2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $9223.37Goal: $10000

RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Steven Goldberg

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Steven Goldberg | Result: Keep[edit]

Steven Goldberg (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. 100-word stub by long-gone user; hasn't been touched in a year. Merge the book titles to patriarchy. Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 21:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
  2. チーズバーガー • めん Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 05:13, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
  3. Nothing of any value. Christopher (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
  4. -DiamondDisc1(talk) 06:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. I don't see why deleting it is the best choice. There's Goldberg's official site, where he summarizes his theory. We can expand the page based on it. And I am not long gone. - Student (talk) 23:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
    If the page is deleted, don't worry, it can always be restored. But next time, there has to be more effort even for a stub. However, if there is an expansion before the consensus is reached, then we don't have to delete the page. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 01:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
    If we keep it, I can write an outline of his theories. It was my intention when I first created this page, but I didn't have much time and I ended up forgetting about that. - Student (talk) 05:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
    Ok. I have adjusted some issues in the article and added some more content to it. Does it still have to be deleted? - Student (talk) 06:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
    Better now! I think we can hold off deleting this. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 02:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
  2. Page is better. Switching from delete to keep. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 02:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
  3. -RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
  4. Keep in present condition - David Gerard (talk) 20:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
  5. Small but useful article.. Regards, Cosmikdebris (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]