User talk:Graham McKnight

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Graham McKnight!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

tmtoulouse beset 16:05, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

Haha, a very thorough introduction :-). Welcome, judging by political beliefs you should like it here. I don't know if we have a good article on the Iraq War yet... halp?-αmεσ (!) 16:30, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

No, but we have a bad one. Welcome to the Dollhouse, Graham Crackers! humanbe in 19:25, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

I am 95% certain that you may be a conservative infiltrator by using a real name rather than engaging in liberal deceit and choosing an alias like most other editors here. Come on, own up you're a conservative aren't you? ;-) Genghis Khant 16:32, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

Sorry Graham, you must realise that not everything written here (especially on user pages) is serious. I was parodying the welcome you (as a "liberal" - Conservapedian usage) might expect on the "dark-side". Genghis Khant 18:19, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
So, does Graham McKnight always refer to himself in the third person?CЯacke® 17:02, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
This isn't a sock for Bob Dole is it?--Edgerunner76 08:00, 17 September 2007 (EDT)
That Bob Dole (1996 Republican U.S. Presidential candidate) thing is a joke. He often refered to himself in third-person.--Edgerunner76 10:14, 17 September 2007 (EDT)
Welcome to the Wiki Graham McKnight! Have a goat:
Goat.jpg
And again welcome! - Icewedge 18:23, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
P.S. don't be disturbed by our obsession with goats, we just think they cute!

CP[edit]

Do you post on CP as just Graham?--Edgerunner76 09:01, 24 September 2007 (EDT)

You have the right to remain silent. Genghis Khant 12:01, 24 September 2007 (EDT)
After checking the Banwatch page I think that I have my answer, so you can probably disregard my question.--Edgerunner76 12:08, 24 September 2007 (EDT)

No, I don't post on CP --Graham 10:30, 25 September 2007 (EDT)

Smart move! --ИїģḥŤ¤Ṭŗáìṇ ♦Τάļќ ǃ 14:08, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

Could you blame me for believing that RWs mission was to bring down CP? The celebrated Samwell incident? I am taking a different direction after a change of heart on this matter. Thanks for the clarification Human. I will continue to write articles here, but have also created an account at CP so I can better study their polemical arguments and perhaps offer a little constructive crit' in order to help end this feud.--Graham 08:14, 13 November 2007 (EST)

What "feud"? Susan... purrrrrr ... 08:35, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Feigning ignorance?--Graham 08:39, 13 November 2007 (EST)

If you can call totally despising everything they stand for "a feud" then good luck to you. Susan... purrrrrr ... 08:48, 13 November 2007 (EST)
I recognise that what we are engaged in here exemplifies perfectly the standard dictionary definition of feud: 'any dispute or rivalry, esp. when bitter or protracted.'--Graham 09:09, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Ah...like the Korean war was a "police action"! Ha! Susan... purrrrrr ... 09:33, 13 November 2007 (EST)

No, like two adversaries bearing incompatible methodologies. You are certainly quick to judge and lambast me, Susan.--Graham 12:22, 13 November 2007 (EST)

I had no intention of any personal imputation - just that dictionary definitions can be misleading. I don't think that anyone could bridge the yawning chasm betweenCP & RW. A feud, to me, is a minor, irrational difference of agreement quite other than that which exists here. Susan... purrrrrr ... 12:49, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Thank you for making clear your relative understanding of the word 'feud'. I am better able to understand the cause of your upset now.--Graham 13:34, 13 November 2007 (EST)