Talk:Volapük
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Missionality[edit]
New Age bearing, perhaps. Not sure about missionality. Blue (pester) 05:51, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Are we really going to turn "missionality" into a serious criterion? Shall we just delete the whole "Fun:" namespace now? --Eira OMTG! The Goat be Praised. 01:34, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Esperanto has had a page since Dec '07, and is basically the same principle. Aboriginal Noise Punkrock 02:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sed Esperanto estas multe bona, kaj la nova mundlingvo. Volapük estas sole la stupida ideo de stupida pastro. Tiel, esperanto estas OK para la wikio, kaj Volapük estas elen. --Eira OMTG! The Goat be Praised. 09:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Missionality is already a serious criterion (why would we have a mission template if it wasn't?), but only in a very general sense. This article needn't be mission-tagged, though. Rescinding now. Blue (is useful) 04:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sed Esperanto estas multe bona, kaj la nova mundlingvo. Volapük estas sole la stupida ideo de stupida pastro. Tiel, esperanto estas OK para la wikio, kaj Volapük estas elen. --Eira OMTG! The Goat be Praised. 09:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Esperanto has had a page since Dec '07, and is basically the same principle. Aboriginal Noise Punkrock 02:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
I don't really understand why this article was kept. Is there any point? Volapük may have been promoted as an international language ~100 years ago, but nowadays it seems people speak it just for fun.--Кřěĵ (ṫåɬк) 10:35, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Esperanto. Lojban. E-Prime. Volapük. Existing languages are probably on-mission. Languages created for a purpose are certainly on-mission. αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 15:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Which 'two English words' - and did anyone consider the reforms Double Dutch? Anna Livia (talk) 14:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)