|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User talk:Judge Dredd/Archive7
do not want
Discord time, Joseph, or do you want the Cabal's actions to be exposed to the universe at large? — Oxyaena Harass 04:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Don't mind me, I am busy experimenting with authoritarian ideologies. :) :) :) — Dysk (contribs) 12:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination
You've been nominated to the RationalMedia Foundation election. Please accept or decline here; if you accept, you may wish to campaign.
71.3.195.138 (talk) 22:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Shield & Friends (in dutch: Schild & Vrienden)
Remember that I mentioned that name on the Discord several months ago? Turns out that the people who made this documentary, have posted it on Youtube (603 Likes/1089 Dislikes) and added English subtitles. It's 42 min. long. Want the link? This former student group basically hits every single far-right statement that exists (Islamophobia, women belonging in the kitchen, transphobia, homophobia, Anti-semitism, doxxing, ect...).
Both this group and their leader (and there's some controversy that came afterwards) are definitely part of our mission.
And like I said before I can spot grammatical errors, add userboxes and stuff. But I don't have SPOV, and this would sound too serious or boring if I did this (I hate this son of a goat).
And in case you're wondering, yes I am from Belgium (East-Flanders to be more precise). Tinribmancer (talk) 15:53, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- I thought you were from [insert x here]. — Oxyaena Harass 17:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- And what would "x" be? Tinribmancer (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, insert x here. — Oxyaena Harass 18:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Never heard of such a country. Is it one of "those" islands that the sheeple aren't supposed to know about? Tinribmancer (talk) 18:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Don't the x-men live there? xD — Dysk (contribs) 18:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Never heard of such a country. Is it one of "those" islands that the sheeple aren't supposed to know about? Tinribmancer (talk) 18:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, insert x here. — Oxyaena Harass 18:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- And what would "x" be? Tinribmancer (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
@Tinribmancer Yes I am very interested, I have been meaning to do something on this group ever since Keidikke admitted he was a member. — Dysk (contribs) 18:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Subtitles are available and not automatically generated by Youtube.
- Also, who's "Keidikke"? Is he a member from that one discord channel you visit with those 2 dutch guys that kept bikkering with each other? Tinribmancer (talk) 19:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes he's the one that honestly "isn't a nazi" despite being a self-described far-right nationalist. — Dysk (contribs) 20:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Some additional info: Dries Van Langenhove has a Facebook fanpage with over 58k likes and even though Far-Right political party Flemish Interest said they wouldn't let him join their party, he eventually did and now they're seeing this as a direct attack against them because of the 2019 elections.
You could say that Belgium has his own Sargon of Akkad (lots of similarities, except that he never believed that 9/11 was an inside job) Tinribmancer (talk) 11:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Your user page
Why is it linking to a wikipedia page? Tinribmancer (talk) 19:47, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- I know it's great isn't it, a cross-wiki redirect is clearly possible. — Dysk (contribs) 08:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
do want
D I S C O R D N O W. — Oxyaena Harass 19:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- I haven't been very active on Discord recently. — Dysk (contribs) 08:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Counterfeit son of a bitch
Fuck you, you understand that? You're hard of hearing, are you dumb, or deaf, or what? Goddamn foolish bitch, you're the one who called. — Oxyaena Harass 17:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Emergency
I need to talk to you on Discord NOW. — Oxyaena Harass 12:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Can't right now. May later. — Dysk (contribs) 12:59, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia
I have reverted some of your edits to the Uncyclopedia section on the wiki page. You have removed all .co links and replaced them with .ca links in a blatant attempt to improve the SEO ranking of .ca and diminish the SEO rank of the .co site (which is the top search result for Uncyclopedia). I have left links to both .co and .ca in the section for impartiality's sake. Now please don't do that again. --EMC 19:45, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- I was under the impression they had merged or were merging or something, since there is or was a massive banner saying something like that. But no matter. As a solution, I have removed all the inline links (which we don't do anyway per normal style), and put both sites in each reference (because impartiality). Furthermore, assuming you consider yourself an Uncyclopedian, I should point out I am not best pleased with the ridiculous amount of racist and sexist humour on it. Not to mention the incessant dubious content created by the sites literal Nazi contributors who somehow managed to write pages glorifying the KKK, Hitler, and other things, while simultaneously inserting extreme slurs (n-word etc) into way too many articles (and hundreds of redirects), and somehow this was actually encouraged. At one point when considering what to do with offensive content they seem to have created a category called 'Intentionally Offensive' just to make it clear this is absolutely fine. And there is in existence of an entire page dedicated to how to score points while vandalizing RationalWiki, something which people do actually follow from time to time. Honestly our take on that site is very tame right now, it is absurd. Some months ago now I personally put some effort into getting something done, which admittedly did involve getting people from taowc to "lobby" the site, and it had absolutely no noticeable effect (But I got banned on one of the forks yay!). Now to be clear, I don't consider Uncyclopedia some kind of ally, and I can tell you with absolute sincerity, again assuming you consider yourself an Uncyclopedian, and you think this is all somehow okay, that you can fuck right off. However, if you are not one of the people who likes all this, then my apologies for the rant, I just find it extremely annoying. — Dysk (contribs) 09:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- This shit again? — Oxyaena Harass 10:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know how that could have been your impression, but I consider the original issue resolved. I have no idea what your experience is with the wiki, but my experience and expectation has been that racist and sexist jokes are not tolerated unless they're employed to satirize racist and sexist attitudes. We try to make this clear on a policy page which reads, "Uncyclopedia is not censored. Except for pornographic and shock images, hateful articles, and other material deemed inappropriate or stupid, we may contain content that some readers consider objectionable, offensive, or unfunny." The 'Intentionally Offensive' template and category, which includes many articles that have nothing to do with the content issues you're raising and serves as a content warning, was not created as a green light for people to write articles glorifying Hitler, dropping n-bombs, etc. I see how one could argue that it gives some people the impression that "racist jokes = offensive = funny", but that would mean ignoring our user guide, the aforementioned policy page, our deletion logs, and the expressed views of administrators in countless forums and talk pages, all which literally discourage users from creating content which is crass, tasteless, and hateful. I understand we get bigoted edits and articles, certainly not because the community tries to be a platform for that content, but because a lot of ignorant kids with keyboards find outright racism and sexism hilarious. Our policies are clear that this content should be deleted, and we have been deleting such content for thirteen years. Not always consistently, of course. Some of that material falls through the cracks, which is why I always appreciate being made aware of particular content that needs addressing (such as some of the articles in the 'Intentionally Offensive' category, which I will take a look into after the Klan meeting I apparently must attend). Thanks for the feedback, and I wish you luck in finding better allies than a shitty comedy wiki. --emc [TALK] 19:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, I figured out who you are now. You're the banned user Arthur on Uncyclopedia, who after getting banned, relentlessly spammed our wiki, harassed and sent dozens of unsolicited dick pictures to our Discord and wiki users (including myself), is also a banned Wikipedia sockpuppeter. --emc [TALK] 22:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ah yes I think the listing for that is still up on my server, I would take it down, but y'know invitations to raid are clearly satirical and it says in the discord policy not to, so obviously everyone will abide by that. /s . Being serious for a moment, I did make every effort to address the problematic content (this being prior Wikia termination), and was told in no uncertain terms by multiple people to fuck off, because everyone was *so interested*. My apologies if you were affected by the subsequent raiding party though :/ . No doubt you have been told I am an insane SJW so aren't interested in what I have to say, but maybe if you could look at what Wikia specifically listed as troublesome that would be a start don't'cha think. After your Klan meeting with HGA of course. — Dysk (contribs) 00:02, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, because an article on a comedy wiki encouraging readers to raid RW is absolutely the same as someone who is upset they got banned from a wiki for abusive behavior raiding it and encouraging others to raid it. Even if they were the same thing, the misbehavior of others is not a license for you to do the same, and you were/are clearly not raiding our site to get us to take down the article in question. You're doing it because it's a personal vendetta for you, plain and simple. I appreciate the apology for the harassment and sending pornography to me without my consent, even if it is conveniently after I called you out for it. I've also not heard you called an SJW or whatever, but I don't care anyway since I'm literally the CEO of Antifa and I'm thrilled RW has been taken over by the vanguard party. I'd greatly appreciate less toxic behavior, editing and arguing in bad faith (as you have done on multiple wikis), especially when it comes to the Uncyclopedia section of the Wiki article. Thanks. --emc [TALK] 00:43, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Alright, so as far as this wiki is concerned, your RationalTroll page, being written almost entirely by trolls banned from here, is totally something we should mention (I only recently noticed it existed FYI). Furthermore, Uncyc's issues with racism, actual confirmed neo-Nazi contributors, sexism, and so forth, would be missional here should somebody actually cared enough to write about it. Me personally though, I would love nothing more than for most if not all Uncyc to simply disappear and although you say the misbehavior of others is not a license for me to the same, I simply don't agree and do spend much of my time on the internet disrupting the activity of those I deem overly bigoted, both personally and with other like minded people. You say you are the CEO of Antifa, maybe you aren't that bad, but the CEO of Racism needs to be destroyed :) . — Dysk (contribs) 12:47, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- You really believe that such an article should be mentioned to try and connect Uncyclopedia to trolling and raiding (which is a stretch) when you yourself do that exact same behavior? Is this not more bad faith argumentation on your part, considering you have a personal vendetta against yet another wiki that has blocked you? I still suspect this is a paper thin, post-hoc justification for your own abusive behavior so you don't have to hold yourself responsible for your own nastiness. Now, if one wants to highlight the presence of racist and sexist content on our wiki, I'd absolutely insist they mention that it's in contravention of the site's own policies and include a link to our list of administrators to whom they are encouraged to report such content so that a false impression is not given that we are simply a platform for hate. That is, if you think the purpose of doing so is to help eliminate some of that content (which it likely would) and you aren't doing it because you have a personal vendetta for being banned (which you are). There's nothing wrong with pointing out that a site has content which violates its own rules. That criticism is welcome at Uncyc, because despite your limited experience on the site (in which I'm oh-so-sure you were acting in good faith), I and others take seriously identifying and VFDing this sort of content. You of course want the site to "simply disappear", as you say, but let's be clear that you've done more than just hope for it: you surreptitiously pushed one Uncyclopedia's host to shut it down and you've been tarring the site on other wikis in an unconstructive and disingenuous manner. Your anti-social behavior, interwiki shit-stirring, and moralistic posturing aren't the direct action you seem to think they are. A morally serious person who had to apologize for sexually harassing people would take a HUGE step back and do some hard self-crit (and failing that, as you seem to be, they'd be promptly kicked out of leftist spaces). You really need to let this Uncyclopedia thing go before I start thinking you're a deep cryptochud with no life pretending to be an unhinged and inconsistent leftist for troll points. --emc [TALK] 17:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Alright, so as far as this wiki is concerned, your RationalTroll page, being written almost entirely by trolls banned from here, is totally something we should mention (I only recently noticed it existed FYI). Furthermore, Uncyc's issues with racism, actual confirmed neo-Nazi contributors, sexism, and so forth, would be missional here should somebody actually cared enough to write about it. Me personally though, I would love nothing more than for most if not all Uncyc to simply disappear and although you say the misbehavior of others is not a license for me to the same, I simply don't agree and do spend much of my time on the internet disrupting the activity of those I deem overly bigoted, both personally and with other like minded people. You say you are the CEO of Antifa, maybe you aren't that bad, but the CEO of Racism needs to be destroyed :) . — Dysk (contribs) 12:47, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, because an article on a comedy wiki encouraging readers to raid RW is absolutely the same as someone who is upset they got banned from a wiki for abusive behavior raiding it and encouraging others to raid it. Even if they were the same thing, the misbehavior of others is not a license for you to do the same, and you were/are clearly not raiding our site to get us to take down the article in question. You're doing it because it's a personal vendetta for you, plain and simple. I appreciate the apology for the harassment and sending pornography to me without my consent, even if it is conveniently after I called you out for it. I've also not heard you called an SJW or whatever, but I don't care anyway since I'm literally the CEO of Antifa and I'm thrilled RW has been taken over by the vanguard party. I'd greatly appreciate less toxic behavior, editing and arguing in bad faith (as you have done on multiple wikis), especially when it comes to the Uncyclopedia section of the Wiki article. Thanks. --emc [TALK] 00:43, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ah yes I think the listing for that is still up on my server, I would take it down, but y'know invitations to raid are clearly satirical and it says in the discord policy not to, so obviously everyone will abide by that. /s . Being serious for a moment, I did make every effort to address the problematic content (this being prior Wikia termination), and was told in no uncertain terms by multiple people to fuck off, because everyone was *so interested*. My apologies if you were affected by the subsequent raiding party though :/ . No doubt you have been told I am an insane SJW so aren't interested in what I have to say, but maybe if you could look at what Wikia specifically listed as troublesome that would be a start don't'cha think. After your Klan meeting with HGA of course. — Dysk (contribs) 00:02, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- This shit again? — Oxyaena Harass 10:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Those rules clearly don't prohibit what I was complaining about, because stuff I complained about, reported to multiple admins, sent to VFD, and made a forum post about, remains intact some six months later. Anyway if I was really was so inclined to get things cleaned up now I would undoubtedly do it on one of the other Uncyclopedia projects, since yours was the one that decided to ban me. I'm not going to comment here on what I did with Wikia and I am sure you are perfectly aware of why they subsequently stopped hosting all their Uncyclopedia projects. Your site may not be as bad as say ED, but there is absolutely no reason not to point out it's flaws, especially if the administration is unwilling or incapable of addressing it. Now, obviously after my initial experiences I have obviously developed a strong dislike and combative attitude towards your website and that is personal. However that's probably just me, so you don't need to worry since you are sitting on your own hosting in France and it would take more than a few leftypol cryptochuds to do anything serious there. :D — Dysk (contribs) 20:27, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Agent Smith reporting
I don't think you're an ultra-leftist SJW, Arthur. You seem to hold no consistent position and claim to be a "radical" purely to be a contrarian and to try to make yourself feel different from the mainstream, kind of like an "edgy" teenager (although you're in your early 20s.) You've recently been criticising and attacking antinatalism, but once you probably realise that is a "radical" position, you will do a 180 on that... It's as if you google things "radical" to make yourself feel special and separate from the crowd. I noticed you're attracted to hardcore Antifa extremists for the shock-value, but to make yourself seem different and contrarian to Antifa who are anti-Israel, you claim to be a "radical Zionist". Laughable.Triale (talk) 15:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- The only reason people complain about me being Antifa is when I annoy them it's a great way to claim i'm an extremist. I am essentially not an "ultra-leftist SJW", whatever people might say to the contrary. I do consider myself a leftist though, not a liberal. — Dysk (contribs) 16:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nonsense. There's a load of your internet postings where you support Antifa and Marxism and even identified as an SJW; why are you denying your past?. Bizarre. A user who knows you from Discord who spoke to me on Kiwi Farms said you support(ed) the Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist–Leninist), but then I click around and see you change very quickly to others and a whole load of contradictions... As I said, you seem to hold no consistent position and change every 5 minutes. And I'm still not convinced Emblyn is a separate person since they show the exact same behaviour, e.g. self-describing as a "radical feminist Zionist" (when they're none of these things.) Tip: True feminists aren't pro-natalists (having children is pro-patriarchy, just look up feminist antinatalism). Wood (talk) 16:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Supporting Marxist ideas and Antifa does not make me a ultra-left SJW you ignoramus. Nor does it mean i'm CPGB-ML (which is auth-left anyway). And since when am I a radical feminist? I am an intersectional feminist at best ... Get your facts straight. — Dysk (contribs) 16:48, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Emblyn said they are a "radical feminist Zionist". This could be you; at least there's no evidence this person is a separate individual. But if it isn't that leaves a "radical feminist Zionist" sister and a "Zionist, I sympathise with Antifa terrorism, enby pansexual" brother. What on earth is going on here? Are you doing this to rebel against your parents? lol. Well do keep, googling things to try to appear different and wanting to feel special. I'm guessing you chose "pansexual" as a sexuality category because it's one of the rarest and unheard of. You remind me of someone I used to know at school 15 year back who, desperate for attention, walked into school wearing baby bibs.Ire (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- So to clarify you have gone asked a bunch of people about me and got differing opinions. You of all people should know how this works, given that you are one moment reported to be a SJW yourself, and the next someone is saying you're an ecofascist, neither of which seem to be actually accurate labels. Though you seem to be lacking in some social knowledge given how you are happy to say "enby" and "brother" in the same sentence, and think sexual orientation is a "choice". — Dysk (contribs) 17:40, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- The ridiculous SJW claims are because Lomax lists a bunch of RationalWiki accounts under my name on his blog I don't own (with of course no evidence); these include some with Antifa in title, Anti-fascist, Marxist and one troll named NickLowlesFan (the founder of the Marxist "anti-racist" group Hope not Hate.) None are obviously mine, a few are probably Mike's (who has a history of making them as a parody and was trolling the real Nick Lowles on Twitter before getting suspended); see User:AntifaScientist that is definitely Mike. I've told Lomax to remove this misinformation from his blog I own these accounts, but he doesn't ever remove or correct his lies. So thanks to him, various websites copy his BS I'm an SJW and created accounts here with Antifa etc in title.Dorm (talk) 20:15, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- So to clarify you have gone asked a bunch of people about me and got differing opinions. You of all people should know how this works, given that you are one moment reported to be a SJW yourself, and the next someone is saying you're an ecofascist, neither of which seem to be actually accurate labels. Though you seem to be lacking in some social knowledge given how you are happy to say "enby" and "brother" in the same sentence, and think sexual orientation is a "choice". — Dysk (contribs) 17:40, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Emblyn said they are a "radical feminist Zionist". This could be you; at least there's no evidence this person is a separate individual. But if it isn't that leaves a "radical feminist Zionist" sister and a "Zionist, I sympathise with Antifa terrorism, enby pansexual" brother. What on earth is going on here? Are you doing this to rebel against your parents? lol. Well do keep, googling things to try to appear different and wanting to feel special. I'm guessing you chose "pansexual" as a sexuality category because it's one of the rarest and unheard of. You remind me of someone I used to know at school 15 year back who, desperate for attention, walked into school wearing baby bibs.Ire (talk) 17:26, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Supporting Marxist ideas and Antifa does not make me a ultra-left SJW you ignoramus. Nor does it mean i'm CPGB-ML (which is auth-left anyway). And since when am I a radical feminist? I am an intersectional feminist at best ... Get your facts straight. — Dysk (contribs) 16:48, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Nonsense. There's a load of your internet postings where you support Antifa and Marxism and even identified as an SJW; why are you denying your past?. Bizarre. A user who knows you from Discord who spoke to me on Kiwi Farms said you support(ed) the Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist–Leninist), but then I click around and see you change very quickly to others and a whole load of contradictions... As I said, you seem to hold no consistent position and change every 5 minutes. And I'm still not convinced Emblyn is a separate person since they show the exact same behaviour, e.g. self-describing as a "radical feminist Zionist" (when they're none of these things.) Tip: True feminists aren't pro-natalists (having children is pro-patriarchy, just look up feminist antinatalism). Wood (talk) 16:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Yeah there is quite a lot of history between you, Abd. and Mike. I recently had the opportunity to talk to Mike on Discord (I checked on Stormfront it was really him) and his attitudes were interesting to say the least. He didn't seem to be much of a fascist and the far-right there made fun him for being fake, but he has really nailed the irrational hatred of Jews, truly nobody could be more offensive. Sadly he had to be banned for repeatedly making death threats. However, I sometimes question who if anyone is technically correct in all this. — Dysk (contribs) 20:39, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Yack
Now I want an apology for the libeleous bullshit you and User:Oxyaena have been posting about me. Acknowledge the fact that you do this shit to get back at people who ban you, and stop fucking yacking about me on here and accusing all of the trolls of being me. It's pathetic. You live in England, yes? You know your country is famous for the courts being harsh towards people who commit defamation, yes (I learned about that in a college business law course, btw). 2607:FB90:929B:B691:0:C:22F:6501 (talk) 01:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hmm, I might have agreed a few weeks ago, except for the fact people on the aforementioned Discord provided a detailed profile, news articles and reports, and emails in which you actually confirm main details, so no, none of the limited amount I have said about you is factually wrong or libelous. I don't know who you thought I was, but essentially I have no issue with taking direct action against anyone I don't like if I think it is deserved. And yes this is more personal than to do with vandalism you are responsible for on this wiki. Oh and it's obvious when you troll here, your style is distinct and you have a habit of later admitting to it by implication. I know you said in an email to someone that you have good-hand accounts with sysop, but that's just to be expected here. — Dysk (contribs) 12:47, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Wrong person, Arthur. That is someone else you've harassed. And no surprise (reading above) you got banned from another wiki.Triale (talk) 15:49, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- I doubt it given the comments made here and revdelled directly before. But if it is someone else they are at liberty to say who so I can give a proper response. — Dysk (contribs) 16:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Wrong person, Arthur. That is someone else you've harassed. And no surprise (reading above) you got banned from another wiki.Triale (talk) 15:49, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
What in the world just happened
I just read the revision before the archive. I just have few things to say. Don't raid wikis, don't call for raids, even for satire. Never send porn to anyone, ever. So, Uncyclopedia has articles on disrupting RationalWiki. Okay, who cares, let them play their little game. You need to find something else to do, and because of all these petty actions, this clogs the recent changes, you get red link trolls reregd or whatever constantly posting in your page, and I have to investigate what is going on and even get alarmed by users accusing you of posting porn with no prior context. You wasted my time, you may have wasted others who also don't have any clue what is going on without going into the lengthy archives. This drama is not behavior I condone from a fellow wiki editor and you need to swallow your pride, resolve, and clean up whatever mess is going on. --It's-a me, 
LeftyGreenMario! 06:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Are you going to fix your userpage?
? Commie Lib (talk) 04:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Fix how? It's supposed to be like that. — Dysk (contribs) 17:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- He got me... I wrote a whole elaborate response to what I thought was Dysklyver's talk page, but it turned out to be an article totally unrelated to him! By the time I had realized this, I was so proud of my little elaborate response, that I posted it anyways on that random artlicle's talk page!!
- Scottperry (talk) 23:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
election date
So you wanna announce one or shall I just switch it on later? - David Gerard (talk) 14:12, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- @David Gerard Just switch it on and I can announce and put up a sitenotice when that's done. :) — Dysk (contribs) 15:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- There is a warrant out for your arrest finally, you better get a good lawyer. What's gonna happen to you? Jail's a horrible place. — Oxyaena Harass 15:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- I am the law. — Dysk (contribs) 16:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'd say you're a pretty good simulation of the law... fooled me. Scottperry (talk) 18:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- Arrest warrant? What happened? Commie Lib (talk) 22:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- Imagine taking anything ever written here seriously. — Dysk (contribs) 15:07, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Arrest warrant? What happened? Commie Lib (talk) 22:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'd say you're a pretty good simulation of the law... fooled me. Scottperry (talk) 18:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- I am the law. — Dysk (contribs) 16:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- There is a warrant out for your arrest finally, you better get a good lawyer. What's gonna happen to you? Jail's a horrible place. — Oxyaena Harass 15:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Why...
...haven't you been responding to me on discord? I need someone to talk to, and it feels like you're giving me the cold shoulder. :/ — Oxyaena Harass 14:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- I haven't been chatting a lot outside some routine stuff. :/ — Dysk (contribs) 18:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)