RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/FactsCan

FactsCan | Result: Deleted

FactsCan (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. This article is a no-effort stub that was created in 2015 and has not been worked on save for minor maintenenance edits since its inception. If you want to work on project space, but not plan on expanding articles, it's best to leave this on your sandbox space rather than create it in mainspace and leave it this way without satisfying our mission. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓^(T|C) 19:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
2. Agreed. Comrade GC (talk) 19:12, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
3. What BabyLuigi said. Christopher (talk) 21:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
4. -DiamondDisc1(talk) 21:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
5. The site hasn't updated in four months either. Vorarchivist (talk) 00:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
6. The article hasn't been updated after it was put on the dumpster dive. Wikipedia even has a stub of the website.—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara  (talk • stalk) 00:18, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Keep

1. The dumpster dive exists, add it to the list. The article does a good amount of debunking, so it has its place on RationalWiki.—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara  (talk • stalk) 19:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

   We would also lose our Google search rank.—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara  (talk • stalk) 19:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

   To me, it doesn't look like it debunks much. I like your efforts in keeping it alive, but the article can use more than just a quote, like exactly what claims it debunks and so on. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓^(T|C) 19:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

2. Good candidate for the dumpster dive. Regards, Cosmikdebris (talk) 19:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)