RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Brown dwarf

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Brown dwarf | Result: Keep[edit]

Brown dwarf (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. How is this missional, dont see the purpose. Bubba41102The place where you can scream at me 00:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  2. --Castaigne2 (talk) 05:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  3. --Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 07:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. It appears to debunk some woo-ey claims regarding brown dwarfs.--JorisEnter (talk) 08:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  2. It's got the woo debunk right in there - David Gerard (talk) 08:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  3. Keep, but add links to Planet X and Nibiru to here. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 21:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
  4. Leave it, please. Good to debunk Nibiru-esque claims as stated above. --Panzerfaust (talk) 23:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
  5. An obvious keep in my book. For science! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:49, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
  6. Another piece of evidence for the thesis that a significant part of RW's current userbase doesn't actually give a fuck about skeptical topics, or when it does, it ignores what misinformation is actually out there, focusing instead on name-calling and back-patting. Planet X/Nibiru was big just a few years ago.--ZooGuard (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
    ZG, that's shit and you should know it. Ignorance != apathy. Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 02:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
  7. Sans Coleman. FᴜᴢᴢʏCᴀᴛPᴏᴛᴀᴛᴏ, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 02:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

  • Put the woo'tastic elements into Planet X/Nibiru/Velikovsky/Saturn with the explanatory and debunking bits attached. If it's to be kept, it needs to be expanded with a lot more brown dwarf-related woo to illustrate why it merits a separate article. ScepticWombat (talk) 11:47, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Goat[edit]

  1. It has a "woo" section; doesn't that automatically confer missionality? Men's Rights EXTREMIST (talk) 01:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
    The article has nothing wooey about it on its own, it is in like one paragraph and it is more of a footnote in teh article, it is explained well enough in the articles it mentions in the woo section Bubba41102The place where you can scream at me 01:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)