|The Atheist's Guide To|
|More about atheism|
Secular religion is a term referring to ideologies or philosophies that have no spiritual, supernatural, or religious components but which the speaker claims mimic the forms of religious institutions.
 Atheism as a religion
This is one of the most commonly encountered examples of this trend. Critics of atheism, usually conservative Christians, assert that atheism itself is a religious belief. It is somewhat bizarre that people who cherish so strongly the sanctity of their own beliefs should characterize something so alien to them as being a religion. One possibility is that they are so entrenched in their own religious mindset that they are unable to comprehend the idea of a non-religious belief. More likely, though, is that they believe they are pointing out some deep hypocrisy, in that atheists claim to reject religion while actually practicing it.
For atheism to be considered a religion involves stretching the definition of religion to its loosest possible meaning - something like "a belief based on faith", in this case faith that there is no God. Even this is tenuous, for while some atheists have a strong conviction (arguably equivalent to religious faith) that God does not exist, an atheistic (or at least agnostic) viewpoint can also be achieved from taking the scientific (and therefore irreligious) attitude of only accepting as real things that are observable based on evidence. The argument can be further refuted by analogy. If disbelief in God is a religion, then so is disbelief in the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, unicorns and leprechauns. The comparisons "Atheism is a religion like baldness is a hair color" and "Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby" are also commonly used.
In fact, of the secular philosophies which are inaccurately described as religions, atheism is the least like a religion of all, since it does not dictate a specific worldview. Contrary to the assumptions of many creationists, atheism does not necessarily require an acceptance of the big bang theory or the evolution of the species; it predated both of these. All atheism requires is a single belief, that God does not exist, or, to view it another way, a lack of any belief that God does exist. Unlike religions, atheism does not require any specific activities or observances. Assessed against the criteria which make up most definitions of religion (belief in supernatural beings, worship, ritual, etc.), viewing atheism as a religion just doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Do any atheists believe themselves to be practicing a religion? It seems unlikely. The only times they tend to take this position are in very rare cases over civil rights issues or to exploit a legal loophole. For example, in 2005 a federal court of appeals ruled in favor of a prison inmate's right to start a 'religious' study group for atheists. Ironically but unsurprisingly, when atheism is labeled as a religion the loudest objections come from conservative Christians, in this case the American Family Association.
This criticism may not be totally off in every case, as in Alain de Botton's call to build "atheist temples", though in many ways that example represents a form of architectural oneupmanship with religion, which heretofore had a near-monopoly on impressive and awe-inspiring buildings.
While atheism is not a religion per se, one characteristic of the so-called "new atheism" is the fact that its proponents sometimes evangelize or proselytize in a manner reminiscent of some religious believers. For these "new atheists," it's not enough for them to not believe in God, they actively work to discourage other people from believing in God, too.
 Christian-originated secular religions
Unitarian Universalism is probably the closest thing to an organized religion that deliberately makes room for secularism. Unitarian Universalists are free to (in fact they must) create their own approach to religious belief and practice; for many of them, that means a religion with no concept of God/gods or the supernatural.
Many consider the Church of England to be asymptotically approaching being a secular religion, though it still looks like fire-breathing fundamentalism compared to those two.
 Civil religion
Those who decry "secular religions" often mean attributes often found in religions that secular ideologies, especially those aimed at improving the condition of humanity, sometimes acquire. Nationalism can serve this purpose. For example, there is little controversy about the messianic (in the larger sense) qualities of Marxism. The United States' foundation as a bastion of liberty and individual rights is also driven by a strong belief that these are good and essential to human happiness.
Both Marxist and Western democracies have civil religions. The former Soviet Union staged public parades that featured images of Marxist culture heroes, and even shrines for pilgrimage such as Lenin's tomb. The United States' civil religion is heavily inflected with Christian tropes: the nation is The New Jerusalem, The Shining City on a Hill. America also has mythology about its Founders and esteemed presidents, with memorials and landmarks visited by the patriotic/pious. Some Americans, such as Jehovah's Witnesses, refuse to recite The Pledge of Allegiance, claiming that it is idolatrous.
 Evolution as a religion
This is a favourite argument of creationists, who like to claim that the issue of evolution (or, as they call it, "evolutionism" or "Darwinism") versus creationism "is not science versus religion, but religion versus religion (the science of one religion versus the science of another religion)". An example comes from The Lie: Evolution by Ken Ham, but betrays a profound misunderstanding of both religion, which it defines only as a "cause, principle or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith" (quotemined from Webster's Dictionary), and evolution. Ham's ridiculous argument seems to be that nothing can be scientifically concluded from fossils/evidence since we can study them only in the present and have no direct access to their role in the past, unlike "the irrefutable evidence of the Scriptures", which were clearly written in the time of Ken Ham.
From a more rational perspective, it is clear that the evolution of species is a scientific theory, predicated on scientific foundations and with scientific applications. Even if its acceptance is considered to be a matter of personal faith, it does not meet any of the defining criteria to be considered a religion.
In May 2015, Kenneth Smith filed a lawsuit against the Jefferson County, West Virginia Board of Education, the National Institute of Health, and Department of Education, claiming that evolution was a religion, and that it was therefore unconstitutional for his daughter's public school to teach it as fact. The suit does not mention any case law (e.g., McLean v. Arkansas (1982), "it is clearly established in the case law, and perhaps also in common sense, that evolution is not a religion and that teaching evolution does not violate the Establishment Clause."), and is high in errors and low in facts. Kenneth Smith is apparently the same author of the racist-Christian The True Origin of Man (2013).
Philosophies drawn from "evolutionism" vary from social Darwinism to modern humanism. Some have more of a resemblance to religion, even if not meeting the full definition, but these are not part of the theory itself. Types of "evolutionism" that mimic religion often include notions that are decidedly anti-evolutionary or non-Darwinian. The notion of evolution as "progress," for example, heavily influenced thinkers such as Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and Herbert Spencer. Eugenics has often been characterized as a quasi-religious movement based on pseudo-evolutionary ideas. In fact, Charles Davenport, the grandaddy of eugenics in the US, produced a pamphlet titled "Eugenics as a Religion" that laid out a eugenic "creed." The movement became religious in the more literal sense as some Christian churches supported eugenics and held sermon contests for its promotion. In modern times, E.O. Wilson has advocated using evolution as the basis of a quasi-religious mythos he calls the "epic of evolution."
 Environmentalism and 'nature worship'
“”I studied anthropology in college, and one of the things I learned was that certain human social structures always reappear. They can't be eliminated from society. One of those structures is religion. Today it is said we live in a secular society in which many people---the best people, the most enlightened people---do not believe in any religion. But I think that you cannot eliminate religion from the psyche of mankind. If you suppress it in one form, it merely re-emerges in another form. You can not believe in God, but you still have to believe in something that gives meaning to your life, and shapes your sense of the world. Such a belief is religious.
Crichton controversially suggests that environmentalists look back to a fabled paradise state of Eden in which man lived in unity with nature, before deconstructing this idyllic view of nature which, in fact, few if any environmentalists have ever professed. Crichton points to a few similarities with religion, such as environmentalists' fear of 'apocalyptic' doom if humankind doesn't redress its 'sins' of pollution and destruction, before telling us that DDT and second-hand smoke are harmless. His argument that sustainability is put forward as a form of religious salvation makes little sense, since sustainability is a system for managing resources, having more in common with economics than with religion.
To its most devoted adherents, environmentalism may present a coherent, almost religious, worldview which is espoused with zealotry, but its core beliefs rest on scientific observations and theories (such as global warming, espoused by the "warmist cult") rather than the supernatural deities which characterise a religion. Conservatives often counter this by attempting to associate mainstream environmentalism with pagan worship of the goddess Gaia or Mother Earth. The point is to conflate the groups of hard greens and neopagans that subscribe to a sort of religious version of environmentalism with all environmentalism. These types often engage in magical thinking about the environment, such as subscribing to hard forms of the Gaia hypothesis. It may also include a form of "back to the land" romanticism or anarcho-primitivism such as that found in the works of John Zerzan. These brands of hard green environmentalism are more commonly found among hard-line Malthusians.
 Marxism as a religion
In former Communist countries, Marx was given a personality cult and was viewed as immune to criticism. Critics of communism were labelled as "counter-revolutionary criminals" and were jailed or even executed, which is analogous to execution of critics of state religion on charges of blasphemy in countries like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, etc. This took the form of the Gulag system and Great Purge in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin and the Cultural Revolution in China under Mao Zedong. According to "Empire" by Richard Kapuściński, in the Soviet Union the idea of creating a religion without a god was considered. However, during Stalin's rule his cult of personality effectively led to a religion in which Stalin played the role of a god. In God is not Great, Christopher Hitchens speaks of his loss of belief in Marxism as closely analogous to loss of religious belief.
While it displays similarities in such practices, Marxism lacks the supernatural beliefs (although the "force of history" is close) rituals and other common aspects of religions. However, in the North Korean offshoot of Marxism, according to official ideology there are miraculous beliefs related to the ruling family. For example the birth of Kim Jong-il was accompanied by winter changing into spring, a star illuminating the sky and a double rainbow spontaneously appearing. Marxism as a memeplex is analogous to the model of a religion, even including something of the transcendent (in its eventual goal of "class consciousness") and a mantra by which to dismiss or insult any doubter or unbeliever ("false consciousness").
 Liberalism as a religion
The most famous example of equating liberalism with religion is Ann Coulter's book, Godless: The Church of Liberalism (2006), in which she argued that liberalism has become America's "official state religion", complete with its own creation stories, gods, martyrs, clergy, doctrines and sacraments. The argument basically boils down to a familiar attack on the curricula and values taught in public schools, whose teachers Coulter regards as "clergy" baptising children into the cult of liberalism, and the alleged liberal bias of the media. It also involves lumping together many beliefs and stances, such as evolutionary theory and the pro-choice movement, which, although held by many liberals, are not part of a strict set of political or religious tenets. Furthermore, it takes a really warped stretch of the imagination to see abortions as religiously motivated "virgin sacrifices", as Coulter apparently does.
 The market as a religion
Extreme forms of "neoliberalism" have been characterized as "market-worship," or "market fundamentalism" (as possibly coined by Jeremy Seabrooke, and popularized by the nefarious George Soros). Ernest Partridge identifies the sacred text as Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, which explicates the all-powerful force of "The Invisible Hand" (even though Smith himself would disagree with this interpretation). He further identifies conservative and libertarian think tanks as "seminaries," pundits as the "priesthood," and the government as "the devil." The concept of the invisible hand has also been compared to intelligent design creationism.
 Transhumanism as a religion
Transhumanism has been characterized as a techno-utopian political ideology and a secular religion. The Singularity in particular has been derided as a "nerd rapture." Other quasi-religious concepts infest the philosophy, such as the Cartesian dualism implied by mind uploading and the quest for immortality in cryonics. Transhumanists themselves dismiss this as mere "pattern-matching".
 Personality cults
Personality cults that lack supernatural elements are often characterized as secular religions. See, e.g., Objectivism. Synanon, a drug treatment center with an authoritarian leader, even recognized its de facto status as a religion despite being a secular movement, and attempted in the mid-1970s to legally reorganize as the Church of Synanon.
 Atheistic Religions
Although atheism alone is not a religion, it is possible for an atheist to hold religious beliefs, and some religious sects or groups are largely nontheistic.
- Nontheist Friends are Quakers who do not believe in the personal God of the Bible.
- Many Theravada Buddhists lack belief in any deities in the traditional Western sense (the Buddha was not a god, although stories of his life often have supernatural aspects).
- Some traditional schools of Hinduism, such as Carvaka, Mimamsa and Samkhya, are generally compatible with atheism.
- LaVeyan Satanists almost exclusively deny the existence of God, but it's a very tongue-in-cheek "religion."
- Unitarian Universalists have diverse views of theology, but Atheists and otherly Non-Christians outnumber Christians within the church.
- There are various types of nontheistic Judaism. Beliefs usually range from strict adherence to the laws of the Torah without a belief in the Jewish god to those who simply were born into or participate in elements of Jewish culture, making it more of an ethnic than religious identity. This usually goes by the name of "secular Judaism," "cultural Judaism," or "Jewish atheism."
- Dudeism is a non-theistic religion based on Taoism, using the film The Big Lebowski to spread its message of chilling out with a joint and going bowling.
 See also
- Atheist fundamentalism
- Civil religion
- Non-Overlapping Magisteria
- Parody religion
- Secular humanism
- Sociology of religion
- Essay:Atheism is a religion and the debate on its talk page
- Climate change as a religion, and the more general use of “religion” as a term of insult, Andrew Gelman
- Economist Bob Nelson Examines Secular Religions, University of Maryland
- ↑ See "Religion of Atheism" for another example of this counterargument.
- ↑ See "Atheism & Religion" and "Is Atheism a Religion? Defining Atheism and Religion", for a full analysis of why atheism does not fit common definitions of religion.
- ↑ "Court rules atheism a religion", World Net Daily, August 20, 2005.
- ↑ Oh, Please, PZ Myers
- ↑ http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-01/25/alain-de-botton-atheist-temples
- ↑ c.f. http://www.nontheistfriends.org/
- ↑ Reproduced at Creationist.org.
- ↑ Antievolution lawsuit filed in West Virginia National Center for Science Education (May 22nd, 2015)
- ↑ See "Is Evolution a Secular Religion?" by Michael Ruse and Evolution as a Religion by Mary Midgley for further discussion.
- ↑ Topic: Religion, Eugenics Archive
- ↑ See the Wikipedia article on Epic of Evolution.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Michael Crichton, "Environmentalism as Religion".
- ↑ See, for example, Conservapedia's "Environmentalist" article, "Environmentalism as Religion" by John M. Ostrowski, and "Environmentalism is a Religion (Photographic Proof)" (which featured as a main page "news" item at Conservapedia during September 2008).
- ↑ See "Is There a Godless Church of Liberalism or Atheism? Responding to Ann Coulter" and "Is Godless Liberalism a Religion?" for repudiations of Coulter's theory and explorations of why liberalism is not a religion.
- ↑ And then there was market, P. Sanaith
- ↑ The State Religion, Ernest Partridge
- ↑ Invisible Hands: Intelligent Designs and Free Markets, Mark Wexler
- ↑ Religion Facts: The Big Religion Chart (last updated June 24, 2011)
- ↑ nontheistfriends.org: What is a Nontheist? September 20, 2006
- ↑ Dudeism.com