RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Sistani Nomination & Peace Award-2014

Sistani Nomination & Peace Award-2014 | Result: Vaporized[edit]

I think considering the core aspects of authoritarianism and fundamentalism, it is best for Rational Wiki to give place to every group/unit of mankind irrespective of cast/race and religion or region. Article not only maintains the purpose of the RW rationally but also covers a hot topic. Nannadeem (talk) 21:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Off-Mission, far too long. Zero (talk) 17:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Yeah. I think it belongs on Muslimwiki, not here. Spud (talk) 17:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Gets my vote Placeholder (talk) 20:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Though I have the King of Norway on my speed dial, this site seems an unlikely place to lobby the Nobel peace prize committee. Do we even have an article on Ayatollah Sistani? - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 21:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Zap - David Gerard (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Very poorly written; it's difficult for me to understand what the point even is. This guy got a Nobel nomination and it was controversial, I guess? Why exactly was it controversial? Islamophobia? Or has he just said/done stupid things? Perhaps the author should work on revising it as a user subpage and then, when it's clearer, republish. Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 22:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Off-mission: reads like a lobby press-release, not a rationalwiki article. Could be on mission summarized inside a Ayatollah Sistani article with the proper amount of snark, but cannot stay in mainspace like that. --dx (talk) 10:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Off-mission: what the hell is the point of this article? --NerdyWizard^{you believed that why?} 09:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)