Information icon.svg At All things in moderation, we are currently voting on restrictions on the use of LLMs (chatbots) in RationalWiki. Reminder: you need to have at least 75 edits and to have been registered for at least three months to be eligible to vote.

RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Megan Fox

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Megan Fox | Result: Deleted because nobody came to its defense after 2 weeks[edit]

Megan Fox (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)


  1. This person seems to be a completely irrelevant. Apparently this is her youtube channel [1], it has only 150k subscribers. All the videos linked on the article are private and a few of the other links are also dead. Also, much from the information I could find about here elsewhere on the Internet came from our very own article. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 02:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
  2. Dead channel, little of interest, also a YouTuber.Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 03:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
  3. ✻ Sigh ✻ Another youtuber who's faded into obscurity. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 16:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
  4. The subject of this article is a complete nobody. As was said back in 2014, this page just exists to say, "Look at this stupid creationist woman. Isn't she stupid?" More than half of the page is about how she wasn't happy about people watching internet porn on computers at her local public library. I wouldn't be happy about that either. She may have complained in the wrong way, but I think she was right to complain. And yes, only two of the links in the references now go to the pages they're meant to, which makes the claims unverifiable. `Spud (talk) 10:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)




  • I will point out that in the Great YouTube Purge of 2018, it was decided that YouTubers had to have at least 1,000 subscribers to have articles here. So Megan Fox meets that criteria 150 times over. Spud (talk) 04:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)