RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Joy of Satan (español)

Joy of Satan (español) | Result: Deleted

Joy of Satan (español) (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. No references at all, contains some strong accusations about Nazism, and sort of doubles as a BLP. Difficult for me to judge if this is a "very obscure small cult" (which would be okay) or "not a cult at all and just some hit-piece" (NOT okay). Spud mentioned in the Saloon that "tried looking for reliable sources that backed up the claims made in the Spanish article. I couldn't find any. I could only find those claims repeated on a couple of websites that looked even shittier than the Joy of Satan one."... (translate) Carpetsmoker (talk) 13:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
2. Since I'm quoted above, I have to say "delete" too. Spud (talk) 13:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
3. Yee, outright hit piece with absolutely no references. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ ^{You know who else exercises leeks? MY MOM!} 13:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
4. Like they said ^^--TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 14:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
5. Delete delete delete, no references and if they can't be back ed up, why keep the article?--Pokefrazer (talk) 15:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
6. [joke about sacrificing this article to the dark god Satan] FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 15:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
7. Our dark lord deserves something better. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 17:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Goat

• I would hold off a little while for the author to respond - David Gerard (talk) 15:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

  Or anyone else, for that matter. IMHO pages with only referencing problems and such can sit in AfD for a few weeks in the hope that someone fixes up the article enough so that the AfD can go away. Carpetsmoker (talk) 15:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)