RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2951Goal: $5000

Tachyon energy

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Gabriel Cousens (left) and friend in 2007
Against allopathy
Alternative medicine
Icon alt med alt.svg
Unproven articles

Tachyon energy is a pseudoscientific concept used by proponents of holistic medicine.

Definition[edit]

The idea of "Tachyon energy" was proposed in a pseudoscientific book titled Tachyon Energy: A New Paradigm in Holistic Healing (1999) written by Gabriel Cousens and David Wagner, two proponents of spiritual medicine who pretended that they were doing science. In the book they claimed that "tachyon energy" can explain everything from acupuncture, chi, homeopathy, reflexology, yoga to chakras.

Since the book was written many New Agers have embraced the concept claiming that it has bridged the gap between science and spirituality.[1] Some have even set up websites to feed off the gullible to sell their "Tachyon energy" products.[2][3]

There is no scientific evidence that "Tachyon energy" exists and the energy has never been tested in any experiment. It is just another name for the belief in vitalism. It is no different than any other supposed metaphysical force such as chi, prana or vril.

No relation to science[edit]

Tachyon Energy has no real relationship to the hypothetical particle called a "tachyon" put forward by the physicist Gerald Feinberg, and which most physicists think cannot exist. Yet New Agers in hope of sounding more "scientific" in some of their books claim that there is a relationship.[4]

References[edit]