RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Anki Gerhardsen

Anki Gerhardsen | Result: Deleted

Anki Gerhardsen (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Article says nothing about what kind of impact this person has had, only that they have said some dumb stuff in the past. Most damningly, subject's Twitter account (which this article's author tends to view as impactful) has only 1,356 followers. I can find no other evidence of public engagement with the subject. In other words, a total nobody and not worth an article. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 19:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
2. In a time when TERFs are becoming more prominent outside of the internet, I feel it would be best to focus our efforts on the ones who organize rallies, influence policy, etc. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 19:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
3. I still have no idea who this person is meant to be after reading the article. Christopher (talk) 19:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
4. Monet ^Ye 20:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
5. I am going to get pushback for voting to keep the other one and delete this, but it's lack of an article on Wikipedia, plus the lack of notability here, forces me to vote keep on that and delete on this. -Gale5050 (talk) 20:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
6. Lacks notability. 𝒮𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑒 ^talk 21:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
7. The Aftenposten search function is shit, but the first ten or so Gerhardsen columns it returns don't suggest she's a prolific transphobe, or even that much of a bigot. Some mild reactionary chuntering about identity politics, free speech, the 'rona, #metoo, etc., but registering in nano-Coulters. Rapidly losing faith in this editor as any kind of reliable narrator. Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
8. Purge with fire. 主要行事月 (talk) 00:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep

1. She does have a pitiful number of followers on Twitter, which would be grounds for deletion if that was the extent of her fame. However, she also has a Norwegian Wikipedia page (Anki Gerhardsen) that has been edited by several people from 2018-2021. Bongolian (talk) 19:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

   A Wikipedia article that doesn’t mention transphobia or trans people in any capacity, despite our article making it seem like that’s her entire focus (less so than it did before I removed some irrelevant stuff about the WHRC which is present in most of Takveis’ articles, but it’s still the case). Christopher (talk) 19:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

   In addition, that's on Norwegian Wikipedia, but what really matters is English Wikipedia. Gale5050 (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

2. Leaning keep, partially because of the disgruntled bon who keeps posting slander and character assassination nonsense on the main article and talk page and seems to have a personal vendetta against the articles creator. Nonstopmaximum (talk) 02:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)