User:Sid
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Normal Everything's cool. |
Decreased Less time for Lulz. |
OH NOES Almost no time for Lulz. |
Fun Facts[edit]
Sid
|
- On CP, I'm one of the users with the most blocks. (Guess how many of those blocks were actually justified...)
- On RW, I usually hang out on WIGO.
- Now also on aSK - let's see how that works out.
- I love fiddling with templates, and DPL is cool in my book, too.
- Politics are not my thing, and I stay out of most policy issues.
- I have the odd tendency to compile ridiculously long tables, especially when it comes to analyzing CP statistics.
Recent Subpage Projects[edit]
The CP Commandments (Honest Version)[edit]
(This is a work in progress. I wanted to do this for a long time, but procrastination is a bitch.)
- Do not copy.
- Exceptions:
- Copying from public domain sources is cool, no matter how useless the result is.
- Copying from GFDL projects is cool as long as you claim you're the original author.
- Copying from copyrighted sources is cool as long as you claim you're the original author.
- Copying from copyrighted sources is cool, period. You can just claim Fair Use.
- Copying from copyrighted sources is cool if you're a sysop. If you're still called out, throw a dramatic fit.
- Exceptions:
- Everything you post must be true and verifiable.
- Exceptions:
- Wild accusations against liberals are okay. Even when there are sources who prove you wrong.
- Wrong or unverifiable claims that back the conservative view are okay.
- Exceptions:
- Always cite and give credit to your sources.
- Exceptions:
- If it bashes liberals, it doesn't need a source.
- If the one making a claim is a sysop, it doesn't need a source.
- Related: Never ask for a source. Instead, it is YOUR duty to find one that proves or disproves the claim.
- Also, never use the "fact" template. Its use shows that you're pushing an agenda.
- Exceptions:
- Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.
- Exception:
- The Main Page is above the rules.
- If somebody "seems to know what he's talking about", any questions about authority are nullified.
- Any blog or openly biased source is fine, as long as it supports the conservative view.
- Sources that support the liberal view are biased and not authoritative.
- If an authoritative and reliable source defends anything non-conservative, it's clearly biased and unreliable.
- Exception:
- Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry.
- Exceptions:
- Unless it bashes liberals or praises conservatives.
- Unless it's the opinion of a sysop.
- Exceptions:
- Unproductive activity may result in a block. This is usually called the 90/10 rule, which refers to the rule's guidelines of "90% talk, 10% quality edits".
- Translation of some terms:
- "Unproductive activity": "Any comment that annoys a sysop, but which doesn't violate any other rule"
- "may result in a block": "will result in a block as soon as the sysop runs out of arguments"
- "90%": "anything >0%"
- "10%": "anything <100%"
- Translation of some terms:
- Castle Rule: Your user page is your castle. You are free to voice your opinion there.
- "Paper Castle" note: You are not allowed to post anything remotely bad about CP or any of its supporting members.
- "Reagan was awesome, so STFU!" note: You are not allowed to post anything remotely bad about anything conservative.
- "Skeleton Key" note: Sysops are free to edit, lock or delete your castle at any time.
- Don't bully other editors, don't make personal remarks, don't attack other users.
- Unless the other user is a liberal. Then all bets are off. Maybe keep the insults thinly veiled, just so you still look like one of the Good Guys.
- You will be held accountable for your actions. After all, "denial of accountability" is Liberal Style (#12).
- Exceptions:
- Sysops will never be held accountable for any of their actions.
- Friends of sysops will never be held accountable, either.
- Exceptions:
- There is nothing to see here. Move along, citizen.
- You see a sysop bullying an innocent editor? You see a sysop openly breaking the official CP Commandments? LOOK AWAY.
- Do not comment on how another editor's block was unfair.
- Do not criticize articles that bash liberals.
- Do not point out that some claim is so far-out that it's impossible to prove.
- Seriously, if a sysop did something you disagree with... go make edits to the "cat" article or something.
- You see a sysop bullying an innocent editor? You see a sysop openly breaking the official CP Commandments? LOOK AWAY.