There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Neil Cavuto
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Neil Cavuto | Result: Keep by a very narrow margin[edit]
- Neil Cavuto – (View log)
Delete[edit]
- What good does having this article have? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 23:59, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Poorly written and off mission. The "snark" is unfunny and doesn't communicate anything meaningful. Lazy hitpiece. Conscience (talk) 13:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- um ... that's not a convincing deletion reason - David Gerard (talk) 14:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Your keep reason isn't very convincing, either... another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 23:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep! PBFЯЗЭSPДCЗ (talk) 22:55, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- No reason to off it. Applesauce (talk) 03:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
- Maybe merge him and other marginal Fox personalities into a single article? Bloviators with a bigger profile like Bill O'Reilly can keep their own articles. --Ymir (talk) 22:23, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Cavuto is a fairly minor Fox pundit who never goes off the deep end but also is never the sane straight talker.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 23:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC) 23:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)