User talk:LobPo

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, LobPo! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Ho. No doubt you will read the links above so that you will know what we are about.--Weirdstuff (talk) 14:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

ok dude

Either yoy're joking and don't realize you aren't being funny or you're serious and should fuck off this site until you stop advocating for eugenics & genocide. either way: stop it. --Miekal 17:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

I second this. Advocates for genocide are not welcome here. --Castaigne (talk) 16:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

I'd assume he needs treatment. That's if he's joking (not funny) or serious (definitely not funny). Scream!! (talk) 17:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

" Advocates for genocide are not welcome here". Wrong. They get to get their (moronic) say so, just like anyone else and the public ridicule that goes along with it - in my opinion. ScepticWombat (talk) 19:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

That sounds less "welcome here" and more "allowed, barely tolerated" here--Miekal 20:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to the metaphorical stocks, you mean? PacWalker 21:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

ScepticWombat, you forgot to mention the end part, where banning usually results from Coop action after said genocide advocate goes bug-fuck from the constant reverts and begins vandalizing/attempting to block everywhere on the excuse that we are all INSERT GENOCIDE FIXATION HERE trying to prevent him/her from speaking truth to power. --Castaigne (talk) 23:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Whut? Wėąṣėḷőįď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 00:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Castaigne, so far, I've seen nothing to suggest that LobPo is about to go "bug-fuck", but simply a fascinating level of absolute cluelessness about why the suggestions (s)he proposes are both odious and idiotic (i.e. they won't work even if they were feasible). LobPo seems to be genuinely completely ignorant about the current and historical events all of which clearly indicate that LobPo's ideas of "fascist imperialism in (pseudo-)liberal wrappings" would be a disaster of the first order for the U.S. as well as the potential victims. The level of this ignorance is truly astounding, and I think it real because of the apparently authentic baffledness of LobPo's questions when confronted when fairly basic objections to his/her silly ideas. ScepticWombat (talk) 06:36, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm not convinced I believe LobPo is honestly ignorant (Hanlon's razor be damned), but I will agree that he seems more likely to continue doing his thing than going on a shitfest vandalism spree or similar, so hey. I say let sheeping goats lie... or something... PacWalker 07:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

No, his presentation convinces me that the ignorance is feigned and that he is trolling. The truly ignorant react differently in my experience. Eventually, he will go on a spree of some type, be it tomorrow or two years from now. --Castaigne (talk) 01:21, 5 April 2015 (UTC)