There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Yip
Please leave British - English spellings alone. & what's wrong with "Proferring? :) ContribsTalk 10:40, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
you should prolly think about takin' it to the talk pages, friend...PFoster 11:13, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- Well-seeing as this guy is a sock of Ed Poor, I don't see why you shouldn't be. NOTE: SINCE ED POOR THINKS EVERYONE IS A SOCK OF AMES,I SUGGEST WE DO THE SAME THING TO NEW EDITORS HERE. PFoster 11:22, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
Ed Poor? LOL! PFoster, you suck at identifying socks with their puppet masters, I bet you could not even tell the difference between a sockpuppet that you made between a sock of a vandal account. Really. --Yip 14:33, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- ...tell the difference between a sockpuppet that you made between a sock of a vandal account. And you suck at composing sentences at a fourth-grade level. Want to trade? PFoster 14:36, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- I'm not surer how to trade abilities over the internet. And why do you use British insults? Is it a statement on how "liberal" you are, like removing checkuser, spelling EVERYTHING in British, and blocking trolls for like 1 or 2 hours for tearing up the entire site?! --Yip 14:42, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- Maybe. --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 14:45, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- Surer? It's 'cause we're British (at this time of day); Wazzock!
ContribsTalk 14:47, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- Eh, I don't care if your British, but why would you remove Checkuser? --Yip 14:51, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- Respect for users' privacy? Why the hell do you care, anyway? PFoster 14:52, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- I'm sure that Checkuser is a good tool, but looking at CP's use of it has made it dirty. It kinda has that goose-stepping vibe to it now. --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 14:54, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- Respect for users' privacy? Why the hell do you care, anyway? PFoster 14:52, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- Eh, I don't care if your British, but why would you remove Checkuser? --Yip 14:51, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- Surer? It's 'cause we're British (at this time of day); Wazzock!
ALL YOUVE BEEN DOING IS TALK TALK TALK ACHLAFLY 14:55, 18 April 2008 (EDT)
- Andy, stop bothering these nice people. JSCHLAFLY 14:58, 18 April 2008 (EDT)