Template talk:Assquote
Looks like someone set up what I was hoping for... thanks :) ħuman 01:19, 16 December 2008 (EST)
Something different[edit]
Changed the template a tad, all. Now instead of having the name of the user generated automatically, you now input it yourself, so that when you insert this on a talk page, you can actually direct the facsimile of that moron's invective at someone in particular. --YossieSpring in Fialta 20:23, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- Cool, but can you allow the option of the reader always having it be their name, too? Like, make that the default (if 1, use input, if not, use what it was before)? Because that was a cool feature you removed while adding another good one. ħuman
21:26, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- By the way, in doing what you did, you will have made every previous use of it screw up and just say {{{1}}}. Keep backwards compatibility in mind when changing templates... ħuman
21:27, 19 December 2008 (EST)
Oops, I forgot that this had been used a couple of times already...hmm...for now I think I'll revert back to the old version, since it's slightly beyond my wiki skillz to make both possible...I will ponder this, however, as I think you're quite right, and both should be available. --YossieSpring in Fialta 21:39, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- Done and done. --
YossieSpring in Fialta 21:53, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- Oh, thanks. Anyway, as far as the code you need. It looks like this sort of gibberish: {{{if {{{1}}}|{{{1}}} else {{{what we had before}}}}}} but that is completely wrong in places. I'm trying to remember a template that uses this so you can copy it. Oh, yeah template:welcome does. If you need a tighter guide let me know here and I'll dig it up somewhere for you. ħuman
22:03, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- I seem to have got both working, but now the problem is when someone adds a : to indent a post, it creates a huge break between the name and the body of text. I tried simply adding the {{{1}}} template to the source, but it doesn't work for the manual name insertion that way. --
YossieSpring in Fialta 22:08, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- I seem to have got both working, but now the problem is when someone adds a : to indent a post, it creates a huge break between the name and the body of text. I tried simply adding the {{{1}}} template to the source, but it doesn't work for the manual name insertion that way. --
- Oh, thanks. Anyway, as far as the code you need. It looks like this sort of gibberish: {{{if {{{1}}}|{{{1}}} else {{{what we had before}}}}}} but that is completely wrong in places. I'm trying to remember a template that uses this so you can copy it. Oh, yeah template:welcome does. If you need a tighter guide let me know here and I'll dig it up somewhere for you. ħuman
- Done and done. --
Yeah, colons totally screw it up either way right now. I'll take a look at what you have in there. ħuman 22:13, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- I think the span tags might not be helping. Can we put it back the way it was and test it in a sandbox til it works all ways? We could put the following below it and save/preview all we want:
{{assquote}} {{assquote|DopeSlipper}} :::{{assquote}} :::{{assquote|TripHammer}}
- ħuman
22:17, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- Sounds like a plan. --
YossieSpring in Fialta 22:21, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- I guess we need to be careful not to EC each other to death on this - do you want to copy the "almost working" version to a subpage here (and link it so I can find it), so we can both edit and preview it to death until we figure it out? I'll await your link. ħuman
22:24, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- Ah, yes yes, of course. Here's the raw data in sand box form: User:Yossarian/sandbox2, and here's the almost working sandbox template: User:Yossarian/sandbox. --
YossieSpring in Fialta 22:31, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- Discovered something. If one just adds the {{{1}}} template to the raw data, then try to use that through the template, with the colons, it doesn't make an indent at all. Don't know if that helps any. --
YossieSpring in Fialta 23:23, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- Discovered something. If one just adds the {{{1}}} template to the raw data, then try to use that through the template, with the colons, it doesn't make an indent at all. Don't know if that helps any. --
- Ah, yes yes, of course. Here's the raw data in sand box form: User:Yossarian/sandbox2, and here's the almost working sandbox template: User:Yossarian/sandbox. --
- I guess we need to be careful not to EC each other to death on this - do you want to copy the "almost working" version to a subpage here (and link it so I can find it), so we can both edit and preview it to death until we figure it out? I'll await your link. ħuman
- Sounds like a plan. --
Thanks, I'll see you at the sandbox, if you aren't already done fixing it ;) ħuman 23:32, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- Not even close, lol. --
YossieSpring in Fialta 23:36, 19 December 2008 (EST)
- Got it working. - User 00:51, 20 December 2008 (EST)
- Are you sure? test pattern follows
- Got it working. - User 00:51, 20 December 2008 (EST)
"Anonymous User" (obviously your parents were atheists to give you such a pagan name so you're probably obese), unfortunately I can only conclude that you don't have an open mind about this. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and you persist in repeating the liberal claim that Obama is not an affirmative action president, so let me guess: you're not here to substantially contribute to this project. Like all atheists, you deny that exhuming heretics and burning their bodies stops autism. It's simple logic: those who reject logical analysis are not likely to accept the results of an unbiased study. If your approach is to rely on authoritative, time-tested sources, Anonymous User, then why haven't you been quoting the Bible during your many edits to this site? In Christ.--Andy Schlafly 04:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
"dumbass user" (your chosen name is obviously unacceptable), peddle the liberal double standard somewhere else. I reread the beginning of your rant at the top of this section and you still don't seem to grasp how liberals try to claim exclusive control of knowledge and its recognition, and how you should be objecting to that, so admit it, you're insane from San Francisco values. Like all liberals, you deny that creationism deters drug abuse. Contrary to what many of you obese atheists like to claim, if you received a good grade for the reciting liberal viewpoints, then it becomes even more difficult for you to reconsider. I often see good minds spiral into decay once they fall for atheism. You're not going to censor anything here.--aschlafly 04:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- "Anonymous User" (obviously your parents were atheists to give you such a pagan name so you're probably obese), unfortunately I can only conclude that you don't have an open mind about this. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and you persist in repeating the liberal claim that Obama is not an affirmative action president, so let me guess: you're not here to substantially contribute to this project. Like all atheists, you deny that exhuming heretics and burning their bodies stops autism. It's simple logic: those who reject logical analysis are not likely to accept the results of an unbiased study. If your approach is to rely on authoritative, time-tested sources, Anonymous User, then why haven't you been quoting the Bible during your many edits to this site? In Christ.--Andy Schlafly 04:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- "liberal troll", support for gun control is so prevalent among Democrats that no further talk-page debates about it are necessary or will be tolerated. I reread the beginning of your rant at the top of this section and I haven't seen a single insight from you yet, so there's a 95% chance you're a second generation atheist. And you persist in denying the obvious truth that capital punishment prevents sexually transmitted diseases. Do yourself a favor and admit that liberals try to invade and transform churches, and the list of examples is too long to provide here. Tell me, did you work for the tobacco industry in denying that cigarettes cause cancer? --aschlafly 04:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Let me preview...
- Nope, not working with colons yet. ħuman
01:28, 20 December 2008 (EST)
- Nope, not working with colons yet. ħuman
Typo[edit]
""CE" denies historical basis, so it's obvious to me you'renot conservative enough for us" please to fix :) ħuman 00:56, 18 February 2009 (EST)
Putting in fixed quotes[edit]
Is there any way this could insert a quote that remains fixed, instead of coming up different every time the page is loaded? To me, that's now the only thing that stops it being perfect.-- Kriss AkabusiAAAWOOOGAAAR!!1 12:02, 24 February 2009 (EST)
- Hmm...I don't think there is. Or, at least I don't know of it (oh the volumes I could fill with what I don't know). Jeeves or Trent might be able to think up something. --
YossieSpring in Fialta 19:07, 24 February 2009 (EST)
- Do it manually? Put in the template, hit "preview", copy the result and paste it in? I guess you'd either have to pick a user to address or copy that username trick into your result, though. ħuman
19:34, 24 February 2009 (EST)
- That sounds like a good lo-tech solution. I just think that if you're lucky enough to get one where he signs his name 'Teh Assfly', it should be recorded for posterity.--
Kriss AkabusiAAAWOOOGAAAR!!1 05:30, 25 February 2009 (EST)
- Hey wait - that option's been taken out anyway...-- Kriss AkabusiAAAWOOOGAAAR!!1 05:32, 25 February 2009 (EST)
- That sounds like a good lo-tech solution. I just think that if you're lucky enough to get one where he signs his name 'Teh Assfly', it should be recorded for posterity.--
Kriss AkabusiAAAWOOOGAAAR!!1 05:30, 25 February 2009 (EST)
- Do it manually? Put in the template, hit "preview", copy the result and paste it in? I guess you'd either have to pick a user to address or copy that username trick into your result, though. ħuman
Isn't that what the SUBST keyword is for? Lets have a go...
(OK, that didn't work, it doesn't eval the template first then subst in the result, it just substs in all the options. I guess there's no way to get it to work other than simply pasting the result manually.) --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 06:37, 25 February 2009 (EST)
- Sadly, of course, c/ping will lose any links in the assquote, although I suppose they could tediously be redone manually also. ħuman
19:53, 25 February 2009 (EST)
fixed time stamp test[edit]
"Yossarian" (what an absurd user name that is), you have free will to deny logic. I skimmed through your recent edits and if you were a true agnostic you would have 50% Bible edits and 50% non-Bible edits, so my confidence is over three standard deviations away from the mean that you're a member of the far left. Like all atheists, you deny that prayer helps resist rape. Do yourself a favor and admit that Mozart, Haydn, and Schubert are not as great as the German composers. You have free will to reject whatever you want, but you're only hurting yourself by that approach. People who do open their minds are amazed by the insights and happiness it brings. Please, please abide by the rules or blocking will result.--Aschlafly 03:44, 1 March 2009 (EST)
- "Anonymous User" (sounds like another self-centered liberal, like Obama), you might as well deny that 2+2=4. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and you fail to mention that liberals censor classroom prayer, so it's painfully obvious that you're a homosexual. Your atheistic worldview has led you to deny that religion reduces talk pollution. Whatever the mainstream media might say, atheism is optimized for an audience having an IQ only slightly above average, perhaps 105. The Starlight problem is a puzzle for both atheistic and biblical views. Actually, it's a bigger problem for atheistic views, because those views cannot accommodate the explanation that some of the light in the sky is show for people on earth. --aschlafly 03:49, 1 March 2009 (EST)
- Oh yay! You figured out how to do it. I was just gonna ask. :) --
YossieSpring in Fialta 03:52, 1 March 2009 (EST)
- Oh yay! You figured out how to do it. I was just gonna ask. :) --
Substing[edit]
See here and here. If you type {{subst:expand:User:Nx/sandbox3|Andy}} you get
- "Andy", moral decay is so prevalent among feminists that no further talk-page debates about it are necessary or will be tolerated. I skimmed through your recent edits and I feel depression and animosity coming through in your comments, so let me guess: you're trying to spread socialist propaganda. Open your mind and admit that the Bush doctrine prevents against autism. Do yourself a favor and admit that if you received a good grade for the reciting liberal viewpoints, then it becomes even more difficult for you to reconsider. I just typed in "Saint Valentine's Day," and Wikipedia redirects me to the secular form, "Valentine's Day." Help yourself by opening your mind, before it's too late. --Andy Schlafly 17:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
-- Nx / talk 17:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- So if the template is directed to the "whoever is reading it" username, does it lock onto the first usage, does that stay variable? ħuman
21:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- It stays variable:
- So if the template is directed to the "whoever is reading it" username, does it lock onto the first usage, does that stay variable? ħuman
- "Anonymous User" (specialty not in breast cancer), mental illness is so prevalent among agnostics that I hardly think a citation is needed to demonstrate it. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and I doubt you've taken half the statistics courses that I have., so admit it: you're easily taken in by Hollywood Values. Furthermore, you deny that capitalizing Hell helps resist Evolution Syndrome. Got news for you: Carl Sagan was the public spokesmen for liberal scientists in the 1970s and 1980s, and an informal adviser to Jimmy Carter and other Democratic leaders. Run along now, and see how many people you can fool outside of Conservapedia. --Andy Schlafly 21:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- (that was {{subst:expand:User:Nx/sandbox3}}) -- Nx / talk 21:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, cool. Although, the randomness is part of the fun... I guess at least each individual usage will be relatively unique. ħuman
21:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Noone said you had to subst it. -- Nx / talk 21:14, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- This is amazing, this is. I've gone ahead and implemented it (hopefully not jumping the gun). --
YossieSpring in Fialta 23:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- This is amazing, this is. I've gone ahead and implemented it (hopefully not jumping the gun). --
- Noone said you had to subst it. -- Nx / talk 21:14, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, cool. Although, the randomness is part of the fun... I guess at least each individual usage will be relatively unique. ħuman
- (that was {{subst:expand:User:Nx/sandbox3}}) -- Nx / talk 21:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)