RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Muslamic ray guns
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Muslamic ray guns | Result: Merge[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Non-notable old meme, was somewhat funny in 2011 but don't see the point in keeping it. Count Bezukhov (talk) 11:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- We don't do notability at RW, we do missionality. Also, I still see this being used from time to time. 85.210.49.154 (talk) 12:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC) (Sophie)
- Per Sophie. Snarky mocking of right-wing groups is super on-mission and we don't delete other articles (e.g. Andy) just because they're old. Spriggina (thảo luận) (đóng góp) @ 19:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
- Not really worth its own article in my opinion. Thusly my vote is to merge it with the EDL article. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, merge with EDL. After all, just like @GrammarCommie, I don't think this is really worth IT IS own article. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 21:25, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Some common misspellings are pretty dumb, but "it's" works fine as a possessive formed the way almost every possessive in the English language is formed. And "it's" can already mean "it is" and "it has", so it's not like a little ambiguity is really a big deal in practice. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- So I suppose you would write "your's", "hi's", "her's", "our's" and "their's"? I certainly hope not. —Kazitor
01:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- So I suppose you would write "your's", "hi's", "her's", "our's" and "their's"? I certainly hope not. —Kazitor
- Some common misspellings are pretty dumb, but "it's" works fine as a possessive formed the way almost every possessive in the English language is formed. And "it's" can already mean "it is" and "it has", so it's not like a little ambiguity is really a big deal in practice. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah. I think people are more likely to read about this forgotten meme if it's a section on the English Defence League page rather than if it's a stand alone article. Spud (talk) 01:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- It grinds a silly joke into the ground, but it is mildly amusing and missional. It's just that it seems disproportionately detailed with all the quotes, and doesn't actually do a very good job of explaining itself. Merge and maybe edit a bit. (A relevant image macro would be worth a thousand words.) I might support keeping if the article was funnier and had some actual pictures of Muslims with sci-fi weaponry. --Gospatric (talk) 16:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- What Gospatric said. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 18:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)