There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Buxton
— Cosmikdebris (talk) 21:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Oh BTW he'll probably flip out at this point creating a flurry of accounts attacking himself and other assorted insanity. 82.132.245.95 (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Reason[edit]
You made a huge change to an article. That necessitates a talk page discussion. Commie Lib (talk) 01:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't make the change but saw it was constructive. A discussion was already made but you never explained why this content was being reverted.Buxton (talk) 11:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- No there was no discussion it was me you and Nissan. I disagreed with the edits due to their scale. Plus Don Juan also disagreed which is why they too reverted the edits.Commie Lib (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
WOW[edit]
WOW, you vandal! You attacked my User Page. I gave you a perfectly workable reason as to why I undid your edits. You childish idiot, explain yourself. Commie Lib (talk) 01:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Your edits don't seem so bad[edit]
"Talk about it first" seems like a strange demand for adding relevant content. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 15:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Ikanreed that is standard form for editing. Commie Lib (talk) 00:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)