There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
DeMyer's Zeroth Law of Internet Debating states:
DeMyer's First Law of Internet Debating states:
DeMyer's Second Law of Internet Debating states:
“”Anyone who posts an argument on the internet that mainly consists of the quotations of other people can be very safely ignored and is deemed to have lost the argument before it has begun.
DeMyer's Third Law of Internet Debating states:
“”Anyone who posts a picture with a caption that does anything other than describe the picture is deemed to have already lost on the point they were trying to make and it can be ignored.
DeMyer's Fourth Law of Internet Debating states:
DeMyer's Fifth Law of Internet Debating states:
“”Anyone who writes an essay that consists mostly of incoherent babbling and pictures of dogs, bullfights, strange figures, and/or pictures of Adolf Hitler screaming into a microphone is clearly insane, can safely be ignored, and should never be taken seriously.
DeMyer's Sixth Law of Internet Debating states:
“”Anyone who claims victory in a debate after perma-banning their opponent (thus rendering said opponent unable to defend themselves) can be ignored.
DeMyer's Seventh Law of Internet Debating states:
“”Anyone who makes arbitrary, bogus demands before a debate (e.g. asking random pastors to take part, demanding that massive amounts of money be donated to a faith-based charity, etc.) and then sets things up so that said challenger will end up refusing to have the debate no matter what the opponent does is deemed to have lost the debate before it has begun, and can safely be ignored.
In a nutshell
In short, pretty much anyone who uses any of the truly atrocious debating practices that are frequently used by ♥ K e n D o l l ♥ can be safely assumed to have lost the debate.
Amazingly enough, some outside RationalWiki have noticed these, including the
popular UK morning commuter fishwrap Metro.
- PalMD coins DeMyer's law
- Patchy of Freethought & Rationalism with the early form: "Until such time as he can articulate and defend his own argument or question in his own words, he can be very safely ignored."
- Why do atheists constantly bash God but are eerily silent on Satan?
- CP Essay:Conservapedia obsessive compulsive disorder
- Conservapedia:Debating Kendoll