RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Religion of Peace
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Religion of Peace | Result: Keep[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 14:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Kevlarstar As the person who nominated this page for deletion, you cannot just sign your name. Say why it should be deleted. Spud (talk) 14:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Read the article, it's contradicting itself.Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 14:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- You’ve got to explain yourself a bit better than that. You said it was “unsourced” as your reason on the actual page, which is it? Christopher (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- It's both.Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 14:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Like I said, you need to explain yourself a bit better than that. 6 citations for a stub is hardly unsourced, and I don’t see much of a contradiction. Regardless, I don’t think it’s enough to justify deleting the article. Christopher (talk) 15:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- It's both.Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 14:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- You’ve got to explain yourself a bit better than that. You said it was “unsourced” as your reason on the actual page, which is it? Christopher (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Read the article, it's contradicting itself.Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 14:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Kevlarstar As the person who nominated this page for deletion, you cannot just sign your name. Say why it should be deleted. Spud (talk) 14:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- Current article isn’t great, but not to the degree that it warrants deletion for that reason alone. If the article was of good quality, there’d be little doubt it deserved to stay. I have to admit I might be voting differently or not voting at all (probably the latter) if it wasn’t for Kevlarstar’s history of terrible AfDs, a pattern that repeats itself with his refusal to explain his reasoning here. Christopher (talk) 14:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Two wrongs don't make one right Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 14:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Meh. As Christopher says, the article needs some help; but the subject is missional. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 14:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- A stub, but a relevant and missional one. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 14:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- It's not much of an article, but it's missional. Avida Dollarsher again 15:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Missional stubs shouldn't be deleted but expanded if at all possible. Techpriest (I am Alpharius! / / / ) 15:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- What the folks above said. Pretty tired of these lazy AfD's by Kevlarstar, but what else is new. Knight CommanderIn ServiceTo HerGoatness 16:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)