RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $4200Goal: $6000

User talk:Analytikone

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Analytikone!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Glad you could join the fracas. Aboriginal Noise What the ... 01:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

I just glanced at the above comment and though it said "faeces", which is kinda funny (to me anyways) since thanks to this comment I can't see the name Analytikone without sniggering at the "anal" part. Even though Aboriginal Noise contains almost all the same letters it takes rather a leap of imagination to confuse that name with "anal" so maybe some of us could stand to learn a thing of two from A.N. when picking monikers?
Lest I become too distracted, let me reply to your comment concerning me.
You ask if there are administrators on this wiki, and indeed there are, as you have found out. You could, however, have found that out by investigation, rather than making incorrect assumptions. You say that I am not qualified to call anyone an idiot since I do not understand that my rudeness is completely out of place, but it seems that your comments were out of place as you obviously didn't appraise yourself of this sites qualities before making this judgement. In fact you have used RW to make several longwinded speeches that nobody has shown any interest in, and I doubt you have much understanding of the site beyond this. So when you say "should we assume", there is no we. Just you. Others may come to similar conclusions regarding my good self, but likely for very different reasons.
I'd encourage you to sit a spell, take your shoes off, take a look around and see what RW has to offer. You might not like it, but at least you wouldn't be talking out your ass while you are here. M.B.E (talk) 18:24, 21 August 2011 (UTC)