There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Mount Rushmore
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mount Rushmore | Result: Burned to ash.[edit]
Delete[edit]
- It's been a week since this page was created. It's still a shitty stub that doesn't explain how the monument has any relevance to our mission. Spud (talk) 12:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- This page's a bad joke from the start. Lazer it.--Arisboch (talk) 12:19, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Missionality not found. The sculptor's political views aren't really relevant, are they? Bicyclewheel
16:09, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- ^^^No not really. We don't cover Hitler's painting's for much the same reason. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 16:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Better to remove the redlink here than to add off-mission content. There's marginally missional stuff somewhere in Mount Rushmore's story, but not worth the effort. MarmotHead (talk) 16:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Out with this nonsense! Narky Sawtooth
(Nyar~) 19:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- I will say that this article is about this plank in the Rationalwiki platform:
- "Documenting the full range of crank ideas.", and remember, the sculptor was both a Republican and a member of the KKK. Carptrash (talk) 17:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
- The article contains the words, "perhaps there should not even be an article about it here." so . . ...perhaps not. When ever I run across a red link I think about creating an article. So I did for this one. Carptrash (talk) 18:46, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- A casual reading of the wikipedia page indicates there may be material for a RW article, but the current article is a bit shit... Carpetsmoker (talk) 15:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)