RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Mount Rushmore

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Mount Rushmore | Result: Burned to ash.[edit]

Mount Rushmore (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)


  1. It's been a week since this page was created. It's still a shitty stub that doesn't explain how the monument has any relevance to our mission. Spud (talk) 12:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
  2. This page's a bad joke from the start. Lazer it.--Arisboch (talk) 12:19, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
  3. Missionality not found. The sculptor's political views aren't really relevant, are they? BicyclewheelModerator 16:09, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
  4. ^^^No not really. We don't cover Hitler's painting's for much the same reason. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 16:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
  5. Better to remove the redlink here than to add off-mission content. There's marginally missional stuff somewhere in Mount Rushmore's story, but not worth the effort. MarmotHead (talk) 16:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
  6. Out with this nonsense! Narky SawtoothNarky.png (Nyar?~) 19:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


  1. I will say that this article is about this plank in the Rationalwiki platform:
"Documenting the full range of crank ideas.", and remember, the sculptor was both a Republican and a member of the KKK. Carptrash (talk) 17:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


  • The article contains the words, "perhaps there should not even be an article about it here." so . . ...perhaps not. When ever I run across a red link I think about creating an article. So I did for this one. Carptrash (talk) 18:46, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
    • Maybe you should have thought just a little longer? BicyclewheelModerator 16:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
      • I'm more of a feeling type than a thinking one. Carptrash (talk) 19:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
  • A casual reading of the wikipedia page indicates there may be material for a RW article, but the current article is a bit shit... Carpetsmoker (talk) 15:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)