User talk:Kar rational
Your edits to India
I reverted them because they were full of simple errors in syntax (" although has involved in terrorist acts ") and spacing. Please give it a proper proofreading and reinsert as you will. Polar Bear In the Jungle Peter Tosh > Bob Marley 14:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Removing "openly homophobic"
"Woo in India"
Again, you need to start a conversation before removing material. If you do it again, I will have to lock the article. Please bring up your objections on the talk page. Polar Bear In the Jungle Peter Tosh > Bob Marley 14:47, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- Please stop making major changes to the India article, like deleting whole sections, without prior discussion. Please discuss your concerns & suggested changed on the talk page: talk:India. WëäŝëïöïďMethinks it is a Weasel 14:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Greetings, sorry for inconvenience. It was my first edit actually. Please respond so we can continue talk. 'Woo in India'- Please explain what that means. Witchcraft blamed on some rural women - no relations with Ayurveda, it is actually called Tantra practiced by infamous Tantrics. 'Openly homophobic'- give reference. --Kar rational (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. Polar Bear In the Jungle Peter Tosh > Bob Marley 14:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- I apologize again, but I'm not a vandal.
- How may I convince you to display my edits. --Kar rational (talk) 15:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- == Woo in India == - First of all,this heading is meaningless. This paragraph is filled with incorrect statements and which obviously have no references.
== Openly homophobic == - In the paragraph titled Gay-rights, it was stated that BJP is openly homophobic.This is factually incorrect blatant accusation without any reference.
== Politics == - I had improved this section and deleted other incorrect statements which were without references.--Kar rational (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)