Humans are herbivores

Potentially edible! Food woo

Fabulous food!

Nitrites Subway diet Jeffrey Smith Food dye Food irradiation

Delectable diets!

Vitamin D Clean living movement Vitamin C Steve Jobs

Bodacious bods!

Ephedrine Fad diet Broscience v - t - e

"Humans are herbivores" is an idea that has cropped up in fringe sections of the vegan community. It is often used as an argument by vegans but can exist as an idea on its own.

Proponents

• PETA
• The makers of Forks Over Knives
• HuffPo columnist and self-taught self-proclaimed "wellness expert" Kathy Freston.
• Various vegan YouTubers, such as Vegan Gains
• Vegan Artbook

Arguments

Most of the arguments in support of this idea are based on comparative anatomy and physiology, as well as supposedly "common sense" speculations about human evolution. They include the following:

• The argument that our teeth are similar to animals such as cows. Aside from being inaccurate, this ignores that bonobos, despite having similar teeth, are omnivores.

A Bonobo taking pride in being different from humans

• Similarly, the argument that human beings couldn't possibly have torn apart and eaten prey due to their puny teeth, jaws, and nails. This ignores that hominins have had stone tools for at least 2.6 million years, and it would be difficult to find evidence today if they had other, less-durable tools (like sharpened sticks) even before then. Butchery marks made by sharp tools on bones from that time period indicate that these tools were used by hominins for stripping and breaking bones and extracting marrow. The evolution of many distinctively human features (such as our brains) happened since we began eating meat. Homo erectus and other primitive humans had larger teeth than present-day humans; it has been hypothesized that a reduction in tooth and jaw size occurred in our ancestors after they developed cooking, as cooking makes food much easier to break down.
• The argument that our colons are longer than those of other omnivorous mammals. This ignores that our colons are shorter than those of specialized herbivores, and that chimps have even longer colons, despite being omnivores — although their diet is overwhelmingly plant-based.
• The argument that there is no way early hominids could have hunted down animals ourselves. This is fractally wrong; ironically enough, vegans saying this are subscribing to the widespread view in "meat-eating" Western culture that "meat" equals large mammals. Humans eat many kinds of animals: small game, poultry, fish, insects, shellfish, and so on, to say nothing of eggs, honey, or carrion. Chimpanzees and some other primates eat many of these as well. Early humans may have also scavenged, and while predators such as lions would be unable to easily break open bones, early hominids could use rocks to smash open skulls and large bones to access the brain and bone marrow.

These also ignore that the only natural source of Vitamin B₁₂ is meat or other animal products, such as milk and eggs. B₁₂ deficiency causes pernicious anemia which, as the name suggests, will kill you if left untreated. Indeed, a few vegetarians and vegans every year either die or get seriously sick from improperly managing their diets. Groups such as the American Dietetic Association state that all vegetarians or vegans need to consume supplemental B₁₂ or foods fortified with it. Most primates are able to get B₁₂ from their gut bacteria and absorb it in their large intestine, but human beings have different intestines which can only absorb B₁₂ in the small intestine, even though bacteria still produce it in our large intestines, and we then poop it out unabsorbed. It's not certain exactly when this change in our ancestors' digestive systems occurred, but logically it must have happened when there was already a substantial external source of B₁₂ in our diets, i.e. after we started to eat meat.

Furthermore, it ignores that most larger herbivores aren't themselves strictly herbivores, gnawing on bones and even occasionally meat. Deer, for instance, will eat carrion (and even engage in cannibalism), and to acquire the nutrients needed to grow their antlers every breeding season, the males will search out bird nests and devour the eggs and chicks. If given the opportunity, a deer will eat your corpse. Sweet dreams!

Fact

The mainstream view of human evolution is that until around 4 million years ago, the ancestors of humans lived in the jungle eating fruits and other soft plants. Around 4 million years ago, Australopithecus moved into the savannah and began eating harder foods, including seeds, nuts, roots, arthropods, small mammals, and possibly carrion or food left by larger predators. Around 2.6 million years ago, australopithecines developed tools, and probably somewhere between 1.7m and 1m years ago, early humans began to control fire, both of which allowed them to consume a greater range of foods, including the meat of large animals. Through all this, humans continued to evolve and change in their ability to catch and consume different types of food, and anatomically modern humans did not appear until 200,000 years ago.

Overall, the argument that humans are naturally herbivores is a pseudoscientific appeal to nature that doesn't even correctly understand "nature". This takes away from the more legitimate arguments for veganism and vegetarianism, such as ethical and environmental reasons. In assuming the choice is between plants and large mammals (bovids, deer, ovids, etc.), it also shows an ignorance of the wide range of non-vegan foods eaten by humans today.

In Short

There is nothing wrong with criticizing corporate farming practices, which are cruel. There is also nothing wrong with pointing out that beef and pork use a massive amount of water (the 30 million cows in the United States, for example, use more water than the 330 million humans). This means beef and pork may very well be unsustainable once the water wars hit later this century.

Many of these films and documentaries that push the vegan line do a good job of exposing this cruelty. However, many cultists (religious, political, etc.) often use legitimate wedge issues as a foot-in-the-door for their own agenda.

And veganism isn't always sustainable either. Plenty of rainforest has been chopped down to plant soybeans, for example (especially in Indonesia). And where does the manure come from to fertilize the plants? From animals (they are not using human sewage in farmland and you wouldn't want them to anyway). Not to mention many food plants are pollinated with bees (and many vegans avoid honey to avoid animal products).

If you are really worried about sustainability and cruelty, having your own pet chicken might be an option. Eggs provide B12. They also provide iron (which many vegans are also deficient in), though eggs should not be your only source in the day. Chickens do not use anywhere near the same amount of land or water that pork and beef do, nor do chickens put out anywhere near the same amount of waste as the latter two. Chicken manure has some good uses too, such as putting nitrogen back into the soil for future crops (though it must be processed in a factory first).

People who only consume chicken for meat are known as pollotarians ('pollo' being the Spanish word for chicken, pronounced as POH-yoh). People who eat only eggs for meat (and don't like killing chickens) are known as ovo-vegetarians or eggetarians.

External links

• PETA's opinion
• A random YouTuber's argument
• The huffpo column in question