User:Sid/MainpageSandbox

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to RationalWiki!
Amounts of contained clue may vary.
(Теперь и на русском языке)

About RationalWiki [Edit]


Our purpose here at RationalWiki includes:

  1. Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience and the anti-science movement;
  2. Documenting the full range of crank ideas;
  3. Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism;
  4. Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media.

We welcome contributors, and encourage those who disagree with us to register and engage in constructive dialogue.

Random Featured Article [What is this?]

"I never would endure this gripe, hath I not mine shotgun pipe".

The Shakespeare authorship question, also known as "Anti-Stratfordianism," is a fringe theory asserting that William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon was not the author of the plays attributed to him. First developed as an idea in the mid-19th century, the theory gradually took wing in late Victorian times, establishing a prolific literary vogue for amateur historians and a whodunit-addicted readership, whose mostly unreadable products now tally up to several thousand books and articles.

While all but a few members of the academic community ignore or disparage anti-Stratfordianism, it has achieved a slight degree of acceptance as a legitimate research topic among a small number of tenured professors. In late 2007, Brunel University of London began offering a one-year MA program on the Shakespeare authorship question, and in 2010, Concordia University in Portland, Oregon, a provincial hotbed of anti-Stratfordianism, opened a multi-million dollar Shakespeare Authorship Research Centre, under the direction of Oxfordian Daniel Wright, a Shakespeare scholar and Concordia's professor of English.

By intimating and diffusing a sense that there has been a gross centuries-long cover-up by the cultural and critical establishment of a scandalously repressed "truth", they appear to be trying to mobilise public opinion to pressure academia itself to take them seriously. These are the same sort of crank tactics that have allowed Moon landing conspiracy theories — and more recently, climate change denialism — to take hold.

More Featured Content [See them all]

Rated articles

Conservapedia articles:

Creationism articles:

Culture articles:

Debates

Essays

Files and media

Logic articles:

New Age articles:

Pseudoscience articles:

RationalWiki Portal

Religion articles:

Science articles:

Ufology articles:

What is going on? ("WIGO")

Need to know What Is Going On? We present regularly updated selections of the finest lunacy the Internet has to offer. Participate in the dialogue on the good, the bad, and the ugly!

What is going on...
. . . in the "world"? (talk)

Actual news from the "real world."

. . . in the Blogosphere? (talk)

Quality articles by bloggers, submitted by the RW community.

. . . in the Clogosphere? (talk)

Crazy articles from the clogged-up fringes of the Internet.

. . . at RationalWiki? (hic)

Our own main back-page.

Participate in RationalWiki [Edit]

Twitter logo.png
Facebook logo.png
Discord logo.png

We welcome contributors, and encourage those who disagree with us to register and engage in constructive dialogue.

RationalWiki portal:
Share how you found RationalWiki!
For news that caught our interest, see What is going on in the world.
For general chatter, the Saloon Bar is the place to go.
Essay portal:
Essays written by individual users covering a wide range of subjects. Comment on the talk pages or write your own.
Debate portal:
Informal debates covering political and philosophical issues. Participate freely or start your own.
Writing articles
Read up on what a RationalWiki page is and our community standards. Take a look at the help pages if you're having trouble.
We also keep a list of useful links.
Our to do list is where we pile up ideas for articles. See if anything piques your interest!