a me,  LeftyGreenMario! 14:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)