2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/College Conspiracy

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

College Conspiracy | Result: Flunked out[edit]

College Conspiracy (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. This article is shit even after nearly a decade.This article is about an irrelevant youtube video that was watched by only 50, 000 people Reichtangle (talk) 11:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. Christopher (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
  3. cosmikdebris talk stalk 17:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Why do we have an article on this? it has 50,000 views and nobody seems to care about this guy if his the view count of a couple dozen people on his latest videos are to be believed. A somebody. (talk) 22:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
  5. I have no belief that this page is either remotely important or capable of being improved. KarmaPolice (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
  6. Garbage. Shanghai1 (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
  7. No citations, 1 YouTube video from ages ago. Bongolian (talk) 06:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
  8. Delete , 0 citations and no importance to anyone. EllyPo (talk) 08:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. Well, it's missional in the sense that it exposes a bullshit screed as being, well, bullshit. Old woo is still woo. Luigifan18 (talk) 00:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]

  • This article was nominated before, with only one vote for delete. I do wonder why this place has become so much more willing to delete articles recently. Christopher (talk) 17:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
    The community and standards of RationalWiki have changed. A somebody. (talk) 22:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
    No wonder there are so many stubs from the Late 2000's and early 2010's ←§ Reichtangle (talk) 02:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
    I suspect some of the folks might have been willing to see if this page/creator would develop into something bigger. It has not [this is a position where the lack of any 'pagehit counter' hinders us, because we have no idea if this page gets much traffic. KarmaPolice (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)