User talk:TAOB

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Copying Twodots' userpage[edit]

What's up with that? Knight CommanderIn ServiceTo HerGoatness 11:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

It's not as if you even have a Hall of Glories (yet) either, so the welcome text is kinda misleading don't you think. Knight CommanderIn ServiceTo HerGoatness 11:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Wow, I have a fan! Twodots (talk) 16:26, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Whassup,shitbag?[edit]

Why'd ya copy my userpage? I mean, I don't really care that you have, but I wanna know why. Twodots (talk) 19:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

If that upsets you so much you could just blank my user page and be done then and there, but you decide to have a conniption fit over that. And yes, you do seem to care, otherwise you would not have said anything. TAOB (talk) 20:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm not upset. Just wondering as to why you chose to copy my userpage when you could've copied the userpage of any other user. I mean, it's really not that nice of a userpage. I'm asking out of curiosity; I don't care if you copy my userpage or not. I don't believe there's any sort of rule against it. Oh, and I should probably mention: I can't blank your userpage. I could delete it if you were a troll, which I personally believe you are, but you haven't actually done anything as yet, so I have no authority to do so. Yet. Apologies if you're a good-faith editor. Twodots (talk) 22:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Unwelcome[edit]

New logo large.png Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, TAOB.

This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble.

We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives.

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you.

If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

Bongolian (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Don Bosco

Bongolian (talk) 20:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Goat Sees[edit]

What’s it for? Are you planning on uploading the files it checks for? It doesn’t seem to do anything useful, and doesn’t currently do anything at all if you insert it into an article without parameters (as you did with reddit). Christopher (talk) 12:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

You wanna know what it does, to put that simply, it adds the article onto the "Needs Goat" category currently. I intended to upload a picture of a goat to accompany the template, but right now I'm testing whether it works as intended or if anything's missing. TAOB (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Adding an article to a category doesn’t need a template. I’m going to delete it, if you want to recreate it make it do something useful. Christopher (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
I checked it earlier today and it looked like a Trojan horse, those #ifexist parser functions were very suspicious. I am a template editor myself, so I know what makes sense in a template and what doesn't. You did a good thing deleting it, RW shouldn't let people like him edit the template namespace in the first place. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
You're wrong, period. 2A0B:F4C0:16C:1:0:0:0:1 (talk) 14:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Your only and last warning[edit]

Make that "Goat sees" template one more time anywhere on the wiki and I will make sure you are banned indefinitely. You are not fooling anyone and especially not me since I am very knowledgeable with templates, and let's be honest your template is nothing more than a bad prank that you tried to plaster on random articles for the sole purpose of using it as a backdoor for offensive imagery. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 10:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled[edit]

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ — and these external tools:

Are you an idiot?[edit]

"His tariff threats forced Mexico to crack down on illegal immigration. Mexico is for the first time in recent history enforcing its own immigration laws — sending thousands of National Guard forces to its southern border to stop caravans of Central American migrants. Plus, Congress is poised to approve the U.S.-Mexico-Canada free-trade agreement, which would not have been possible without the threat of tariffs." Literally every part of this is wrong. I know you people are fucking brainwashed morons who want nothing more than for some authoritarian dipshit to genocide your supposed enemies out of existence, but JESUS MOTHERFUCKING CHRIST!!!! FUCKING LEARN HOW THIS SHIT WORKS!!! ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

For trying to help.
2A0B:F4C0:16C:3:0:0:0:1 (talk) 19:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Bias[edit]

If your idea of "correcting bias" is to cherrypick employment data from 2019 before record breaking job losses in 2020, you need to work on a more critical examination of your idea of what bias is. Including positive things to "balance" negative things mindlessly is itself a very serious kind bias. A serious attempt at resolving bias should be focused on a cohesive understanding and remediating misunderstandings. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 18:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)