Template talk:Assquote

Looks like someone set up what I was hoping for... thanks :) ħuman 01:19, 16 December 2008 (EST)

Something different

Changed the template a tad, all. Now instead of having the name of the user generated automatically, you now input it yourself, so that when you insert this on a talk page, you can actually direct the facsimile of that moron's invective at someone in particular. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 20:23, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Cool, but can you allow the option of the reader always having it be their name, too? Like, make that the default (if 1, use input, if not, use what it was before)? Because that was a cool feature you removed while adding another good one. ħuman 21:26, 19 December 2008 (EST)

By the way, in doing what you did, you will have made every previous use of it screw up and just say {{{1}}}. Keep backwards compatibility in mind when changing templates... ħuman 21:27, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Oops, I forgot that this had been used a couple of times already...hmm...for now I think I'll revert back to the old version, since it's slightly beyond my wiki skillz to make both possible...I will ponder this, however, as I think you're quite right, and both should be available. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 21:39, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Done and done. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 21:53, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Oh, thanks. Anyway, as far as the code you need. It looks like this sort of gibberish: {{{if {{{1}}}|{{{1}}} else {{{what we had before}}}}}} but that is completely wrong in places. I'm trying to remember a template that uses this so you can copy it. Oh, yeah template:welcome does. If you need a tighter guide let me know here and I'll dig it up somewhere for you. ħuman 22:03, 19 December 2008 (EST)

I seem to have got both working, but now the problem is when someone adds a : to indent a post, it creates a huge break between the name and the body of text. I tried simply adding the {{{1}}} template to the source, but it doesn't work for the manual name insertion that way. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 22:08, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Yeah, colons totally screw it up either way right now. I'll take a look at what you have in there. ħuman 22:13, 19 December 2008 (EST)

I think the span tags might not be helping. Can we put it back the way it was and test it in a sandbox til it works all ways? We could put the following below it and save/preview all we want:

{{assquote}} {{assquote|DopeSlipper}} :::{{assquote}} :::{{assquote|TripHammer}}

ħuman 22:17, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Sounds like a plan. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 22:21, 19 December 2008 (EST)

I guess we need to be careful not to EC each other to death on this - do you want to copy the "almost working" version to a subpage here (and link it so I can find it), so we can both edit and preview it to death until we figure it out? I'll await your link. ħuman 22:24, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Ah, yes yes, of course. Here's the raw data in sand box form: User:Yossarian/sandbox2, and here's the almost working sandbox template: User:Yossarian/sandbox. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 22:31, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Discovered something. If one just adds the {{{1}}} template to the raw data, then try to use that through the template, with the colons, it doesn't make an indent at all. Don't know if that helps any. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 23:23, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Thanks, I'll see you at the sandbox, if you aren't already done fixing it ;) ħuman 23:32, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Not even close, lol. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 23:36, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Got it working. - User $\scriptstyle (6\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }n^{-2})^{1/2}$ 00:51, 20 December 2008 (EST)

Are you sure? test pattern follows

"Anonymous User" (what an absurd user name that is), I skimmed through your recent edits and I did reflect on how your 'experts' perceive American conservatives, and I've concluded they are clueless, so it's painfully obvious that you're committed to censoring the Bible. I urge you, I beseech you, I beg you: accept that abstinence helps resist atheism. The answer to your silly question is this: we don't fall for the self-serving liberal claptrap here, whether it is considered "official" by the Associated Press or not. You have a free will to reject logic, but you're not persuading anyone who respects logic. We're going to block your account unless you can explain why you are not a parody.--Aschlafly 13:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

"dumbass user" (you can't even post in your own real name), I don't have time right now to read your lengthy posting. I skimmed through your recent edits and I did reflect on how your 'experts' perceive American conservatives, and I've concluded they are clueless, so my confidence is over three standard deviations away from the mean that you're an Obama supporter. Furthermore, you are in denial that cremating heretics reduces genocide. Got news for you: polls demonstrated that something like 30% of young evangelical Christians, and even higher percentages of other Christian denominations, voted for Obama. Many of them are YECs. So there is nothing startling or remarkable about the possibility that a YEC is liberal. We don't have overly broad policies of censorship here on Conservapedia. Our rules are specific and their application is clear and almost never disputable. We've had liberal editors and even Administrators since the beginning and I can't think of a single editor who was censored for his ideas, rather than violating specific and incontestable rules. Your fight is with logic here, not us.--aschlafly 13:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

"Anonymous User" (what an absurd user name that is), I skimmed through your recent edits and I did reflect on how your 'experts' perceive American conservatives, and I've concluded they are clueless, so it's painfully obvious that you're committed to censoring the Bible. I urge you, I beseech you, I beg you: accept that abstinence helps resist atheism. The answer to your silly question is this: we don't fall for the self-serving liberal claptrap here, whether it is considered "official" by the Associated Press or not. You have a free will to reject logic, but you're not persuading anyone who respects logic. We're going to block your account unless you can explain why you are not a parody.--Aschlafly 13:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

"liberal troll" (welcome and hello, but abide by our rules or else your account will be blocked), your rant above is silly. I looked at your contributions and found them to be barely related to the point at issue here, so clearly you're another liberal enemy of conservative principles. Furthermore, you deny that women knowing their place prevents drug abuse. Believe what you like, but opposition to the death penalty is a way to try to deny Hell. Study the Bible and follow its commandments.--aschlafly 13:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Let me preview...

Nope, not working with colons yet. ħuman 01:28, 20 December 2008 (EST)

Typo

""CE" denies historical basis, so it's obvious to me you'renot conservative enough for us" please to fix :) ħuman 00:56, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Putting in fixed quotes

Is there any way this could insert a quote that remains fixed, instead of coming up different every time the page is loaded? To me, that's now the only thing that stops it being perfect.-- Kriss Akabusi^{AAAWOOOGAAAR!!1} 12:02, 24 February 2009 (EST)

Hmm...I don't think there is. Or, at least I don't know of it (oh the volumes I could fill with what I don't know). Jeeves or Trent might be able to think up something. --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 19:07, 24 February 2009 (EST)

Do it manually? Put in the template, hit "preview", copy the result and paste it in? I guess you'd either have to pick a user to address or copy that username trick into your result, though. ħuman 19:34, 24 February 2009 (EST)

That sounds like a good lo-tech solution. I just think that if you're lucky enough to get one where he signs his name 'Teh Assfly', it should be recorded for posterity.-- Kriss Akabusi^{AAAWOOOGAAAR!!1} 05:30, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Hey wait - that option's been taken out anyway...-- Kriss Akabusi^{AAAWOOOGAAAR!!1} 05:32, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Isn't that what the SUBST keyword is for? Lets have a go...

(OK, that didn't work, it doesn't eval the template first then subst in the result, it just substs in all the options. I guess there's no way to get it to work other than simply pasting the result manually.) --JeevesMkII ^{The gentleman's gentleman at the other site} 06:37, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Sadly, of course, c/ping will lose any links in the assquote, although I suppose they could tediously be redone manually also. ħuman 19:53, 25 February 2009 (EST)

fixed time stamp test

"Yossarian", claptrap is so prevalent among atheists that only liberal deceivers deny the connection. I skimmed through your recent edits and all you do is whine, so I'm confident you're lacking a largely defensive weapon of gun. Open your mind and admit that creationism prevents skateboarding. Liberals don't like it, but liberals like to deny that deceit is a real problem that causes real harm, and it is correlated more with the liberal belief system than with conservative principles. By the way, if you're "a really happy guy," you're a lucky one, like the smoker who lives to his 80s. Many atheists (and smokers) are not so lucky. Go back to Wikipedia, where censors delete conservative information daily.--aschlafly 03:44, 1 March 2009 (EST)

"Anonymous User", we don't fall for the self-serving liberal claptrap here. I looked at many of your edits before reverting them and I doubt you've taken half the statistics courses that I have, so clearly you're a member of the far left. You also clearly deny that chivalry helps resist genocide. The answer to your silly question is this: the defining view of an evolutionist is his disdain for the Bible, despite its indisputable role as the most influential book, both in history and today. There's no need to publish anywhere other than here. This site has an audience that is larger than most journals. --Aschlafly 03:49, 1 March 2009 (EST)

Oh yay! You figured out how to do it. I was just gonna ask. :) --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 03:52, 1 March 2009 (EST)

Substing

See here and here. If you type {{subst:expand:User:Nx/sandbox3|Andy}} you get

"Andy", moral decay is so prevalent among feminists that no further talk-page debates about it are necessary or will be tolerated. I skimmed through your recent edits and I feel depression and animosity coming through in your comments, so let me guess: you're trying to spread socialist propaganda. Open your mind and admit that the Bush doctrine prevents against autism. Do yourself a favor and admit that if you received a good grade for the reciting liberal viewpoints, then it becomes even more difficult for you to reconsider. I just typed in "Saint Valentine's Day," and Wikipedia redirects me to the secular form, "Valentine's Day." Help yourself by opening your mind, before it's too late. --Andy Schlafly 17:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

-- Nx / talk 17:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

So if the template is directed to the "whoever is reading it" username, does it lock onto the first usage, does that stay variable? ħuman 21:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

It stays variable:

"Anonymous User" (specialty not in breast cancer), mental illness is so prevalent among agnostics that I hardly think a citation is needed to demonstrate it. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and I doubt you've taken half the statistics courses that I have., so admit it: you're easily taken in by Hollywood Values. Furthermore, you deny that capitalizing Hell helps resist Evolution Syndrome. Got news for you: Carl Sagan was the public spokesmen for liberal scientists in the 1970s and 1980s, and an informal adviser to Jimmy Carter and other Democratic leaders. Run along now, and see how many people you can fool outside of Conservapedia. --Andy Schlafly 21:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

(that was {{subst:expand:User:Nx/sandbox3}}) -- Nx / talk 21:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Ah, cool. Although, the randomness is part of the fun... I guess at least each individual usage will be relatively unique. ħuman 21:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Noone said you had to subst it. -- Nx / talk 21:14, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

This is amazing, this is. I've gone ahead and implemented it (hopefully not jumping the gun). --Yossie^{Spring in Fialta} 23:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)