Talk:Styxhexenhammer666

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Icon altright.svg

This altright related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png
Editorial notes
  • This article and its talk page has been subject to drive-by comments by a Styx fanboy that has been indef banned (check talk page archive). Please do not feed the troll and if you want to comment, please exhibit good faith.

Archives for this talk page: <1>, (new)

Styxfanboy sighs: Lmaoo oh yeah[edit]

The HD section is a mess...[edit]

... written by someone who is as informed about the Holocaust as Styx.

For example, the claim is made: "He insists that Zyklon B was a mostly harmless delousing agent, and Auschwitz was burning through so much of the stuff mostly trying to keep lice from spreading the typhus epidemic brought about by Allied firebombing.[20] This is false"

Actually most of Zyklon B was used for delousing purposes, and only a small amount was used to kill hundreds of thousands Jews because it doesn't take much to kill people.

Reference: https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/pressac/technique-and-operation/pressac0015.shtml

"By far the greater part (over 95 percent) was destined for delousing (effects and buildings) while only a very small part (less than 5 percent) had been used for homicidal gassings."

Another claim: "In the same vein, he supposes the "shower" of Auschwitz to have been an actual shower. The "showers" were, in fact, disguised gas chambers."

That's just meaningless gobbledygook though. Auschwitz had lots of real showers and lots of gas chambers disguised as showers, one doesn't exclude the other.

Fighting ignorance with more ignorance is not the way. 2001:16B8:24E4:F400:F912:C1D3:E2BF:81DB (talk) 13:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

If you wish to rewrite the section to be more accurate, it would be welcome. Thank you for providing reputable sources. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 13:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
i learned that narrative about zyklon B in school from reading some book by ellie wiessel. what do you mean its false? That's what zyklon b was invented for. lice. they used it on the prisoners when they ran out of food. why is this even an argument in this page? — Unsigned, by: 170.76.237.251 / talk
You must understand saying Zyclon B was invented for killing Lice is evil and anti-sematic no matter the context. Because after all there has never been an invention created for benign purposes and later repurposed for ill intent. That has obviously never happened. Alsoa reminder that the clip being used is over 9 years old and out of context.2600:1702:2A00:B3F0:D04D:7C50:7E33:C365 (talk) 17:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
How is the clip being "over 9 years old" relevant? He was a grown man at the time, and it isn't like denying the Holocaust is a normal part of growing up in America. Presumably that's why your lousy excuse is followed up by claiming it's "out of context." But how is it out of context? --Ismailov (talk) 12:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Styx fanboy declares: So admitting a historical event occur is a knee jerk reaction[edit]

Styx fanboy asks: Is it wrong to blame those at fault?[edit]

Styx fanboy wonders: Is Jared Holt and Right Wing Watch a truly reliable source?[edit]

The man has an outright disdain for independent content creators and has regularly ignored the many times Styx has addressed and refuted his arguments2600:1702:2A00:B3F0:E083:A5AD:B9CC:3C11 (talk) 12:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Moving to The Netherlands?[edit]

One of HannahReloaded's video's (shortly after the 2020 elections) mentions him living in The Netherlands (I think she said Amsterdam). Is this true? 2A02:1812:2C66:D000:1CDF:F27B:D0EA:7167 (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Judging from his Twitter account, looks like the case. They posted a "Garden update" on August 4th from the Netherlands as well. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 00:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
He has stated that he is only living there temporarily because his wife is there. Hannah from Bible reloaded is a biased source and should not be trusted.50.86.22.98 (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Lol, that's not how bias in media works. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)