RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Steven Goldberg

Steven Goldberg | Result: Keep

Steven Goldberg (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. 100-word stub by long-gone user; hasn't been touched in a year. Merge the book titles to patriarchy. 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 21:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
2. —チーズバーガー • めん  (talk • stalk) 05:13, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
3. Nothing of any value. Christopher (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
4. -⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 06:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep

1. I don't see why deleting it is the best choice. There's Goldberg's official site, where he summarizes his theory. We can expand the page based on it. And I am not long gone. - Student (talk) 23:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

   If the page is deleted, don't worry, it can always be restored. But next time, there has to be more effort even for a stub. However, if there is an expansion before the consensus is reached, then we don't have to delete the page. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 01:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

   If we keep it, I can write an outline of his theories. It was my intention when I first created this page, but I didn't have much time and I ended up forgetting about that. - Student (talk) 05:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

   Ok. I have adjusted some issues in the article and added some more content to it. Does it still have to be deleted? - Student (talk) 06:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

   Better now! I think we can hold off deleting this. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 02:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

2. Page is better. Switching from delete to keep. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 02:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
3. -RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
4. Keep in present condition - David Gerard (talk) 20:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
5. Small but useful article.. Regards, Cosmikdebris (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)