2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $1675.86Goal: $10000
Information icon.svg At the chicken coop, we are currently voting on a change to the blocking policy to clarify when offsite behavior such as harassment and brigading can get someone banned from RW. A reminder that you need at least 75 edits and to have had an account for at least 3 months to vote.

RationalWiki:Articles for demotion/Alt-right

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Alt-right | Result: No consensus[edit]

Alt-right (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Demote to bronze[edit]

  1. Thebestveed (talk) 16:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
    You don't need to propose an AfDEM to demote an article to bronze. Vee (talk) 16:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
  2. Good article The brick wall (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  3. Edward the eight (talk) 10:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  4. Aethieizt (talk) 10:26, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Status quo[edit]

  1. No. Too many reference and quotation issues. Some paragraphs are minimally cited. It's close, but the article needs cleanup before it can be considered for bronze. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 17:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
  2. Agree. Bongolian (talk) 23:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  3. Per cosmik. Would also note that this article is a bit overfocused on the early alt-right and makes no mention of their more recent activities. -- Techpriest (talk) 19:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  4. 4-3 isn't a solid majority, and because someone decided to close this afdem unilaterally I'm gonna throw my vote in. No mention of the many issues cited in the No section. Vee (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  5. The G (talk) 14:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Goat[edit]