User talk:HotNogs

Hi everybody this is my talkpage! Be nice please! Make sure to use a heading when making a new thread! HotNogs (talk) 07:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

I saw your thread on RW:TS, and surprised no one welcomed you yet, so I decided to do the honors.

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, HotNogs! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

--Andrew5 (talk) 22:07, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

I'm personally not surprised. --It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 22:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, that was my fault. I didn't see their RW:SB thread. --Andrew5 (talk) 00:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Notice

You have been vandal binned because of your recent edits. This means that you can only make one edit per 30 minutes. If you continue to make unwanted edits, you may be blocked without further warning.--TranslationForAll (talk) 23:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

While I agree it is bit of an exaggeration, it is still misgendering the subject. TranslationForAll (talk) 23:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your edits

Without going into the content itself, your edits were decidedly needing some rewrite. First, the edit had poor formatting. There was a list of headlines I made to separate it from the content of the article, but your edit stuck one of them separate from the other while starting a new paragraph attempting to summarize the events after this article. I figured this was better left as a separate level 2 header dealing with the events revolving with this one article. Your edits also failed to italicize Babylon Bee and also didn't capitalize "Mediate". Finally, your prose: "Many people has criticised" is a phrase that is weasel wording akin to "some people say", "studies show", "some" especially if it isn't supported by both named figures and references to other figures. I removed that aspect completely for its wishy-washiness, instead focusing on what Twitter has done. Your version had all these formatting errors and prose issues, and, with vetting, it would not stay that way, even on pages concerning other subjects. --It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 00:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)