RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/College Conspiracy

College Conspiracy | Result: Flunked out

College Conspiracy (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. This article is shit even after nearly a decade.This article is about an irrelevant youtube video that was watched by only 50, 000 people Reichtangle (talk) 11:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
2. Christopher (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
3. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 17:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
4. Why do we have an article on this? it has 50,000 views and nobody seems to care about this guy if his the view count of a couple dozen people on his latest videos are to be believed. A somebody. (talk) 22:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
5. I have no belief that this page is either remotely important or capable of being improved. KarmaPolice (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
6. Garbage. Shanghai1 (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
7. No citations, 1 YouTube video from ages ago. Bongolian (talk) 06:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
8. Delete , 0 citations and no importance to anyone. EllyPo (talk) 08:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Keep

1. Well, it's missional in the sense that it exposes a bullshit screed as being, well, bullshit. Old woo is still woo. Luigifan18 (talk) 00:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Goat

• This article was nominated before, with only one vote for delete. I do wonder why this place has become so much more willing to delete articles recently. Christopher (talk) 17:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

  The community and standards of RationalWiki have changed. A somebody. (talk) 22:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

  No wonder there are so many stubs from the Late 2000's and early 2010's ←§ Reichtangle (talk) 02:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

  I suspect some of the folks might have been willing to see if this page/creator would develop into something bigger. It has not [this is a position where the lack of any 'pagehit counter' hinders us, because we have no idea if this page gets much traffic. KarmaPolice (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)