User talk:Tmtoulouse/Archive10

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


You where the one who crashed RW? Elassint Throw things at me

yep. tmtoulouse irritate 20:24, 12 November 2007 (EST)
Crash! At least it wasn't for long... did you install a new toy? humanUser talk:Human 20:31, 12 November 2007 (EST)
I am playing with idea of only letting anonymous IPs and brand new registered users edit pages "x" times per "y" unit of time to control the amount of damage a vandal can do. tmtoulouse irritate 20:32, 12 November 2007 (EST)
I suggest 3 per hour, and first 72 hours on board. Exception: let them edit their own user and talk page? Possible? How about a way to promote a new user past the restriction if we "trust" them? humanUser talk:Human 20:47, 12 November 2007 (EST)
PS, great idea!!! humanUser talk:Human 20:55, 12 November 2007 (EST)
This idea is terrible. Bohdan 22:12, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Interesting. Cool idea. How about reseting any users to "new user status" if they receive a block longer that, say, 30 minutes.--Bobbing up 04:36, 14 November 2007 (EST)
Good idea, Bob. How about 31 minutes 42 seconds as the "cutoff"? humanUser talk:Human 15:27, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Oh noes! I tried to go to "recent changes" and got this:

Warning: require_once(extensions/DynamicPageList/DynamicPageList2.php) [function.require-once]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/rationa1/public_html/wiki/LocalSettings.php on line 206 Fatal error: require_once() [function.require]: Failed opening required 'extensions/DynamicPageList/DynamicPageList2.php' (include_path='/home/rationa1/public_html/wiki:/home/rationa1/public_html/wiki/includes:/home/rationa1/public_html/wiki/languages:.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/rationa1/public_html/wiki/LocalSettings.php on line 206

ugg! is it my computer/browser/whatever? im using netscape 9.0 on this comp. oh, and where are the cute little buttons for stuff like "blockquote"? i cant find them, help! thanx Refugeetalk page 21:28, 14 November 2007 (EST)

update: nevermind. it seems to be working ok now. i guess I didnt break it after all, lol. Refugeetalk page 21:31, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Ha, prefect timing on your part I guess, there was a 3 second window when I copied in the new DPL version for an extension upgrade and for that span of time the settings would "break" just hit it on the money I guess. 21:32, 14 November 2007 (EST)

oh ok, relief! thought i broke it, lol. Refugeetalk page 21:36, 14 November 2007 (EST)

What have you done?[edit]

I tried to add a question with your new voting system to the main page. It showed up fine on the template page, but not on the main page, it said there was an error of some sort. Obviously, this is your fault, and it speaks volumes about your lack of skills. Can you fix this, or is it beyond your simple level? Thanks in advance, Bohdan 22:05, 13 November 2007 (EST)

The voting system is essentially a hack designed for a specific purpose, both the extension and the templates I am using are not really extendable beyond WIGO. If for some reason we see a future use for the system beyond WIGO I can think about creating a more general purpose system. In the mean time you could create one and I will install it. 22:49, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Once again, you respond to me calling you out for your foolishness without logging in. Why are you so ashamed? Are you still troubled by your schooling? "In the mean time you could create one and I will install it." I am not going to do your work for you, former CP sysop. Now go, if you have the skills, and fix the problem. Bohdan 23:40, 13 November 2007 (EST)
No response? Is that the way you get out of fixing problems? Please, do the work you are required to do! Bohdan 00:12, 14 November 2007 (EST)
How can I be expected to do the work with all these distractions you give me! tmtoulouse irritate 00:14, 14 November 2007 (EST)
Enough of your pathetic excuses! I am going to request a community ban against you. Bohdan 00:16, 14 November 2007 (EST) spilled water on TK and hes melting...mellllllting. 00:19, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Why haven't solved the problem yet? Are you lazy, or just stooopid? I will get the community ban discussion started.Bohdan 15:05, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Both. 15:23, 14 November 2007 (EST)
Thanks for admitting what was obviously true. And again, you answer me without logging in! What a coward! Now fix the problem this instant, or its going to be ban time. Bohdan 15:25, 14 November 2007 (EST)

User page[edit]

Please lock my user page to prevent liberal deceit and libel. Godspeed. Aschlafly 16:28, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Hm, I am conflicted about this......I guess its our policy to allow protection of user namespace pages (people do it for their sigs, ect. and we do it for retired users)......but if you really want to see libel check out Andrew Schlafly. tmtoulouse irritate 17:25, 14 November 2007 (EST)
The only vandalism has been by an anon IP. Protect from IP's perhaps?--Bobbing up 17:28, 14 November 2007 (EST)
I dunno, I don't think its a big deal the only person that should edit it is Aschlafly or whoever this is..........and they want it protected............I open to suggestions though if others wish to chime in. tmtoulouse irritate 17:32, 14 November 2007 (EST)
I'm cool with it - but if it becomes common, it'll mean people looking for a sysop each time they want to edit their own user page. But for one unusual user, I suppose it makes no big difference.--Bobbing up 17:35, 14 November 2007 (EST)
I would say that protection should only exist for user pages that will remain stagnant and not change either by choice of the user or through retirement. If there is a need to unlock a page it should not be locked again for awhile after. tmtoulouse irritate 17:36, 14 November 2007 (EST)
I agree. Unless you could break the software so that only the user in question can edit their user page/subspace, which would be sorta cool, but spoil things for our internal vandals. humanUser talk:Human 17:47, 14 November 2007 (EST)

wigo button images[edit]

I uploaded a couple of redgreen arrows, that are 15x15, but your program is making them 25x25 - can you fix dat sometime? Thanks!

Also, would we prefer leaf green to lime green? Easy to change... humanUser talk:Human 18:46, 14 November 2007 (EST)

done and uhhhhhhhh I don't do "colors" :). tmtoulouse irritate 19:02, 14 November 2007 (EST)
Cool, thanks. If anyone complains about the lime green I'll fix. Or if I get sick of it myself. Ooh ooh, how about putting the "number" in the middle of the arrows... </bad idea> oh, never mind, that would uglify it due to different number widths... humanUser talk:Human 20:40, 14 November 2007 (EST)
I think one should be spindrift and the other crimson :). --Linus(plot evil tech) 23:23, 14 November 2007 (EST)
Apparently my color discrimination skills are vastly below normal, I was totally happy with a box of 16 crayons when my cousin always need the 1000 color box. tmtoulouse irritate 23:27, 14 November 2007 (EST)
This admission explains so much about your character. Bohdan 01:37, 15 November 2007 (EST)
Linus, feel free to send me the hex for those colors and I will reload. humanUser talk:Human 01:34, 15 November 2007 (EST)
Well, I was kind of joking :).
Anyway, now that I think about it, they would look awful together. --Linus(plot evil tech) 11:54, 15 November 2007 (EST)


Tmt - what version of dpl have we got? Unless I'm doing something really stupid (which is quite possible) it appears to be 1.3.1 and doesn't recognise "uses" or "include". Susan... purrrrrr ... 20:18, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Do we need an upgrade then? 21:09, 14 November 2007 (EST)
It's up to 1.5.2 now so possibly - of course it is very likely it's me what's messing it up but it can't hurt, can it? Susan... purrrrrr ... 21:22, 14 November 2007 (EST)
I just updated it, do you want me to take a look at what your working on or still want to play yourself? 21:31, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Gimme 5 & then look @ User:SusanG/alpha Susan... purrrrrr ... 21:38, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Who's a clever bugger then :-) thanx kiss kiss.

THANKS -little bit more tweaking & it works now - what do you think to it? Susan... purrrrrr ... 22:47, 14 November 2007 (EST) (tell me tomorrow) Susan... purrrrrr ...


You do realize your breakin teh rules by editing someone elses userpage right? Elassint Throw things at me 19:49, 15 November 2007 (EST)

Absolutely, and no one is above the law, feel free to block me if you like and revert my edits. tmtoulouse irritate 19:50, 15 November 2007 (EST)
Show me precisely which rule we're breaking. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
An editor's User page space is inviolable; they are free to do with it what they want, and no one should edit it without permission. OK maybe its not a "official" rule, but still....... Elassint Throw things at me 20:13, 15 November 2007 (EST)
Hah! I made that up. You do whatever I say now? Sheesh.... humanUser talk:Human 20:21, 15 November 2007 (EST)

My userpage[edit]

why isent it redirecting? i want it to redirect to loser.

It won't work because the file "loser" does not exist. Why not redirect to user:StupidIdiot, which I do believe exists? humanUser talk:Human 18:15, 17 November 2007 (EST)


I'd like to be promoted. With school and my other addictions, I just can't put as much time in here as I'd like to. I'm by no means leaving, as I hope to continue editing, but I'm not around enough anymore to warrant being a sysop. Thanks, and don't forget your apostrophes. ThunderkatzHo! 12:00, 18 November 2007 (EST)

Don't go Thunder! Susan... miaow ... 13:01, 18 November 2007 (EST)
I'm not going. I'm just cutting back. ThunderkatzHo! 15:18, 18 November 2007 (EST)

I'm of the opinion that you don't have to do anything to warrant being a sysop other than have been here for a while, and been a good dude(-ette). Since that hasn't changed, I don't think we should desysop inactive users... the only thing we should do is maybe promote a new sysop.-αmεσ (tailor) 13:27, 18 November 2007 (EST)


Do you by any chance feel like blocking spambot? DickTurpis 19:29, 20 November 2007 (EST)


Don't forget to drop by the party! humanUser talk:Human 19:40, 20 November 2007 (EST)

smoke damage[edit]

Did you ever implement that "new user slowdown" feature? Wuz they even "new"? humanUser talk:Human 16:20, 21 November 2007 (EST)

No, there are some complications to the rate limiter (have to setup a caching server and some other stuff) that led me to put it on hold. tmtoulouse irritate 17:42, 21 November 2007 (EST)
While on the subject of anti-vandalism measures, I suppose there's no way that page blanking could be made a more tedious task? "Confirm" "Are you sure?" "Please wait 30 seconds." sort of stuff?
Anything is possible it just a matter of coding it and how well I can code. I am learning PHP by essentially trial and error and back tracking through wiki code to a pain in the ass. I will mull over the idea. tmtoulouse irritate 13:15, 23 November 2007 (EST)
Surely all a wandal would need to do is delete all but 1 (or 2, or 3 ... ) word to circumvent. Susan... miaow ... 13:26, 23 November 2007 (EST)
True, just trying to think of something to slow down our vandal, troll, sysop.--Bobbing up 13:32, 23 November 2007 (EST)
Pintos? --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi!
And as to my question below...... Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 13:34, 23 November 2007 (EST)

If I wrote a quick rate limiting module that uses the PingLimiter hook, could you install it? If you have control over the software that runs on the server, I could use shared memory to make it reasonably fast at least up to a few tens of thousands of requests a second. --JeεvsYour signature uses all my CPU time... 13:41, 23 November 2007 (EST)

I have got root access to everyone RW is on. I run the webserver for it. If you can code something lets see if we can do it. The built in ratelimiter requires memcache and I havent gotten around to setting that up. tmtoulouse irritate 14:56, 23 November 2007 (EST)

Something i don't understand...[edit]

I just saw you unblock people who had just posted (and thus could not have been blocked). I'm totally confused. Researcher 21:28, 21 November 2007 (EST)

Do you mean EIassint? It's a different user, an impostor. tmtoulouse irritate 21:30, 21 November 2007 (EST)
Ah, when editing this page I see the difference. And, let me guess, PaIMD? Researcher 21:36, 21 November 2007 (EST)
Same checking the "contribs" of a user you can see pretty quickly when they are an impostor. The whole "block log purge" thing is my obsessive compulsive hangover from CP. tmtoulouse irritate 21:38, 21 November 2007 (EST)

Just curious[edit]

Is there any tool(or anything else for that matter) floating around the internet that would allow us to revert all edits of a user in one go? Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 15:11, 22 November 2007 (EST)

We could use it to revert all of NightTrain's edits! Give TK a taste of his own medicine. Nah... jk... power must be used respectfully.... dammit... also, Trent, I think I just added you on facebook... either you or some other dude with your name... creepy.-αmεσ (tailor) 00:29, 23 November 2007 (EST)
there are probably extensions for it, do we need it? Rollback seems to do the job pretty quick. tmtoulouse irritate 14:55, 23 November 2007 (EST)
True, just thought it would make things easier with all of the vandals we've been getting lately. Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 15:28, 23 November 2007 (EST)

i seem to have a bit more time on my hands[edit]

you have anything i can get my teeth into? airdish 03:36, 23 November 2007 (EST)

I am not really sure, I have been in and out as the semester workload ebbs and flows.........any non-cp related articles or work is always helpful and also all the articles under Category:Very short article need to be sorted. tmtoulouse irritate 13:13, 23 November 2007 (EST)


Tmt, I got that error:

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 262190 bytes) in /home/rationa1/public_html/wiki/includes/StringUtils.php on line 296

While returning from cp to 'recent changes' Susan... miaow ... 13:02, 23 November 2007 (EST)

Fuck. tmtoulouse irritate 13:14, 23 November 2007 (EST)

Helios wuz here[edit]

As long as I'm here, I thought I'd drop by to say hi. ɧєɭıסş-get sunburn! 01:02, 10 December 2007 (EST)

Now I am sure[edit]

I know you are a sock (or puppetmaster) now. In eight days you have made two edits [1]: one to say you were in New Mexico (?) and one to vote against HG. How convenient that you somehow make this one edit the night the vote starts, and yet you make no other edits. You have destroyed the so-called "mob" system by cheating. Your vote needs to be rejected. There is obviously puppetry going on. But who else is involved? Is this really User:AmesG? User:Human? Or do you have an explanation? Bohdan 16:45, 13 December 2007 (EST)

  • I am still waiting. You better have a good explanation, or your account will be blocked. Bohdan 00:59, 14 December 2007 (EST)
    • Check with Colin first, troll! humanUser talk:Human 02:19, 14 December 2007 (EST)
I thought Colin was being held by the FBI in Guantánamo?--Bobbing up 06:04, 15 December 2007 (EST)
Whats the matter, tmtoulose? Its been two days. Why havent you answered? I am so close to blocking your account right now... Bohdan 01:39, 15 December 2007 (EST)

Bohdan, stop talking to yourself.-αmεσ (tailor) 02:00, 15 December 2007 (EST)

Don't get all cocky "Ames". There is a good chance your account will be blocked as well. Bohdan 03:07, 15 December 2007 (EST)
Bohdan, I really hate saying this to people, but will you shut your mouth with the shithouse excuses to ban innocent users? --Cheers,Ryanǂ wuz here ǂ 03:35, 15 December 2007 (EST)
None of these users are innocent. Bohdan 03:52, 15 December 2007 (EST)
Look, you just came out of nowhere and claimed these 3 people were the same person. I have one word to respong to this: Bullshit. --Cheers,Ryanǂ wuz here ǂ 04:02, 15 December 2007 (EST)
Lets wait for Tmtoulouse to comment. Then we shall see. Bohdan 04:04, 15 December 2007 (EST)
Ryan, you do realize that Bohdan is our resident vandal and pet goat, right? That nothing he says is serious, and is all part of an ongoing attempt to bring the site down through confusion and laughter? Just making sure. humanUser talk:Human 16:16, 15 December 2007 (EST)
Human, you do realize that Ryan cannot stand idiots who make shit up, right? --Cheers,Ryanǂ wuz here ǂ 17:08, 15 December 2007 (EST)
Which one of us idiots who make shit up are you referring to? humanUser talk:Human 17:16, 15 December 2007 (EST)
Bohdan. --Cheers,Ryanǂ wuz here ǂ 17:43, 15 December 2007 (EST)

You know what they say.... if you give a goat a carrot...-αmεσ (tailor) 17:42, 15 December 2007 (EST)


Hey, don't mention it. I've encountered quite a few of these nutters on the Internet, I figure it's the least I can do to give others fair warning of their tactics. --Wet Walnuts 18:51, 18 December 2007 (EST)

Block your self now[edit]

You have refused to explain your actions. I demand that you give me your powers, and then block your self for infinite duration. Do it for the integrity of the wiki. Bohdan 20:34, 18 December 2007 (EST)


Do you want to be a sysop at RWW? I can make you one if you want. -- 02:10, 27 December 2007 (EST)

My hunger for power knows no bounds! With every wiki that grants my sysops powers I become one step closer to my dreams of global domination......with that in mind it is up to you! tmtoulouse irritate 02:12, 27 December 2007 (EST)
Seriously tmt, why don't you respond to me? Are you afraid? Of getting schooled? Please, just block yourself. user:Bohdan 02:47, 27 December 2007 (EST)
Bohdan, get over it. It's not hurting anybody. --Cheers,RyanIcons-flag-au.pngǂ wuz here ǂ 03:06, 27 December 2007 (EST)
Ryan, get it through your head: Bohdan can do whatever the hell he wants, and no amount of complaining from you will change that. Pinto's5150 Talk 03:08, 27 December 2007 (EST)
I never fucking said that he couldn't. I'm complaining because he has to make a big freaking deal over this shit. --Cheers,RyanIcons-flag-au.pngǂ wuz here ǂ 03:28, 27 December 2007 (EST)
  • Gentlemen, lets calm down. Tmt will be along shortly and will straighten all this up. user:Bohdan
I just wish whatever his username is supposed to be would stop being so goddamn hostile. Hostility makes me hostile. --Cheers,RyanIcons-flag-au.pngǂ wuz here ǂ 03:33, 27 December 2007 (EST)
Are you talking about the pintobean/locke guy? user:Bohdan 03:35, 27 December 2007 (EST)
yeah him --Cheers,RyanIcons-flag-au.pngǂ wuz here ǂ 03:36, 27 December 2007 (EST)
I always knew him as Pinto bean, but I guess he now prefers "Locke". he does seem a little hostile in his post above, but I think he was just joking. user:Bohdan 03:38, 27 December 2007 (EST)
I really doubt it for some reason. --Cheers,RyanIcons-flag-au.pngǂ wuz here ǂ 03:39, 27 December 2007 (EST)
I was joking with the hostility(It's 1:40, What can I say), and just for my stupidity, I will now block Bohdan. Pinto's5150 Talk 03:41, 27 December 2007 (EST)
You're not on my approved block list. user:Bohdan 03:41, 27 December 2007 (EST)
I guess because it's only 7:42 pm here I find it hard to understand language of 1:40 :P --Cheers,RyanIcons-flag-au.pngǂ wuz here ǂ 03:42, 27 December 2007 (EST)
  • Yeah, everyone is happy! :) user:Bohdan 03:45, 27 December 2007 (EST)
I get in to arguments like this all the time. They all get solved the same way... --Cheers,RyanIcons-flag-au.pngǂ wuz here ǂ 03:58, 27 December 2007 (EST)
By discussing time zones? user:Bohdan 04:22, 27 December 2007 (EST)
Kind of :P --Cheers,RyanIcons-flag-au.pngǂ wuz here ǂ 05:58, 27 December 2007 (EST)

Saving pages?[edit]

Since Conservapedia tends to erase, not just pages, but the history of pages containing anything embarrassing, why don't we make an effort to save pages that are likely to suffer such a fate. By "save" I mean right clicking and going to "Save Page As...". (Assuming you're a Windows user. I don't know about Macs or Linux.) Later we can upload them (assuming it's possible to upload an entire page) onto RationalWiki under the Conservapedia namespace. Or perhaps under a new namespace; "Evidence", or some such name. Thoughts? --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 16:40, 27 December 2007 (EST)

Or edit/view source and copy the content to a txt file? humanUser talk:Human 16:48, 27 December 2007 (EST)
By the way, I think we have some stuff at Conservapedia:Burning the Evidence. Or not... humanUser talk:Human 16:49, 27 December 2007 (EST)

new bot for you to build, run, and then heartlessly destroy[edit]

Can you make a bot that finds all iterations of {{welcome}} that use two arguments, and in each case delete the first one and its pipe symbol? Because if you can, we can simplify the welcome template. If possible you might want to restrict the bot to "user talk" space for safety.

Oh, and can you also make a bot called "Bender"? It might come in handy from time to time. humanUser talk:Human 17:31, 30 December 2007 (EST)

(bump) Perhaps after you help the wigo people? humanUser talk:Human 17:55, 8 January 2008 (EST)

[[cp: ]][edit]

Can you make it so the inter-wiki links to Conservapedia are tagged "nofollow". Right now we are boosting their google rank which is a terrible crime towards the rest of sane humanity. - Icewedge 09:07, 31 December 2007 (EST)

general reply[edit]

I will be back going strong in about a week and can address all of these issues then. tmtoulouse irritate 11:06, 31 December 2007 (EST)

  • Hey, what luck I just logged in and I see you making edits. DO NOT IGNORE THIS. I AM SECONDS AWAY FROM BLOCKING YOU. Now please, calmly tell me whatever it was that I wanted to know earlier. user talk:Bohdan 01:57, 2 January 2008 (EST)

Did dPl Leave?[edit]

I know you won't get this for a while, but what happened to DPL? I swear it was under special pages, but I can't find it. Moved, deleted, eaten, what? Or am I just absurdly blind and stupid? ThunderkatzHo! 16:51, 4 January 2008 (EST)

It's still here and active (easy to verify - those green talk page archive link boxes *points up* rely on it). Dunno if we have Special pages about it here, but I always just used the manual for reference. --Sid 16:59, 4 January 2008 (EST)
Thanks. I was so used to using DPL from a special page (that's what I was looking for btw, anyone know what I'm talking about?) that I forgot you could just use DPL in the coding of a regular page. ThunderkatzHo! 17:07, 4 January 2008 (EST)

You mean the graphic (GUI) version of dpl, I think. Seems to have vanished, possibly when we went to RW 2.1? Susanclaw! ... 17:24, 4 January 2008 (EST)

The GUI interface was depreciated (abandoned) in later releases of the extension. I think there is 3rd 3rd party way to set it up but do we really need it? tmtoulouse irritate 14:57, 8 January 2008 (EST)

Narr! SusanHelp I'm being haunted by TK 15:01, 8 January 2008 (EST)
Narr as well (I guess narr is the opposite of arr). I was just wondering what happened, and now I know I'm not crazy. Well, that's what the voices in my head tell me. ThunderkatzHo! 15:19, 11 January 2008 (EST)


The december archive still has voting arrows. Is there a simple way to strip the template off and replace 180-odd code numbers with 'sterisks? humanUser talk:Human 22:39, 11 January 2008 (EST)


I'm working with Linus (OK, he's really doing everything) to make the rationalblogs more useful and to hopefully go live with more of it. There's no traffic probs if I migrate over? Also, if it lets me incorporate AdSense or something like that, it might help pay---i'm up to about 600 visits a day average (unique visitors less).

There's still bugs to work out, though.--PalMD-Mmmm...Brains! 18:23, 12 January 2008 (EST)

Block yourself[edit]

Always Watching...

You have been told numerous times to block yourself for cheating in mob votes. Please do it. Or else I will have to. user talk:Bohdan 21:22, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Maybe tomorrow. 21:24, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Once again, you log out when I am trying to discuss your cheating. user talk:Bohdan 21:25, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Your just paranoid. 21:29, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Is this IP even tmtoulouse? user talk:Bohdan 21:30, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get you. Pinto's5150 Talk 21:30, 16 January 2008 (EST)
The ironic thing is the only one that could say for sure is Tmtoulouse. 21:32, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Why won't the real, logged in tmtoulouse speak to me? Is he afraid I will school him like O'Leary did (and did she ever). user talk:Bohdan 21:43, 16 January 2008 (EST)

You really O'Leary's sock aren't you? 21:45, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Perhaps. Stop logging out. user talk:Bohdan 21:46, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Okay. Etaroced 21:47, 16 January 2008 (EST)
  • Did you see the sweet template for the non-materialist neuroscience article?
The author of this article was schooled by Denyse O'Leary.

user talk:Bohdan 21:48, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Sweet. But no..Etaroced 21:50, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Ohhh, two periods. Looks like someone is perverting the English language... user talk:Bohdan 21:50, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Mismanagement perhaps but not perversion. Etaroced 21:51, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Still it is misuse, and that requires a block. But since this was not as serious as a perversion, you can block a different user (like Pinto), and call it good. user talk:Bohdan 21:55, 16 January 2008 (EST)
I do not have blocking rights. Etaroced 21:57, 16 January 2008 (EST)


  • Why didn't we comment Denyse O'Leary's arguments out of existence?-αmεσ (tailor) 22:00, 16 January 2008 (EST)
  • Que? Etaroced 22:00, 16 January 2008 (EST)
  • No, tmtoulouse cried after I made clear to him he was schooled. user talk:Bohdan 22:01, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Did we just find out about this today?-αmεσ (tailor) 22:03, 16 January 2008 (EST)

No, I commented on her blog and she refused to post them. But there was nothing to reply to, she didnt make a single argument. Etaroced 22:03, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Then I don't really think we got schooled, Bohdan...-αmεσ (tailor) 22:06, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Ames, you didn't get schooled, Tmtoulouse did. user talk:Bohdan 22:34, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Probably because your only response was to call her a parasite (how rational). user talk:Bohdan 22:05, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Huh sure...Etaroced 22:05, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Should we make a side-by-side? Granted she seems to be mostly ad hominem.-αmεσ (tailor) 22:06, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Thats pretty ironic ames. user talk:Bohdan 22:07, 16 January 2008 (EST)
She is a well known fucktard, but it might require refutation.--PalMD-Did that sound a little harsh? 22:26, 16 January 2008 (EST)
Heh. Yeah, she really seems all ad hominem. user talk:Bohdan
You misunderstand. She happens to be a fucktard. She is also someone who is notorious, as she shows in her post,for having very weak powers of reasoning.--PalMD-Did that sound a little harsh? 23:02, 16 January 2008 (EST)

The King has returned![edit]

Yay! --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום

Welcome back! Did you ever get my e-mail(s)? --Linus(plot evil tech) 13:05, 18 January 2008 (EST)
Yea, I have been slacking let me see if I can change it back now. tmtoulouse irritate 13:05, 18 January 2008 (EST)


While moving to RC:

"Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_IF, expecting ')' in /home/rationa1/public_html/wiki/LocalSettings.php on line 51" SusanPurrrrrrr 14:14, 18 January 2008 (EST)

This is your last warning[edit]

Stop hand.png Please don't vandalize this site as you did here. Next time you do, your account will be blocked. user talk:Bohdan 00:32, 20 January 2008 (EST)

LOL --Cheers, RyanIcons-flag-au.pngǂ wuz here ǂ 01:24, 20 January 2008 (EST)


Sorry about relocating Tom Cruise so quickly without discussion. I was just about to move it back after reconsidering. That was rather trigger-happy of me. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:05, 23 January 2008 (EST)

No worries. tmtoulouse irritate 15:07, 23 January 2008 (EST)
By the way... I don't believe you've taken the test yet, have you? Come on, everybody's doing it. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:09, 23 January 2008 (EST)
Including Bohdan, TK, and 3 or 4 Andrew Schlaflies! humanUser talk:Human 15:55, 23 January 2008 (EST)

He's Right[edit]

"(Block log); 05:00 . . Radioactive afikomen (Talk | contribs) (blocked "User:Tmtoulouse" with an expiry time of 271 seconds (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled): Having a username which produces great difficulty in pronunciation.)"

He's absolutely right.

As RA would say, you evil fruitcake! -- kjm.rt  00:34, 30 January 2008 (EST)

It is not THAT hard just pull out the pieces so its " 't' 'm' 'toulouse'" and toulouse is easy enough, the ancestral rhyme that has descended many generations in my family is "not too tight but too loose." Which is why my cousins marriage announcement in the news paper made it on to Jay Leno it was the "toulouse-weiner wedding." tmtoulouse irritate 00:37, 30 January 2008 (EST)
I have trouble with the "Tmt", the rest is fine. -- kjm.rt  00:49, 30 January 2008 (EST)
...Because "-oulouse", as everyone knows, is not only easy to pronounce, it's even a real word. </sarcasm> --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:07, 30 January 2008 (EST)
It's the initials that throw a person off. I keep wanting to pronounce your name "tumultuous". --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:07, 30 January 2008 (EST)
I prefer mangling it as "Timmy Too Loose". But it's really pronounced "Trent". humanUser talk:Human 12:28, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Its actually prononced "t" - "m" - "I got schooled by denise o'leary" user talk:Bohdan 23:03, 31 January 2008 (EST)