User talk:Umlaut
Dear ÄÖÜ, I liked your entries at CP - and, of course, your name larronsicut fur in nocte
"Umlaut" (your insulting name is getting tiresome), I've analyzed your unconcise replies and you are unlike 99% of evolutionists, who avoid the Bible like the plague and even discourage others from reading it, so there's a 95% chance you're against Conservapedia. You also clearly deny that chivalry was and is an ideal for all to strive for. It is very effective in reducing and eliminating friction, insults, hard-feelings, and accidents, not to mention that it helps resist rape. The answer to your silly question is this: the beauty of logic is that it doesn't matter who accepts or denies it. The logic remains as truthful regardless. Hate to ruin these liberals' fun here, but there's no money in standing up for the truth. Go back to Wikipedia, where censors delete conservative information daily.--Aschlafly 05:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. This little episode has reinforced three things- many people are stupid (Mr. Schafly, TK), not all conservatives are (Philip J. Rayment), and that even if I was a conservative, I wouldn't touch Conservapedia with a 10-metre pole. I don't know how new this is, but TK is banning people, such as me, for "liberal last-wordism", defined as disagreeing with him or aschafly.
Greetings, Umlaut, and welcome to RationalWiki! I take it you're another refugee from Hurricane Schlafly? Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 19:15, 2 March 2009 (EST)
- Yep, though in this case it was TK's rabid defense of him.Umlaut 19:38, 2 March 2009 (EST)
- Ah, TK... Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:30, 2 March 2009 (EST)