There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Jonasbrothershater666
Welcome, er, to MetalPedia, JBH DCLXVI! ħuman 18:15, 23 December 2008 (EST)
- Some of us (me) have never heard of the "Jonas Brothers" & couldn't care less about them. Toast 22:27, 23 December 2008 (EST)
- And some of us think that ABBA is the best metal evah! Oh well... ħuman
22:33, 23 December 2008 (EST)
- And some of us think that ABBA is the best metal evah! Oh well... ħuman
PFoster[edit]
Not cool. If you want to keep contributing here harassing an established user is not the way to go about it. I agree 3 years was excessive, but you can get blocks amended. So chcck out RW:ABOUT, RW:NEW and RW:CD and I hope you contribute more in the future. - User 23:43, 23 December 2008 (EST)
- Wow, when did we get those wikipediaesque shortcuts? ħuman
23:50, 23 December 2008 (EST)
- I made them because I was bored. - User 23:57, 23 December 2008 (EST)
- I grouped them together here! :P --MAstEr oF pUPetStalk! 00:00, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- Okay but I have an idea: RW:SHORT
- (EC * 2)Arg, I hate those blasted things. I can never remember what the acronyms stand for, so I'm forced to follow the page to see what the hell it is, then come back to where I came from in order to do anything. It's friggin' annoying. --Kels 00:02, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- Does your browser support tabs? (or bats?) "Right click and deal with it later", I say. ħuman
00:40, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- Of course, I also agree with you. The first few (WP:AGF?) you learn. After the fifth or twelfth, they are just wikilawyer gibberish used to win arguments. Can we at least make the "acronyms" or whatever they are memorable and easy? Like RW:MISSION, say? Or RW:GOAT, or RW:TINMP? ħuman
00:44, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- Does your browser support tabs? (or bats?) "Right click and deal with it later", I say. ħuman
- (EC * 2)Arg, I hate those blasted things. I can never remember what the acronyms stand for, so I'm forced to follow the page to see what the hell it is, then come back to where I came from in order to do anything. It's friggin' annoying. --Kels 00:02, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- Okay but I have an idea: RW:SHORT
- I grouped them together here! :P --MAstEr oF pUPetStalk! 00:00, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- Is that like RW:TMNT??--MAstEr oF pUPetStalk! 01:00, 24 December 2008 (EST)
- I made them because I was bored. - User 23:57, 23 December 2008 (EST)