There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| It's gettin' hot in here|
Gore's Law states, as coined by Terence of blog "Long Ago And Not True Anyway" in March 2008:
Immediately after making the post, commenters proceeded to nitpick at Gore — thus proving his point.
Why Gore's Law is relevant
The problem with attacking Al Gore is that he has absolutely fuck all to do with the science of climate change, no matter his carbon footprint,[note 1] PMRC involvement, Manbearpig, etc. You really can't find a better instance of poisoning the well. He could live in a mud hut and walk everywhere and they'd call him a hypocrite because the aglets on his shoelaces were made of plastic, a petroleum product.
Common examples and the reasons they are fallacious include:
- Al Gore is a Democrat.
- Al Gore stands to profit from climate change mitigation. Conflict of interest!
- There are number of errors made in Al Gore's film.
- If Al's claims were at all genuine, he would lower his standard of living. He doesn't practice what he preaches!
- When you see wildly-exaggerated claims like Gore telling people to "turn off all the lights in your house", you know they got their "facts" from conservative talk radio. Go look up the list of tips from An Inconvenient Truth: it's simple stuff like "check your tire pressure" and "buy energy-efficient light bulbs".
In Laanta's words:
"Al Gore could be short, evil and fond of child sacrifice. He could emit more CO2 snoring at night than Christopher Monckton does all year. And his movie could be even more inaccurate than The Great Global Warming Swindle. But this wouldn't change a thing."
Was An Inconvenient Truth Nobel-worthy? It's certainly debatable. While Gore was awarded for popularizing the issue to the general public, others believe he received too much credit because the data involved was never his in the first place.
- He quickly acknowledged the criticism and lived up to it. So, you know, good for him.
- In fact, "Warmists" like Potholer54 have been quite scathing with him on occasions.
- He shares this title with almost all of the most voracious climate deniers.
|Articles on RationalWiki about Eponymous laws|
|Badger's Law - Danth's Law - Feminist internet laws - Godwin's Law - Haggard's Law - Haig's Law - Internet law - List of Poe's Law examples - Loi de Poe - Murphy's Law - Poe's Law - Rove's Law - Whale.to|