RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Sex-positivity

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sex-positivity | Result: Keep[edit]

Sex-positivity (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) โ€“ (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. Short and does no debunking HedvigsenSkreonk here 10:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  2. See above. Also haven't seen mission justification-Hastur! (talk) 07:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  3. Not really missional. Also, fuck articles with two navbars. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosoliniโ€™s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 16:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. A relevant topic in countering myths about sex, SWERF bullshit, slut-shaming, and religious anti-sex propaganda, which are very missional subjects. A controversial topic where factual presentation is important. Not a perfect article (needs more discussion of porn and sex work), but it has some information and size is long enough to keep. --Annanoon (talk) 10:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  2. Seems fine.๐”–๐”ฒ๐”ช๐”ช๐”ž ๐”„๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ข๐”ฌ๐”ฉ๐”ฌ๐”ค๐”ฆ๐” ๐”ž (๐”ฎ๐”ฒ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ข๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ) (๐”ฐ๐” ๐”ฏ๐”ฆ๐”ญ๐”ฑ๐”ฒ๐”ฏ๐”ž) 19:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  3. Needs more citations, but otherwise OK to keep. Bongolian (talk) 20:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  4. Needs some work, but otherwise relevant enough. Techpriest (I am Alpharius! / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 12:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  5. Judge Dredd (talk) 14:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  6. Tuxer (talk) 10:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  7. Things can always be improved. But I have no problems with this, the fact that is relatively short has no bearing on whether it should be deleted or not. Many articles start as stubs. I would say that "authoritarians" as a group usually have a problem with anything "sex positive" - so what's not to like?Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 10:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  8. Flandres (talk) 17:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]