RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Skepticon

Skepticon | Result: Deleted

Skepticon (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. As written, this article would be nicely collapsed into a single paragraph in the skepticism article. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 14:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
2. There is nothing interesting in this article. Just a few sentences of what this is, and the rest is a bunch of lame low-effort list of dates to pad out this thing. --It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 14:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
3. true. — Z 15:00, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
4. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 15:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
5. — Oxyaena ^Harass 16:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
6. Doubtful missionality, seems like an ad. Techpriest ^{(I am Alpharius! / / / )} 21:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
7. Not worthy of being an article.𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 (𝔮𝔲𝔢𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔦𝔰) (𝔰𝔠𝔯𝔦𝔭𝔱𝔲𝔯𝔞) 21:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
8. Not worthy of being an article or being merged into the skepticism article. A boring ad. Nuke the spam. Spud (talk) 01:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Merge/redirect

1. What Spud said. — Oxyaena ^Harass 16:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

   What did Spud say? —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 16:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

   It'd "be fine as it is collapsed into a section in our skeptic article". — Oxyaena ^Harass 22:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

   But, Spud didn't say that. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 00:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

   I'm delighted that "What Spud said" seems to have taken on such positive connotations. But it's true, I didn't say that.Spud (talk) 01:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)